Cargando…

Troubleshooting a Nonresponder: Guidance for the Strength and Conditioning Coach

Ideally an athlete would continue to improve performance indefinitely over time, however improvement slows as the athlete approaches their genetic limits. Measuring performance is complex—performance may be temporarily depressed following aggressive training for multiple reasons, physiological and p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gleason, Benjamin H., Hornsby, William G., Suarez, Dylan G., Nein, Matthew A., Stone, Michael H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8227041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34198730
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports9060083
_version_ 1783712430985052160
author Gleason, Benjamin H.
Hornsby, William G.
Suarez, Dylan G.
Nein, Matthew A.
Stone, Michael H.
author_facet Gleason, Benjamin H.
Hornsby, William G.
Suarez, Dylan G.
Nein, Matthew A.
Stone, Michael H.
author_sort Gleason, Benjamin H.
collection PubMed
description Ideally an athlete would continue to improve performance indefinitely over time, however improvement slows as the athlete approaches their genetic limits. Measuring performance is complex—performance may be temporarily depressed following aggressive training for multiple reasons, physiological and psychosocial. This reality may be vexing to the strength and conditioning coach, who, as a service provider, must answer to sport coaches about an athlete’s progress. Recently an evaluation mechanism for strength and conditioning coaches was proposed, in part to help coaches establish their effectiveness within the organization. Without formal guidance and realistic expectations, if an athlete is not bigger, leaner, stronger, etc. as a result of training within a specified timeframe, blame is often placed upon the strength and conditioning coach. The purpose of this article is to explore possible causes of what may be perceived as athlete non-responses to training and to provide guidance for the coach on how to handle those issues within their domain. A process of investigation is recommended, along with resources to assist coaches as they consider a broad range of issues, including enhancing existing testing methods, improving athlete behaviors, and adjusting processes designed to bring about performance improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8227041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82270412021-06-26 Troubleshooting a Nonresponder: Guidance for the Strength and Conditioning Coach Gleason, Benjamin H. Hornsby, William G. Suarez, Dylan G. Nein, Matthew A. Stone, Michael H. Sports (Basel) Review Ideally an athlete would continue to improve performance indefinitely over time, however improvement slows as the athlete approaches their genetic limits. Measuring performance is complex—performance may be temporarily depressed following aggressive training for multiple reasons, physiological and psychosocial. This reality may be vexing to the strength and conditioning coach, who, as a service provider, must answer to sport coaches about an athlete’s progress. Recently an evaluation mechanism for strength and conditioning coaches was proposed, in part to help coaches establish their effectiveness within the organization. Without formal guidance and realistic expectations, if an athlete is not bigger, leaner, stronger, etc. as a result of training within a specified timeframe, blame is often placed upon the strength and conditioning coach. The purpose of this article is to explore possible causes of what may be perceived as athlete non-responses to training and to provide guidance for the coach on how to handle those issues within their domain. A process of investigation is recommended, along with resources to assist coaches as they consider a broad range of issues, including enhancing existing testing methods, improving athlete behaviors, and adjusting processes designed to bring about performance improvement. MDPI 2021-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8227041/ /pubmed/34198730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports9060083 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Gleason, Benjamin H.
Hornsby, William G.
Suarez, Dylan G.
Nein, Matthew A.
Stone, Michael H.
Troubleshooting a Nonresponder: Guidance for the Strength and Conditioning Coach
title Troubleshooting a Nonresponder: Guidance for the Strength and Conditioning Coach
title_full Troubleshooting a Nonresponder: Guidance for the Strength and Conditioning Coach
title_fullStr Troubleshooting a Nonresponder: Guidance for the Strength and Conditioning Coach
title_full_unstemmed Troubleshooting a Nonresponder: Guidance for the Strength and Conditioning Coach
title_short Troubleshooting a Nonresponder: Guidance for the Strength and Conditioning Coach
title_sort troubleshooting a nonresponder: guidance for the strength and conditioning coach
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8227041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34198730
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports9060083
work_keys_str_mv AT gleasonbenjaminh troubleshootinganonresponderguidanceforthestrengthandconditioningcoach
AT hornsbywilliamg troubleshootinganonresponderguidanceforthestrengthandconditioningcoach
AT suarezdylang troubleshootinganonresponderguidanceforthestrengthandconditioningcoach
AT neinmatthewa troubleshootinganonresponderguidanceforthestrengthandconditioningcoach
AT stonemichaelh troubleshootinganonresponderguidanceforthestrengthandconditioningcoach