Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines in Phase III Trials: A Meta-Analysis

Nowadays, the vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines is being promoted worldwide, professionals and common people are very concerned about the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines. No published systematic review and meta-analysis has assessed the efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 vaccines based on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Haoyue, Peng, Zhicheng, Luo, Wenliang, Si, Shuting, Mo, Minjia, Zhou, Haibo, Xin, Xing, Liu, Hui, Yu, Yunxian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8228087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34206032
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060582
_version_ 1783712660434452480
author Cheng, Haoyue
Peng, Zhicheng
Luo, Wenliang
Si, Shuting
Mo, Minjia
Zhou, Haibo
Xin, Xing
Liu, Hui
Yu, Yunxian
author_facet Cheng, Haoyue
Peng, Zhicheng
Luo, Wenliang
Si, Shuting
Mo, Minjia
Zhou, Haibo
Xin, Xing
Liu, Hui
Yu, Yunxian
author_sort Cheng, Haoyue
collection PubMed
description Nowadays, the vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines is being promoted worldwide, professionals and common people are very concerned about the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines. No published systematic review and meta-analysis has assessed the efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 vaccines based on data from phase III clinical trials. Therefore, this study has estimated the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines and the differences between vaccine types. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, medRxiv databases and two websites were used to retrieve the studies. Random-effects models were used to estimate the pooled efficacy and safety with risk ratio (RR). A total of eight studies, seven COVID-19 vaccines and 158,204 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. All the vaccines had a good preventive effect on COVID-19 (RR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.09–0.32), and the mRNA vaccine (RR = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.03–0.09) was the most effective against COVID-19, while the inactivated vaccine (RR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.19–0.54) was the least. In terms of safety, the risk of overall adverse events showed an increase in the vaccine group after the first (RR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.03–2.05) or second (RR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.04–2.20) injection. However, compared with the first injection, the risk of local (RR = 2.64, 95% CI: 1.02–6.83 vs. RR = 2.25, 95% CI: 0.52–9.75) and systemic (RR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.21–1.46 vs. RR = 1.59, 95% CI: 0.84–3.01) adverse events decreased after the second injection. As for the mRNA vaccine, the risk of overall adverse events increased significantly, compared with the placebo, no matter whether it was the first (RR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.80–1.86) or the second (RR = 2.16, 95% CI = 2.11–2.20) injection. All the COVID-19 vaccines that have published the data of phase III clinical trials have excellent efficacy, and the risk of adverse events is acceptable. The mRNA vaccines were the most effective against COVID-19, meanwhile the risk and grade of adverse events was minimal, compared to that of severe symptoms induced by COVID-19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8228087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82280872021-06-26 Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines in Phase III Trials: A Meta-Analysis Cheng, Haoyue Peng, Zhicheng Luo, Wenliang Si, Shuting Mo, Minjia Zhou, Haibo Xin, Xing Liu, Hui Yu, Yunxian Vaccines (Basel) Article Nowadays, the vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines is being promoted worldwide, professionals and common people are very concerned about the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines. No published systematic review and meta-analysis has assessed the efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 vaccines based on data from phase III clinical trials. Therefore, this study has estimated the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines and the differences between vaccine types. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, medRxiv databases and two websites were used to retrieve the studies. Random-effects models were used to estimate the pooled efficacy and safety with risk ratio (RR). A total of eight studies, seven COVID-19 vaccines and 158,204 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. All the vaccines had a good preventive effect on COVID-19 (RR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.09–0.32), and the mRNA vaccine (RR = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.03–0.09) was the most effective against COVID-19, while the inactivated vaccine (RR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.19–0.54) was the least. In terms of safety, the risk of overall adverse events showed an increase in the vaccine group after the first (RR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.03–2.05) or second (RR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.04–2.20) injection. However, compared with the first injection, the risk of local (RR = 2.64, 95% CI: 1.02–6.83 vs. RR = 2.25, 95% CI: 0.52–9.75) and systemic (RR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.21–1.46 vs. RR = 1.59, 95% CI: 0.84–3.01) adverse events decreased after the second injection. As for the mRNA vaccine, the risk of overall adverse events increased significantly, compared with the placebo, no matter whether it was the first (RR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.80–1.86) or the second (RR = 2.16, 95% CI = 2.11–2.20) injection. All the COVID-19 vaccines that have published the data of phase III clinical trials have excellent efficacy, and the risk of adverse events is acceptable. The mRNA vaccines were the most effective against COVID-19, meanwhile the risk and grade of adverse events was minimal, compared to that of severe symptoms induced by COVID-19. MDPI 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8228087/ /pubmed/34206032 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060582 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cheng, Haoyue
Peng, Zhicheng
Luo, Wenliang
Si, Shuting
Mo, Minjia
Zhou, Haibo
Xin, Xing
Liu, Hui
Yu, Yunxian
Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines in Phase III Trials: A Meta-Analysis
title Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines in Phase III Trials: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines in Phase III Trials: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines in Phase III Trials: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines in Phase III Trials: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines in Phase III Trials: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of covid-19 vaccines in phase iii trials: a meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8228087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34206032
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060582
work_keys_str_mv AT chenghaoyue efficacyandsafetyofcovid19vaccinesinphaseiiitrialsametaanalysis
AT pengzhicheng efficacyandsafetyofcovid19vaccinesinphaseiiitrialsametaanalysis
AT luowenliang efficacyandsafetyofcovid19vaccinesinphaseiiitrialsametaanalysis
AT sishuting efficacyandsafetyofcovid19vaccinesinphaseiiitrialsametaanalysis
AT mominjia efficacyandsafetyofcovid19vaccinesinphaseiiitrialsametaanalysis
AT zhouhaibo efficacyandsafetyofcovid19vaccinesinphaseiiitrialsametaanalysis
AT xinxing efficacyandsafetyofcovid19vaccinesinphaseiiitrialsametaanalysis
AT liuhui efficacyandsafetyofcovid19vaccinesinphaseiiitrialsametaanalysis
AT yuyunxian efficacyandsafetyofcovid19vaccinesinphaseiiitrialsametaanalysis