Cargando…

Evaluation of a Novel CLIA Monotest Assay for the Detection of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus-IgG and IgM: A Retrospective Comparison with a Line Blot and an ELISA

Despite the increasing relevance of Hepatitis E, an emerging disease endemic in developing and with increasing numbers of sporadic cases in industrialized countries, commercial tests are mainly based on batch oriented serological assays. In this retrospective study, we compared a line immunoassay (L...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dichtl, Karl, Zimmermann, Julia, Koeppel, Martin B., Böhm, Stephan, Osterman, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8228023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34206114
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060689
_version_ 1783712645256314880
author Dichtl, Karl
Zimmermann, Julia
Koeppel, Martin B.
Böhm, Stephan
Osterman, Andreas
author_facet Dichtl, Karl
Zimmermann, Julia
Koeppel, Martin B.
Böhm, Stephan
Osterman, Andreas
author_sort Dichtl, Karl
collection PubMed
description Despite the increasing relevance of Hepatitis E, an emerging disease endemic in developing and with increasing numbers of sporadic cases in industrialized countries, commercial tests are mainly based on batch oriented serological assays. In this retrospective study, we compared a line immunoassay (LIA; recomLine HEV, Mikrogen) and an ELISA (EIA; Anti-Hepatitis E Virus ELISA, Euroimmun) with a novel chemoluminescence immunoassay in a monotest format (CLIA; Hepatitis E VirClia, Vircell). Twenty sera of PCR proven cases of hepatitis E and 68 blood samples serologically pre-characterized were included. Applying the WHO reference standard, the CLIA demonstrated the highest analytical sensitivity for IgG and IgM. The combinations of CLIA/EIA (IgG and IgM) and CLIA/LIA (IgG) measurements showed substantial correlation. Compared to overall antibody detection (seropositivity in ≥2 assays), CLIA correlation was excellent, outperforming LIA (IgM) and EIA (IgG and IgM). Minor IgM cross reactivity in samples of patients with acute EBV infection was observed in all three assays. The CLIA showed good performance in diagnostic samples compared to established LIA and EIA assays. Due to its ready-to-use monotest format, the CLIA allows simple, time- and cost-effective handling of single samples. These qualities make the assay suitable for diagnostics, especially in the emergency setting and for low-throughput laboratories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8228023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82280232021-06-26 Evaluation of a Novel CLIA Monotest Assay for the Detection of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus-IgG and IgM: A Retrospective Comparison with a Line Blot and an ELISA Dichtl, Karl Zimmermann, Julia Koeppel, Martin B. Böhm, Stephan Osterman, Andreas Pathogens Article Despite the increasing relevance of Hepatitis E, an emerging disease endemic in developing and with increasing numbers of sporadic cases in industrialized countries, commercial tests are mainly based on batch oriented serological assays. In this retrospective study, we compared a line immunoassay (LIA; recomLine HEV, Mikrogen) and an ELISA (EIA; Anti-Hepatitis E Virus ELISA, Euroimmun) with a novel chemoluminescence immunoassay in a monotest format (CLIA; Hepatitis E VirClia, Vircell). Twenty sera of PCR proven cases of hepatitis E and 68 blood samples serologically pre-characterized were included. Applying the WHO reference standard, the CLIA demonstrated the highest analytical sensitivity for IgG and IgM. The combinations of CLIA/EIA (IgG and IgM) and CLIA/LIA (IgG) measurements showed substantial correlation. Compared to overall antibody detection (seropositivity in ≥2 assays), CLIA correlation was excellent, outperforming LIA (IgM) and EIA (IgG and IgM). Minor IgM cross reactivity in samples of patients with acute EBV infection was observed in all three assays. The CLIA showed good performance in diagnostic samples compared to established LIA and EIA assays. Due to its ready-to-use monotest format, the CLIA allows simple, time- and cost-effective handling of single samples. These qualities make the assay suitable for diagnostics, especially in the emergency setting and for low-throughput laboratories. MDPI 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8228023/ /pubmed/34206114 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060689 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dichtl, Karl
Zimmermann, Julia
Koeppel, Martin B.
Böhm, Stephan
Osterman, Andreas
Evaluation of a Novel CLIA Monotest Assay for the Detection of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus-IgG and IgM: A Retrospective Comparison with a Line Blot and an ELISA
title Evaluation of a Novel CLIA Monotest Assay for the Detection of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus-IgG and IgM: A Retrospective Comparison with a Line Blot and an ELISA
title_full Evaluation of a Novel CLIA Monotest Assay for the Detection of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus-IgG and IgM: A Retrospective Comparison with a Line Blot and an ELISA
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Novel CLIA Monotest Assay for the Detection of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus-IgG and IgM: A Retrospective Comparison with a Line Blot and an ELISA
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Novel CLIA Monotest Assay for the Detection of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus-IgG and IgM: A Retrospective Comparison with a Line Blot and an ELISA
title_short Evaluation of a Novel CLIA Monotest Assay for the Detection of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus-IgG and IgM: A Retrospective Comparison with a Line Blot and an ELISA
title_sort evaluation of a novel clia monotest assay for the detection of anti-hepatitis e virus-igg and igm: a retrospective comparison with a line blot and an elisa
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8228023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34206114
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060689
work_keys_str_mv AT dichtlkarl evaluationofanovelcliamonotestassayforthedetectionofantihepatitisevirusiggandigmaretrospectivecomparisonwithalineblotandanelisa
AT zimmermannjulia evaluationofanovelcliamonotestassayforthedetectionofantihepatitisevirusiggandigmaretrospectivecomparisonwithalineblotandanelisa
AT koeppelmartinb evaluationofanovelcliamonotestassayforthedetectionofantihepatitisevirusiggandigmaretrospectivecomparisonwithalineblotandanelisa
AT bohmstephan evaluationofanovelcliamonotestassayforthedetectionofantihepatitisevirusiggandigmaretrospectivecomparisonwithalineblotandanelisa
AT ostermanandreas evaluationofanovelcliamonotestassayforthedetectionofantihepatitisevirusiggandigmaretrospectivecomparisonwithalineblotandanelisa