Image Registration of (18)F-FDG PET/CT Using the MotionFree Algorithm and CT Protocols through Phantom Study and Clinical Evaluation

We evaluated the benefits of the MotionFree algorithm through phantom and patient studies. The various sizes of phantom and vacuum vials were linked to RPM moving with or without MotionFree application. A total of 600 patients were divided into six groups by breathing protocols and CT scanning time. Breathing protocols were applied as follows: (a) patients who underwent scanning without any breathing instructions; (b) patients who were instructed to hold their breath after expiration during CT scan; and (c) patients who were instructed to breathe naturally. The length of PET/CT misregistration was measured and we defined the misregistration when it exceeded 10 mm. In the phantom tests, the images produced by the MotionFree algorithm were observed to have excellent agreement with static images. There were significant differences in PET/CT misregistration according to CT scanning time and each breathing protocol. When applying the type (c) protocol, decreasing the CT scanning time significantly reduced the frequency and length of misregistrations (p < 0.05). The MotionFree application is able to correct respiratory motion artifacts and to accurately quantify lesions. The shorter time of CT scan can reduce the frequency, and the natural breathing protocol also decreases the lengths of misregistrations.