Cargando…
Troubleshooting a Nonresponder: Guidance for the Strength and Conditioning Coach
Ideally an athlete would continue to improve performance indefinitely over time, however improvement slows as the athlete approaches their genetic limits. Measuring performance is complex—performance may be temporarily depressed following aggressive training for multiple reasons, physiological and p...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8227041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34198730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports9060083 |
_version_ | 1783712430985052160 |
---|---|
author | Gleason, Benjamin H. Hornsby, William G. Suarez, Dylan G. Nein, Matthew A. Stone, Michael H. |
author_facet | Gleason, Benjamin H. Hornsby, William G. Suarez, Dylan G. Nein, Matthew A. Stone, Michael H. |
author_sort | Gleason, Benjamin H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ideally an athlete would continue to improve performance indefinitely over time, however improvement slows as the athlete approaches their genetic limits. Measuring performance is complex—performance may be temporarily depressed following aggressive training for multiple reasons, physiological and psychosocial. This reality may be vexing to the strength and conditioning coach, who, as a service provider, must answer to sport coaches about an athlete’s progress. Recently an evaluation mechanism for strength and conditioning coaches was proposed, in part to help coaches establish their effectiveness within the organization. Without formal guidance and realistic expectations, if an athlete is not bigger, leaner, stronger, etc. as a result of training within a specified timeframe, blame is often placed upon the strength and conditioning coach. The purpose of this article is to explore possible causes of what may be perceived as athlete non-responses to training and to provide guidance for the coach on how to handle those issues within their domain. A process of investigation is recommended, along with resources to assist coaches as they consider a broad range of issues, including enhancing existing testing methods, improving athlete behaviors, and adjusting processes designed to bring about performance improvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8227041 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82270412021-06-26 Troubleshooting a Nonresponder: Guidance for the Strength and Conditioning Coach Gleason, Benjamin H. Hornsby, William G. Suarez, Dylan G. Nein, Matthew A. Stone, Michael H. Sports (Basel) Review Ideally an athlete would continue to improve performance indefinitely over time, however improvement slows as the athlete approaches their genetic limits. Measuring performance is complex—performance may be temporarily depressed following aggressive training for multiple reasons, physiological and psychosocial. This reality may be vexing to the strength and conditioning coach, who, as a service provider, must answer to sport coaches about an athlete’s progress. Recently an evaluation mechanism for strength and conditioning coaches was proposed, in part to help coaches establish their effectiveness within the organization. Without formal guidance and realistic expectations, if an athlete is not bigger, leaner, stronger, etc. as a result of training within a specified timeframe, blame is often placed upon the strength and conditioning coach. The purpose of this article is to explore possible causes of what may be perceived as athlete non-responses to training and to provide guidance for the coach on how to handle those issues within their domain. A process of investigation is recommended, along with resources to assist coaches as they consider a broad range of issues, including enhancing existing testing methods, improving athlete behaviors, and adjusting processes designed to bring about performance improvement. MDPI 2021-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8227041/ /pubmed/34198730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports9060083 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Gleason, Benjamin H. Hornsby, William G. Suarez, Dylan G. Nein, Matthew A. Stone, Michael H. Troubleshooting a Nonresponder: Guidance for the Strength and Conditioning Coach |
title | Troubleshooting a Nonresponder: Guidance for the Strength and Conditioning Coach |
title_full | Troubleshooting a Nonresponder: Guidance for the Strength and Conditioning Coach |
title_fullStr | Troubleshooting a Nonresponder: Guidance for the Strength and Conditioning Coach |
title_full_unstemmed | Troubleshooting a Nonresponder: Guidance for the Strength and Conditioning Coach |
title_short | Troubleshooting a Nonresponder: Guidance for the Strength and Conditioning Coach |
title_sort | troubleshooting a nonresponder: guidance for the strength and conditioning coach |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8227041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34198730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports9060083 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gleasonbenjaminh troubleshootinganonresponderguidanceforthestrengthandconditioningcoach AT hornsbywilliamg troubleshootinganonresponderguidanceforthestrengthandconditioningcoach AT suarezdylang troubleshootinganonresponderguidanceforthestrengthandconditioningcoach AT neinmatthewa troubleshootinganonresponderguidanceforthestrengthandconditioningcoach AT stonemichaelh troubleshootinganonresponderguidanceforthestrengthandconditioningcoach |