Cargando…

Smartphone-Based Pelvic Movement Asymmetry Measures for Clinical Decision Making in Equine Lameness Assessment

SIMPLE SUMMARY: As visual evaluation of hindlimb lameness in the horse is challenging, objective measurements could aid clinical decision making. Our study investigated the association of pelvic movement asymmetry, recorded via a smartphone, with lameness scores of one experienced veterinarian. In g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marunova, Eva, Dod, Leea, Witte, Stefan, Pfau, Thilo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8228485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34204921
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11061665
_version_ 1783712754056560640
author Marunova, Eva
Dod, Leea
Witte, Stefan
Pfau, Thilo
author_facet Marunova, Eva
Dod, Leea
Witte, Stefan
Pfau, Thilo
author_sort Marunova, Eva
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: As visual evaluation of hindlimb lameness in the horse is challenging, objective measurements could aid clinical decision making. Our study investigated the association of pelvic movement asymmetry, recorded via a smartphone, with lameness scores of one experienced veterinarian. In general, cut-off points between lameness grades increased with increasing severity of lameness. Pelvic upward movement amplitude difference was the asymmetry parameter with the highest discriminative power based on subjective lameness scoring of a specialist veterinarian. This parameter classified a higher proportion of lame and non-lame horses correctly compared to the parameters assessing differences between pelvic vertical movement minima and maxima. Although the use of a smartphone measuring only the symmetry of pelvis cannot replace a full lameness examination, it presents a useful adjunct to subjective evaluation alone. Quantification of pelvic asymmetry with a smartphone may also be a useful tool in the context of tracking progress after a treatment or during the rehabilitation process. ABSTRACT: Visual evaluation of hindlimb lameness in the horse is challenging. Objective measurements, simultaneous to visual assessment, are used increasingly to aid clinical decision making. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of pelvic movement asymmetry with lameness scores (UK scale 0–10) of one experienced veterinarian. Absolute values of pelvic asymmetry measures, quantifying differences between vertical minima (AbPDMin), maxima (AbPDMax) and upward movement amplitudes (AbPDUp), were recorded during straight-line trot with a smartphone attached to the sacrum (n = 301 horses). Overall, there was a significant difference between lameness grades for all three asymmetry measures (p < 0.001). Five pair-wise differences (out of 10) were significant for AbPDMin (p [Formula: see text] 0.02) and seven for AbPDMax (p [Formula: see text] 0.03) and AbPDUp (p [Formula: see text] 0.02). Receiver operating curves assessed sensitivity and specificity of asymmetry measures against lameness scores. AbPDUp had the highest discriminative power (area under curve (AUC) = 0.801–0.852) followed by AbPDMax (AUC = 0.728–0.813) and AbPDMin (AUC = 0.688–0.785). Cut-off points between non-lame (grade 0) and lame horses (grades 1–4) with a minimum sensitivity of 75% were identified as AbPDUp [Formula: see text] 7.5 mm (67.6% specificity), AbPDMax [Formula: see text] 4.5 mm (51.9% specificity) and AbPDMin [Formula: see text] 2.5 mm (33.3% specificity). In conclusion, pelvic upward movement amplitude difference (AbPDUp) was the asymmetry parameter with the highest discriminative power in this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8228485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82284852021-06-26 Smartphone-Based Pelvic Movement Asymmetry Measures for Clinical Decision Making in Equine Lameness Assessment Marunova, Eva Dod, Leea Witte, Stefan Pfau, Thilo Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: As visual evaluation of hindlimb lameness in the horse is challenging, objective measurements could aid clinical decision making. Our study investigated the association of pelvic movement asymmetry, recorded via a smartphone, with lameness scores of one experienced veterinarian. In general, cut-off points between lameness grades increased with increasing severity of lameness. Pelvic upward movement amplitude difference was the asymmetry parameter with the highest discriminative power based on subjective lameness scoring of a specialist veterinarian. This parameter classified a higher proportion of lame and non-lame horses correctly compared to the parameters assessing differences between pelvic vertical movement minima and maxima. Although the use of a smartphone measuring only the symmetry of pelvis cannot replace a full lameness examination, it presents a useful adjunct to subjective evaluation alone. Quantification of pelvic asymmetry with a smartphone may also be a useful tool in the context of tracking progress after a treatment or during the rehabilitation process. ABSTRACT: Visual evaluation of hindlimb lameness in the horse is challenging. Objective measurements, simultaneous to visual assessment, are used increasingly to aid clinical decision making. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of pelvic movement asymmetry with lameness scores (UK scale 0–10) of one experienced veterinarian. Absolute values of pelvic asymmetry measures, quantifying differences between vertical minima (AbPDMin), maxima (AbPDMax) and upward movement amplitudes (AbPDUp), were recorded during straight-line trot with a smartphone attached to the sacrum (n = 301 horses). Overall, there was a significant difference between lameness grades for all three asymmetry measures (p < 0.001). Five pair-wise differences (out of 10) were significant for AbPDMin (p [Formula: see text] 0.02) and seven for AbPDMax (p [Formula: see text] 0.03) and AbPDUp (p [Formula: see text] 0.02). Receiver operating curves assessed sensitivity and specificity of asymmetry measures against lameness scores. AbPDUp had the highest discriminative power (area under curve (AUC) = 0.801–0.852) followed by AbPDMax (AUC = 0.728–0.813) and AbPDMin (AUC = 0.688–0.785). Cut-off points between non-lame (grade 0) and lame horses (grades 1–4) with a minimum sensitivity of 75% were identified as AbPDUp [Formula: see text] 7.5 mm (67.6% specificity), AbPDMax [Formula: see text] 4.5 mm (51.9% specificity) and AbPDMin [Formula: see text] 2.5 mm (33.3% specificity). In conclusion, pelvic upward movement amplitude difference (AbPDUp) was the asymmetry parameter with the highest discriminative power in this study. MDPI 2021-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8228485/ /pubmed/34204921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11061665 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Marunova, Eva
Dod, Leea
Witte, Stefan
Pfau, Thilo
Smartphone-Based Pelvic Movement Asymmetry Measures for Clinical Decision Making in Equine Lameness Assessment
title Smartphone-Based Pelvic Movement Asymmetry Measures for Clinical Decision Making in Equine Lameness Assessment
title_full Smartphone-Based Pelvic Movement Asymmetry Measures for Clinical Decision Making in Equine Lameness Assessment
title_fullStr Smartphone-Based Pelvic Movement Asymmetry Measures for Clinical Decision Making in Equine Lameness Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Smartphone-Based Pelvic Movement Asymmetry Measures for Clinical Decision Making in Equine Lameness Assessment
title_short Smartphone-Based Pelvic Movement Asymmetry Measures for Clinical Decision Making in Equine Lameness Assessment
title_sort smartphone-based pelvic movement asymmetry measures for clinical decision making in equine lameness assessment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8228485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34204921
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11061665
work_keys_str_mv AT marunovaeva smartphonebasedpelvicmovementasymmetrymeasuresforclinicaldecisionmakinginequinelamenessassessment
AT dodleea smartphonebasedpelvicmovementasymmetrymeasuresforclinicaldecisionmakinginequinelamenessassessment
AT wittestefan smartphonebasedpelvicmovementasymmetrymeasuresforclinicaldecisionmakinginequinelamenessassessment
AT pfauthilo smartphonebasedpelvicmovementasymmetrymeasuresforclinicaldecisionmakinginequinelamenessassessment