Cargando…

Can Adding BMP2 Improve Outcomes in Patients Undergoing the SUPERhip Procedure?

Congenital femoral deficiency (CFD) Paley type 1b is characterized by severe bony deformity of the upper femur, extra-articular contractures of the hip, and(,) delayed ossification of the femoral neck and/or subtrochanteric region. The Systematic Utilitarian Procedure for Extremity Reconstruction of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paley, Dror, Shannon, Claire E., Nogueira, Monica, Chiari, Catharina, Harris, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8228032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34200672
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8060495
_version_ 1783712647394361344
author Paley, Dror
Shannon, Claire E.
Nogueira, Monica
Chiari, Catharina
Harris, Matthew
author_facet Paley, Dror
Shannon, Claire E.
Nogueira, Monica
Chiari, Catharina
Harris, Matthew
author_sort Paley, Dror
collection PubMed
description Congenital femoral deficiency (CFD) Paley type 1b is characterized by severe bony deformity of the upper femur, extra-articular contractures of the hip, and(,) delayed ossification of the femoral neck and/or subtrochanteric region. The Systematic Utilitarian Procedure for Extremity Reconstruction of the hip (SUPERhip) procedure for the correction of CFD deformities was developed in 1997. Initially, a non-fixed angle device (rush rod) was used for fixation. Late complications of persistent delayed ossification and recurrent varus deformity occurred. In order to reduce and treat such complications, fixation with a fixed angle device and the off-label use of BMP2 to induce ossification of the un-ossified femoral neck were employed. The purpose of this study is to determine if the use of a fixed angle device, and, BMP2 inserted into a drill hole in the cartilage of the femoral neck, decreases the incidence of these late complications. We retrospectively reviewed 72 SUPERhip procedures performed for Paley type 1b CFD between 1997 and 2012. Due to recurrent varus or persistent delayed ossification of the femoral neck, 34 revision SUPERhip procedures were performed. In total, 106 SUPERhip procedures were studied. Sixty-eight SUPERhips were performed using internal fixation without BMP2, while 38 SUPERhips were performed with both internal fixation and the addition of BMP2. Forty-one were performed using non-fixed angle internal fixation while 65 had fixed angle internal fixation. Fixed angle devices significantly reduced the incidence of recurrent varus compared with non-fixed angle devices. Inserting BMP2 in the femoral neck significantly reduced the incidence of persistent delayed ossification. Using only a fixed angle device but no BMP2 did not reduce the incidence of delayed ossification. The combination of both a fixed angle device and BMP2 reduced the incidence of recurrent coxa vara and persistent delayed ossification of the femoral neck. The SUPERhip procedure corrects the pathoanatomy of the proximal femur in CFD Paley type 1b but is associated with a very high risk of recurrence of coxa vara and persistence of femoral neck delayed ossification, unless, a fixed angle internal fixation device is used to prevent recurrent coxa vara and BMP2 is used to induce ossification of the femoral neck.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8228032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82280322021-06-26 Can Adding BMP2 Improve Outcomes in Patients Undergoing the SUPERhip Procedure? Paley, Dror Shannon, Claire E. Nogueira, Monica Chiari, Catharina Harris, Matthew Children (Basel) Article Congenital femoral deficiency (CFD) Paley type 1b is characterized by severe bony deformity of the upper femur, extra-articular contractures of the hip, and(,) delayed ossification of the femoral neck and/or subtrochanteric region. The Systematic Utilitarian Procedure for Extremity Reconstruction of the hip (SUPERhip) procedure for the correction of CFD deformities was developed in 1997. Initially, a non-fixed angle device (rush rod) was used for fixation. Late complications of persistent delayed ossification and recurrent varus deformity occurred. In order to reduce and treat such complications, fixation with a fixed angle device and the off-label use of BMP2 to induce ossification of the un-ossified femoral neck were employed. The purpose of this study is to determine if the use of a fixed angle device, and, BMP2 inserted into a drill hole in the cartilage of the femoral neck, decreases the incidence of these late complications. We retrospectively reviewed 72 SUPERhip procedures performed for Paley type 1b CFD between 1997 and 2012. Due to recurrent varus or persistent delayed ossification of the femoral neck, 34 revision SUPERhip procedures were performed. In total, 106 SUPERhip procedures were studied. Sixty-eight SUPERhips were performed using internal fixation without BMP2, while 38 SUPERhips were performed with both internal fixation and the addition of BMP2. Forty-one were performed using non-fixed angle internal fixation while 65 had fixed angle internal fixation. Fixed angle devices significantly reduced the incidence of recurrent varus compared with non-fixed angle devices. Inserting BMP2 in the femoral neck significantly reduced the incidence of persistent delayed ossification. Using only a fixed angle device but no BMP2 did not reduce the incidence of delayed ossification. The combination of both a fixed angle device and BMP2 reduced the incidence of recurrent coxa vara and persistent delayed ossification of the femoral neck. The SUPERhip procedure corrects the pathoanatomy of the proximal femur in CFD Paley type 1b but is associated with a very high risk of recurrence of coxa vara and persistence of femoral neck delayed ossification, unless, a fixed angle internal fixation device is used to prevent recurrent coxa vara and BMP2 is used to induce ossification of the femoral neck. MDPI 2021-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8228032/ /pubmed/34200672 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8060495 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Paley, Dror
Shannon, Claire E.
Nogueira, Monica
Chiari, Catharina
Harris, Matthew
Can Adding BMP2 Improve Outcomes in Patients Undergoing the SUPERhip Procedure?
title Can Adding BMP2 Improve Outcomes in Patients Undergoing the SUPERhip Procedure?
title_full Can Adding BMP2 Improve Outcomes in Patients Undergoing the SUPERhip Procedure?
title_fullStr Can Adding BMP2 Improve Outcomes in Patients Undergoing the SUPERhip Procedure?
title_full_unstemmed Can Adding BMP2 Improve Outcomes in Patients Undergoing the SUPERhip Procedure?
title_short Can Adding BMP2 Improve Outcomes in Patients Undergoing the SUPERhip Procedure?
title_sort can adding bmp2 improve outcomes in patients undergoing the superhip procedure?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8228032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34200672
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8060495
work_keys_str_mv AT paleydror canaddingbmp2improveoutcomesinpatientsundergoingthesuperhipprocedure
AT shannonclairee canaddingbmp2improveoutcomesinpatientsundergoingthesuperhipprocedure
AT nogueiramonica canaddingbmp2improveoutcomesinpatientsundergoingthesuperhipprocedure
AT chiaricatharina canaddingbmp2improveoutcomesinpatientsundergoingthesuperhipprocedure
AT harrismatthew canaddingbmp2improveoutcomesinpatientsundergoingthesuperhipprocedure