Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of remdesivir in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of remdesivir, an RNA polymerase inhibitor, for effectiveness in adults with COVID-19. DATA SOURCES: Electronic search for eligible articles of PubMed, Cochrane Central and clinicaltrials.gov was performed on 20 September 2020. PARTICIPANTS AND STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Only...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8228818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34168031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048416 |
_version_ | 1783712831408963584 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Surjit Khera, Daisy Chugh, Ankita Khera, Pushpinder Singh Chugh, Vinay Kumar |
author_facet | Singh, Surjit Khera, Daisy Chugh, Ankita Khera, Pushpinder Singh Chugh, Vinay Kumar |
author_sort | Singh, Surjit |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of remdesivir, an RNA polymerase inhibitor, for effectiveness in adults with COVID-19. DATA SOURCES: Electronic search for eligible articles of PubMed, Cochrane Central and clinicaltrials.gov was performed on 20 September 2020. PARTICIPANTS AND STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating efficacy of remdesivir in COVID-19 were included for meta-analysis. INTERVENTIONS: Remdesivir was compared with standard of care. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Primary outcome was mortality and secondary outcomes were time to clinical improvement and safety outcomes like serious adverse events, respiratory failure. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Data synthesis was done with Cochrane review manager 5 (RevMan) V.5.3. Cochrane risk of bias V.2.0 tool was used for methodological quality assessment. The GRADE pro GDT was applied for overall quality of evidence. RESULTS: 52 RCTs were screened and 4 studies were included in analysis, with total of 7324 patients. No mortality benefit was observed with remdesivir versus control group (OR=0.92 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.07), p=0.30, moderate quality evidence). Significantly higher rates of clinical improvement (OR=1.52 (95% CI 1.24 to 1.87), p<0.0001, low quality) and faster time to clinical improvement (HR=1.28 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.46), p=0.0002, very low quality) was observed with remdesivir versus control group. Significant decrease was found in the risk of serious adverse events (RR=0.75 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.90), p=0.0003, low quality); however, no difference was found in the risk of respiratory failure (RR=0.85 (95% CI 0.41 to 1.77), p=0.67, very low quality evidence) with remdesivir. CONCLUSIONS: As per the evidence from current review, remdesivir has shown no mortality benefit (moderate quality evidence) in the treatment of COVID-19. From a cost–benefit perspective, it is our personal opinion that it should not be recommended for use, especially in low and lower middle income countries. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020189517. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8228818 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82288182021-06-28 Efficacy and safety of remdesivir in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis Singh, Surjit Khera, Daisy Chugh, Ankita Khera, Pushpinder Singh Chugh, Vinay Kumar BMJ Open Infectious Diseases OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of remdesivir, an RNA polymerase inhibitor, for effectiveness in adults with COVID-19. DATA SOURCES: Electronic search for eligible articles of PubMed, Cochrane Central and clinicaltrials.gov was performed on 20 September 2020. PARTICIPANTS AND STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating efficacy of remdesivir in COVID-19 were included for meta-analysis. INTERVENTIONS: Remdesivir was compared with standard of care. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Primary outcome was mortality and secondary outcomes were time to clinical improvement and safety outcomes like serious adverse events, respiratory failure. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Data synthesis was done with Cochrane review manager 5 (RevMan) V.5.3. Cochrane risk of bias V.2.0 tool was used for methodological quality assessment. The GRADE pro GDT was applied for overall quality of evidence. RESULTS: 52 RCTs were screened and 4 studies were included in analysis, with total of 7324 patients. No mortality benefit was observed with remdesivir versus control group (OR=0.92 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.07), p=0.30, moderate quality evidence). Significantly higher rates of clinical improvement (OR=1.52 (95% CI 1.24 to 1.87), p<0.0001, low quality) and faster time to clinical improvement (HR=1.28 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.46), p=0.0002, very low quality) was observed with remdesivir versus control group. Significant decrease was found in the risk of serious adverse events (RR=0.75 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.90), p=0.0003, low quality); however, no difference was found in the risk of respiratory failure (RR=0.85 (95% CI 0.41 to 1.77), p=0.67, very low quality evidence) with remdesivir. CONCLUSIONS: As per the evidence from current review, remdesivir has shown no mortality benefit (moderate quality evidence) in the treatment of COVID-19. From a cost–benefit perspective, it is our personal opinion that it should not be recommended for use, especially in low and lower middle income countries. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020189517. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8228818/ /pubmed/34168031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048416 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Infectious Diseases Singh, Surjit Khera, Daisy Chugh, Ankita Khera, Pushpinder Singh Chugh, Vinay Kumar Efficacy and safety of remdesivir in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy and safety of remdesivir in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of remdesivir in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of remdesivir in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of remdesivir in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of remdesivir in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of remdesivir in covid-19 caused by sars-cov-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Infectious Diseases |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8228818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34168031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048416 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhsurjit efficacyandsafetyofremdesivirincovid19causedbysarscov2asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kheradaisy efficacyandsafetyofremdesivirincovid19causedbysarscov2asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chughankita efficacyandsafetyofremdesivirincovid19causedbysarscov2asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kherapushpindersingh efficacyandsafetyofremdesivirincovid19causedbysarscov2asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chughvinaykumar efficacyandsafetyofremdesivirincovid19causedbysarscov2asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |