Cargando…

Challenges for Cryptosporidium Population Studies

Cryptosporidiosis is ranked sixth in the list of the most important food-borne parasites globally, and it is an important contributor to mortality in infants and the immunosuppressed. Recently, the number of genome sequences available for this parasite has increased drastically. The majority of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baptista, Rodrigo P., Cooper, Garrett W., Kissinger, Jessica C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8229070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34200631
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes12060894
_version_ 1783712890947108864
author Baptista, Rodrigo P.
Cooper, Garrett W.
Kissinger, Jessica C.
author_facet Baptista, Rodrigo P.
Cooper, Garrett W.
Kissinger, Jessica C.
author_sort Baptista, Rodrigo P.
collection PubMed
description Cryptosporidiosis is ranked sixth in the list of the most important food-borne parasites globally, and it is an important contributor to mortality in infants and the immunosuppressed. Recently, the number of genome sequences available for this parasite has increased drastically. The majority of the sequences are derived from population studies of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium hominis, the most important species causing disease in humans. Work with this parasite is challenging since it lacks an optimal, prolonged, in vitro culture system, which accurately reproduces the in vivo life cycle. This obstacle makes the cloning of isolates nearly impossible. Thus, patient isolates that are sequenced represent a population or, at times, mixed infections. Oocysts, the lifecycle stage currently used for sequencing, must be considered a population even if the sequence is derived from single-cell sequencing of a single oocyst because each oocyst contains four haploid meiotic progeny (sporozoites). Additionally, the community does not yet have a set of universal markers for strain typing that are distributed across all chromosomes. These variables pose challenges for population studies and require careful analyses to avoid biased interpretation. This review presents an overview of existing population studies, challenges, and potential solutions to facilitate future population analyses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8229070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82290702021-06-26 Challenges for Cryptosporidium Population Studies Baptista, Rodrigo P. Cooper, Garrett W. Kissinger, Jessica C. Genes (Basel) Review Cryptosporidiosis is ranked sixth in the list of the most important food-borne parasites globally, and it is an important contributor to mortality in infants and the immunosuppressed. Recently, the number of genome sequences available for this parasite has increased drastically. The majority of the sequences are derived from population studies of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium hominis, the most important species causing disease in humans. Work with this parasite is challenging since it lacks an optimal, prolonged, in vitro culture system, which accurately reproduces the in vivo life cycle. This obstacle makes the cloning of isolates nearly impossible. Thus, patient isolates that are sequenced represent a population or, at times, mixed infections. Oocysts, the lifecycle stage currently used for sequencing, must be considered a population even if the sequence is derived from single-cell sequencing of a single oocyst because each oocyst contains four haploid meiotic progeny (sporozoites). Additionally, the community does not yet have a set of universal markers for strain typing that are distributed across all chromosomes. These variables pose challenges for population studies and require careful analyses to avoid biased interpretation. This review presents an overview of existing population studies, challenges, and potential solutions to facilitate future population analyses. MDPI 2021-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8229070/ /pubmed/34200631 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes12060894 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Baptista, Rodrigo P.
Cooper, Garrett W.
Kissinger, Jessica C.
Challenges for Cryptosporidium Population Studies
title Challenges for Cryptosporidium Population Studies
title_full Challenges for Cryptosporidium Population Studies
title_fullStr Challenges for Cryptosporidium Population Studies
title_full_unstemmed Challenges for Cryptosporidium Population Studies
title_short Challenges for Cryptosporidium Population Studies
title_sort challenges for cryptosporidium population studies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8229070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34200631
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes12060894
work_keys_str_mv AT baptistarodrigop challengesforcryptosporidiumpopulationstudies
AT coopergarrettw challengesforcryptosporidiumpopulationstudies
AT kissingerjessicac challengesforcryptosporidiumpopulationstudies