Cargando…
Evaluation of a Novel CLIA Monotest Assay for the Detection of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus-IgG and IgM: A Retrospective Comparison with a Line Blot and an ELISA
Despite the increasing relevance of Hepatitis E, an emerging disease endemic in developing and with increasing numbers of sporadic cases in industrialized countries, commercial tests are mainly based on batch oriented serological assays. In this retrospective study, we compared a line immunoassay (L...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8228023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34206114 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060689 |
_version_ | 1783712645256314880 |
---|---|
author | Dichtl, Karl Zimmermann, Julia Koeppel, Martin B. Böhm, Stephan Osterman, Andreas |
author_facet | Dichtl, Karl Zimmermann, Julia Koeppel, Martin B. Böhm, Stephan Osterman, Andreas |
author_sort | Dichtl, Karl |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite the increasing relevance of Hepatitis E, an emerging disease endemic in developing and with increasing numbers of sporadic cases in industrialized countries, commercial tests are mainly based on batch oriented serological assays. In this retrospective study, we compared a line immunoassay (LIA; recomLine HEV, Mikrogen) and an ELISA (EIA; Anti-Hepatitis E Virus ELISA, Euroimmun) with a novel chemoluminescence immunoassay in a monotest format (CLIA; Hepatitis E VirClia, Vircell). Twenty sera of PCR proven cases of hepatitis E and 68 blood samples serologically pre-characterized were included. Applying the WHO reference standard, the CLIA demonstrated the highest analytical sensitivity for IgG and IgM. The combinations of CLIA/EIA (IgG and IgM) and CLIA/LIA (IgG) measurements showed substantial correlation. Compared to overall antibody detection (seropositivity in ≥2 assays), CLIA correlation was excellent, outperforming LIA (IgM) and EIA (IgG and IgM). Minor IgM cross reactivity in samples of patients with acute EBV infection was observed in all three assays. The CLIA showed good performance in diagnostic samples compared to established LIA and EIA assays. Due to its ready-to-use monotest format, the CLIA allows simple, time- and cost-effective handling of single samples. These qualities make the assay suitable for diagnostics, especially in the emergency setting and for low-throughput laboratories. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8228023 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82280232021-06-26 Evaluation of a Novel CLIA Monotest Assay for the Detection of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus-IgG and IgM: A Retrospective Comparison with a Line Blot and an ELISA Dichtl, Karl Zimmermann, Julia Koeppel, Martin B. Böhm, Stephan Osterman, Andreas Pathogens Article Despite the increasing relevance of Hepatitis E, an emerging disease endemic in developing and with increasing numbers of sporadic cases in industrialized countries, commercial tests are mainly based on batch oriented serological assays. In this retrospective study, we compared a line immunoassay (LIA; recomLine HEV, Mikrogen) and an ELISA (EIA; Anti-Hepatitis E Virus ELISA, Euroimmun) with a novel chemoluminescence immunoassay in a monotest format (CLIA; Hepatitis E VirClia, Vircell). Twenty sera of PCR proven cases of hepatitis E and 68 blood samples serologically pre-characterized were included. Applying the WHO reference standard, the CLIA demonstrated the highest analytical sensitivity for IgG and IgM. The combinations of CLIA/EIA (IgG and IgM) and CLIA/LIA (IgG) measurements showed substantial correlation. Compared to overall antibody detection (seropositivity in ≥2 assays), CLIA correlation was excellent, outperforming LIA (IgM) and EIA (IgG and IgM). Minor IgM cross reactivity in samples of patients with acute EBV infection was observed in all three assays. The CLIA showed good performance in diagnostic samples compared to established LIA and EIA assays. Due to its ready-to-use monotest format, the CLIA allows simple, time- and cost-effective handling of single samples. These qualities make the assay suitable for diagnostics, especially in the emergency setting and for low-throughput laboratories. MDPI 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8228023/ /pubmed/34206114 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060689 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Dichtl, Karl Zimmermann, Julia Koeppel, Martin B. Böhm, Stephan Osterman, Andreas Evaluation of a Novel CLIA Monotest Assay for the Detection of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus-IgG and IgM: A Retrospective Comparison with a Line Blot and an ELISA |
title | Evaluation of a Novel CLIA Monotest Assay for the Detection of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus-IgG and IgM: A Retrospective Comparison with a Line Blot and an ELISA |
title_full | Evaluation of a Novel CLIA Monotest Assay for the Detection of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus-IgG and IgM: A Retrospective Comparison with a Line Blot and an ELISA |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a Novel CLIA Monotest Assay for the Detection of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus-IgG and IgM: A Retrospective Comparison with a Line Blot and an ELISA |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a Novel CLIA Monotest Assay for the Detection of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus-IgG and IgM: A Retrospective Comparison with a Line Blot and an ELISA |
title_short | Evaluation of a Novel CLIA Monotest Assay for the Detection of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus-IgG and IgM: A Retrospective Comparison with a Line Blot and an ELISA |
title_sort | evaluation of a novel clia monotest assay for the detection of anti-hepatitis e virus-igg and igm: a retrospective comparison with a line blot and an elisa |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8228023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34206114 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060689 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dichtlkarl evaluationofanovelcliamonotestassayforthedetectionofantihepatitisevirusiggandigmaretrospectivecomparisonwithalineblotandanelisa AT zimmermannjulia evaluationofanovelcliamonotestassayforthedetectionofantihepatitisevirusiggandigmaretrospectivecomparisonwithalineblotandanelisa AT koeppelmartinb evaluationofanovelcliamonotestassayforthedetectionofantihepatitisevirusiggandigmaretrospectivecomparisonwithalineblotandanelisa AT bohmstephan evaluationofanovelcliamonotestassayforthedetectionofantihepatitisevirusiggandigmaretrospectivecomparisonwithalineblotandanelisa AT ostermanandreas evaluationofanovelcliamonotestassayforthedetectionofantihepatitisevirusiggandigmaretrospectivecomparisonwithalineblotandanelisa |