Cargando…
An image-based eyelid lesion management service—evaluation of a pilot
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Oculoplastics is a predominantly visual specialty and many of the pathologies can be diagnosed based on external appearance. An image-based eyelid lesion management service was piloted to reduce the number of patients who would require outpatient clinic review. The aim of this study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8227367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34172942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01632-9 |
_version_ | 1783712507069726720 |
---|---|
author | Hind, J. Edington, M. McFall, K. Salina, E. Diaper, C. Drummond, S. Tejwani, D. Gregory, M. E. Connolly, J. Cauchi, P. Crofts, K. Chadha, V. |
author_facet | Hind, J. Edington, M. McFall, K. Salina, E. Diaper, C. Drummond, S. Tejwani, D. Gregory, M. E. Connolly, J. Cauchi, P. Crofts, K. Chadha, V. |
author_sort | Hind, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Oculoplastics is a predominantly visual specialty and many of the pathologies can be diagnosed based on external appearance. An image-based eyelid lesion management service was piloted to reduce the number of patients who would require outpatient clinic review. The aim of this study was to determine its accuracy and feasibility, both as a hospital-based and community optometrist-based service. If successful, the service was envisaged to significantly reduce the number of patients that require face-to-face (F2F) review, in accordance with current post-COVID-19 principles of social distancing. METHODS: Patients with lid lesions attending an oculoplastics clinic were assessed by consultant oculoplastic surgeons in an F2F consultation (Arm A). The lesions were photographed by a professional clinical photographer (Arm B) and by an optometrist with a handheld digital camera (Arm C). These images were reviewed by independent consultants masked to the outcome of the F2F clinical encounter. Data were collected prospectively including patient demographics, diagnosis, suspicion of malignancy and management. The image-based clinic results were compared to the F2F clinic results. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were included. Clinical diagnoses were compared for intra-observer variability and substantial agreement was demonstrated between gold-standard F2F clinic visit (Arm A) and Arm B (Ƙ = 0.708) and C (Ƙ = 0.776). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of discharge and all cases of malignancy were either identified or flagged for F2F review in the image-based arms. CONCLUSION: This pilot demonstrated substantial diagnostic agreement of image-based diagnoses with F2F consultation and image review alone did not miss any cases of malignancy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8227367 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82273672021-06-25 An image-based eyelid lesion management service—evaluation of a pilot Hind, J. Edington, M. McFall, K. Salina, E. Diaper, C. Drummond, S. Tejwani, D. Gregory, M. E. Connolly, J. Cauchi, P. Crofts, K. Chadha, V. Eye (Lond) Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Oculoplastics is a predominantly visual specialty and many of the pathologies can be diagnosed based on external appearance. An image-based eyelid lesion management service was piloted to reduce the number of patients who would require outpatient clinic review. The aim of this study was to determine its accuracy and feasibility, both as a hospital-based and community optometrist-based service. If successful, the service was envisaged to significantly reduce the number of patients that require face-to-face (F2F) review, in accordance with current post-COVID-19 principles of social distancing. METHODS: Patients with lid lesions attending an oculoplastics clinic were assessed by consultant oculoplastic surgeons in an F2F consultation (Arm A). The lesions were photographed by a professional clinical photographer (Arm B) and by an optometrist with a handheld digital camera (Arm C). These images were reviewed by independent consultants masked to the outcome of the F2F clinical encounter. Data were collected prospectively including patient demographics, diagnosis, suspicion of malignancy and management. The image-based clinic results were compared to the F2F clinic results. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were included. Clinical diagnoses were compared for intra-observer variability and substantial agreement was demonstrated between gold-standard F2F clinic visit (Arm A) and Arm B (Ƙ = 0.708) and C (Ƙ = 0.776). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of discharge and all cases of malignancy were either identified or flagged for F2F review in the image-based arms. CONCLUSION: This pilot demonstrated substantial diagnostic agreement of image-based diagnoses with F2F consultation and image review alone did not miss any cases of malignancy. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-25 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8227367/ /pubmed/34172942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01632-9 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2021 |
spellingShingle | Article Hind, J. Edington, M. McFall, K. Salina, E. Diaper, C. Drummond, S. Tejwani, D. Gregory, M. E. Connolly, J. Cauchi, P. Crofts, K. Chadha, V. An image-based eyelid lesion management service—evaluation of a pilot |
title | An image-based eyelid lesion management service—evaluation of a pilot |
title_full | An image-based eyelid lesion management service—evaluation of a pilot |
title_fullStr | An image-based eyelid lesion management service—evaluation of a pilot |
title_full_unstemmed | An image-based eyelid lesion management service—evaluation of a pilot |
title_short | An image-based eyelid lesion management service—evaluation of a pilot |
title_sort | image-based eyelid lesion management service—evaluation of a pilot |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8227367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34172942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01632-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hindj animagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot AT edingtonm animagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot AT mcfallk animagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot AT salinae animagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot AT diaperc animagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot AT drummonds animagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot AT tejwanid animagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot AT gregoryme animagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot AT connollyj animagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot AT cauchip animagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot AT croftsk animagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot AT chadhav animagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot AT hindj imagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot AT edingtonm imagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot AT mcfallk imagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot AT salinae imagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot AT diaperc imagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot AT drummonds imagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot AT tejwanid imagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot AT gregoryme imagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot AT connollyj imagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot AT cauchip imagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot AT croftsk imagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot AT chadhav imagebasedeyelidlesionmanagementserviceevaluationofapilot |