Cargando…

Milk-Fat Intake and Differences in Abdominal Adiposity and BMI: Evidence Based on 13,544 Randomly-Selected Adults

The primary purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the relationship between milk-fat intake and obesity, particularly abdominal obesity, in 13,544 U.S. adults. A lesser objective was to measure the degree to which the association was influenced by multiple potential confounding variables. Thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilkinson, Klarissa R., Tucker, Larry A., Davidson, Lance E., Bailey, Bruce W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8228755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34072074
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13061832
_version_ 1783712816791814144
author Wilkinson, Klarissa R.
Tucker, Larry A.
Davidson, Lance E.
Bailey, Bruce W.
author_facet Wilkinson, Klarissa R.
Tucker, Larry A.
Davidson, Lance E.
Bailey, Bruce W.
author_sort Wilkinson, Klarissa R.
collection PubMed
description The primary purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the relationship between milk-fat intake and obesity, particularly abdominal obesity, in 13,544 U.S. adults. A lesser objective was to measure the degree to which the association was influenced by multiple potential confounding variables. This cross-sectional study used data from the 2011–2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Quantity of milk-fat regularly consumed was the exposure variable. Sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD), a measure of abdominal obesity, and body mass index (BMI) were the outcome variables. Sagittal abdominal diameter is a strong predictor of visceral abdominal fat, when measured by computed tomography, and has been shown to predict cardiometabolic disorders better than BMI. After controlling for age, race, gender, physical activity, leisure computer use and gaming, alcohol habits, and cigarette use, significantly lower BMIs were associated with consistent non-fat and full-fat milk consumption (F = 4.1, p = 0.0063). A significantly lower SAD was associated only with regular consumption of non-fat milk (F = 5.0, p = 0.0019). No significant differences were detected between the other milk-fat groups or milk abstainers. In this nationally representative sample, only 19.6% of adults regularly consumed low-fat milk. In conclusion, consistent non-fat milk intake was predictive of lower levels of abdominal adiposity compared to consumption of higher levels of milk-fat.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8228755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82287552021-06-26 Milk-Fat Intake and Differences in Abdominal Adiposity and BMI: Evidence Based on 13,544 Randomly-Selected Adults Wilkinson, Klarissa R. Tucker, Larry A. Davidson, Lance E. Bailey, Bruce W. Nutrients Article The primary purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the relationship between milk-fat intake and obesity, particularly abdominal obesity, in 13,544 U.S. adults. A lesser objective was to measure the degree to which the association was influenced by multiple potential confounding variables. This cross-sectional study used data from the 2011–2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Quantity of milk-fat regularly consumed was the exposure variable. Sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD), a measure of abdominal obesity, and body mass index (BMI) were the outcome variables. Sagittal abdominal diameter is a strong predictor of visceral abdominal fat, when measured by computed tomography, and has been shown to predict cardiometabolic disorders better than BMI. After controlling for age, race, gender, physical activity, leisure computer use and gaming, alcohol habits, and cigarette use, significantly lower BMIs were associated with consistent non-fat and full-fat milk consumption (F = 4.1, p = 0.0063). A significantly lower SAD was associated only with regular consumption of non-fat milk (F = 5.0, p = 0.0019). No significant differences were detected between the other milk-fat groups or milk abstainers. In this nationally representative sample, only 19.6% of adults regularly consumed low-fat milk. In conclusion, consistent non-fat milk intake was predictive of lower levels of abdominal adiposity compared to consumption of higher levels of milk-fat. MDPI 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8228755/ /pubmed/34072074 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13061832 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wilkinson, Klarissa R.
Tucker, Larry A.
Davidson, Lance E.
Bailey, Bruce W.
Milk-Fat Intake and Differences in Abdominal Adiposity and BMI: Evidence Based on 13,544 Randomly-Selected Adults
title Milk-Fat Intake and Differences in Abdominal Adiposity and BMI: Evidence Based on 13,544 Randomly-Selected Adults
title_full Milk-Fat Intake and Differences in Abdominal Adiposity and BMI: Evidence Based on 13,544 Randomly-Selected Adults
title_fullStr Milk-Fat Intake and Differences in Abdominal Adiposity and BMI: Evidence Based on 13,544 Randomly-Selected Adults
title_full_unstemmed Milk-Fat Intake and Differences in Abdominal Adiposity and BMI: Evidence Based on 13,544 Randomly-Selected Adults
title_short Milk-Fat Intake and Differences in Abdominal Adiposity and BMI: Evidence Based on 13,544 Randomly-Selected Adults
title_sort milk-fat intake and differences in abdominal adiposity and bmi: evidence based on 13,544 randomly-selected adults
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8228755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34072074
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13061832
work_keys_str_mv AT wilkinsonklarissar milkfatintakeanddifferencesinabdominaladiposityandbmievidencebasedon13544randomlyselectedadults
AT tuckerlarrya milkfatintakeanddifferencesinabdominaladiposityandbmievidencebasedon13544randomlyselectedadults
AT davidsonlancee milkfatintakeanddifferencesinabdominaladiposityandbmievidencebasedon13544randomlyselectedadults
AT baileybrucew milkfatintakeanddifferencesinabdominaladiposityandbmievidencebasedon13544randomlyselectedadults