Cargando…
Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT in Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Lung cancer continues to be one of the main causes of cancer death in Europe. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has shown high potential for screening of lung cancer in smokers, most recently in two European trials. The aim of this review was to assess lung cancer screening of smokers by LDCT with...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8228723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34198856 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11061040 |
_version_ | 1783712809266184192 |
---|---|
author | Hunger, Theresa Wanka-Pail, Eva Brix, Gunnar Griebel, Jürgen |
author_facet | Hunger, Theresa Wanka-Pail, Eva Brix, Gunnar Griebel, Jürgen |
author_sort | Hunger, Theresa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lung cancer continues to be one of the main causes of cancer death in Europe. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has shown high potential for screening of lung cancer in smokers, most recently in two European trials. The aim of this review was to assess lung cancer screening of smokers by LDCT with respect to clinical effectiveness, radiological procedures, quality of life, and changes in smoking behavior. We searched electronic databases in April 2020 for publications of randomized controlled trials (RCT) reporting on lung cancer and overall mortality, lung cancer morbidity, and harms of LDCT screening. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate effects on mortality. Forty-three publications on 10 RCTs were included. The meta-analysis of eight studies showed a statistically significant relative reduction of lung cancer mortality of 12% in the screening group (risk ratio = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.79–0.97). Between 4% and 24% of screening-LDCT scans were classified as positive, and 84–96% of them turned out to be false positive. The risk of overdiagnosis was estimated between 19% and 69% of diagnosed lung cancers. Lung cancer screening can reduce disease-specific mortality in (former) smokers when stringent requirements and quality standards for performance are met. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8228723 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82287232021-06-26 Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT in Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Hunger, Theresa Wanka-Pail, Eva Brix, Gunnar Griebel, Jürgen Diagnostics (Basel) Review Lung cancer continues to be one of the main causes of cancer death in Europe. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has shown high potential for screening of lung cancer in smokers, most recently in two European trials. The aim of this review was to assess lung cancer screening of smokers by LDCT with respect to clinical effectiveness, radiological procedures, quality of life, and changes in smoking behavior. We searched electronic databases in April 2020 for publications of randomized controlled trials (RCT) reporting on lung cancer and overall mortality, lung cancer morbidity, and harms of LDCT screening. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate effects on mortality. Forty-three publications on 10 RCTs were included. The meta-analysis of eight studies showed a statistically significant relative reduction of lung cancer mortality of 12% in the screening group (risk ratio = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.79–0.97). Between 4% and 24% of screening-LDCT scans were classified as positive, and 84–96% of them turned out to be false positive. The risk of overdiagnosis was estimated between 19% and 69% of diagnosed lung cancers. Lung cancer screening can reduce disease-specific mortality in (former) smokers when stringent requirements and quality standards for performance are met. MDPI 2021-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8228723/ /pubmed/34198856 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11061040 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Hunger, Theresa Wanka-Pail, Eva Brix, Gunnar Griebel, Jürgen Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT in Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT in Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT in Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT in Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT in Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT in Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | lung cancer screening with low-dose ct in smokers: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8228723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34198856 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11061040 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hungertheresa lungcancerscreeningwithlowdosectinsmokersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wankapaileva lungcancerscreeningwithlowdosectinsmokersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT brixgunnar lungcancerscreeningwithlowdosectinsmokersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT griebeljurgen lungcancerscreeningwithlowdosectinsmokersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |