Cargando…

Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT in Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Lung cancer continues to be one of the main causes of cancer death in Europe. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has shown high potential for screening of lung cancer in smokers, most recently in two European trials. The aim of this review was to assess lung cancer screening of smokers by LDCT with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hunger, Theresa, Wanka-Pail, Eva, Brix, Gunnar, Griebel, Jürgen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8228723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34198856
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11061040
_version_ 1783712809266184192
author Hunger, Theresa
Wanka-Pail, Eva
Brix, Gunnar
Griebel, Jürgen
author_facet Hunger, Theresa
Wanka-Pail, Eva
Brix, Gunnar
Griebel, Jürgen
author_sort Hunger, Theresa
collection PubMed
description Lung cancer continues to be one of the main causes of cancer death in Europe. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has shown high potential for screening of lung cancer in smokers, most recently in two European trials. The aim of this review was to assess lung cancer screening of smokers by LDCT with respect to clinical effectiveness, radiological procedures, quality of life, and changes in smoking behavior. We searched electronic databases in April 2020 for publications of randomized controlled trials (RCT) reporting on lung cancer and overall mortality, lung cancer morbidity, and harms of LDCT screening. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate effects on mortality. Forty-three publications on 10 RCTs were included. The meta-analysis of eight studies showed a statistically significant relative reduction of lung cancer mortality of 12% in the screening group (risk ratio = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.79–0.97). Between 4% and 24% of screening-LDCT scans were classified as positive, and 84–96% of them turned out to be false positive. The risk of overdiagnosis was estimated between 19% and 69% of diagnosed lung cancers. Lung cancer screening can reduce disease-specific mortality in (former) smokers when stringent requirements and quality standards for performance are met.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8228723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82287232021-06-26 Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT in Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Hunger, Theresa Wanka-Pail, Eva Brix, Gunnar Griebel, Jürgen Diagnostics (Basel) Review Lung cancer continues to be one of the main causes of cancer death in Europe. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has shown high potential for screening of lung cancer in smokers, most recently in two European trials. The aim of this review was to assess lung cancer screening of smokers by LDCT with respect to clinical effectiveness, radiological procedures, quality of life, and changes in smoking behavior. We searched electronic databases in April 2020 for publications of randomized controlled trials (RCT) reporting on lung cancer and overall mortality, lung cancer morbidity, and harms of LDCT screening. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate effects on mortality. Forty-three publications on 10 RCTs were included. The meta-analysis of eight studies showed a statistically significant relative reduction of lung cancer mortality of 12% in the screening group (risk ratio = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.79–0.97). Between 4% and 24% of screening-LDCT scans were classified as positive, and 84–96% of them turned out to be false positive. The risk of overdiagnosis was estimated between 19% and 69% of diagnosed lung cancers. Lung cancer screening can reduce disease-specific mortality in (former) smokers when stringent requirements and quality standards for performance are met. MDPI 2021-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8228723/ /pubmed/34198856 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11061040 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Hunger, Theresa
Wanka-Pail, Eva
Brix, Gunnar
Griebel, Jürgen
Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT in Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT in Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT in Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT in Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT in Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT in Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort lung cancer screening with low-dose ct in smokers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8228723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34198856
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11061040
work_keys_str_mv AT hungertheresa lungcancerscreeningwithlowdosectinsmokersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wankapaileva lungcancerscreeningwithlowdosectinsmokersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT brixgunnar lungcancerscreeningwithlowdosectinsmokersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT griebeljurgen lungcancerscreeningwithlowdosectinsmokersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis