Cargando…

Impact of Prior Influenza and Pneumoccocal Vaccines on Humoral and Cellular Response to SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 Vaccination

Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is considered the most effective method of prevention to contain the pandemic. While highly effective SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are being applied on a large-scale, whether and to what extent the strength of the vaccine-induced immune response could be further potentiated is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Puro, Vincenzo, Castilletti, Concetta, Agrati, Chiara, Goletti, Delia, Leone, Sara, Agresta, Alessandro, Cimini, Eleonora, Tartaglia, Eleonora, Casetti, Rita, Colavita, Francesca, Meschi, Silvia, Matusali, Giulia, Lapa, Daniele, Najafi Fard, Saeid, Aiello, Alessandra, Farrone, Chiara, Gallì, Paola, Capobianchi, Maria Rosaria, Ippolito, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8229609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34201065
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060615
_version_ 1783713018139377664
author Puro, Vincenzo
Castilletti, Concetta
Agrati, Chiara
Goletti, Delia
Leone, Sara
Agresta, Alessandro
Cimini, Eleonora
Tartaglia, Eleonora
Casetti, Rita
Colavita, Francesca
Meschi, Silvia
Matusali, Giulia
Lapa, Daniele
Najafi Fard, Saeid
Aiello, Alessandra
Farrone, Chiara
Gallì, Paola
Capobianchi, Maria Rosaria
Ippolito, Giuseppe
author_facet Puro, Vincenzo
Castilletti, Concetta
Agrati, Chiara
Goletti, Delia
Leone, Sara
Agresta, Alessandro
Cimini, Eleonora
Tartaglia, Eleonora
Casetti, Rita
Colavita, Francesca
Meschi, Silvia
Matusali, Giulia
Lapa, Daniele
Najafi Fard, Saeid
Aiello, Alessandra
Farrone, Chiara
Gallì, Paola
Capobianchi, Maria Rosaria
Ippolito, Giuseppe
author_sort Puro, Vincenzo
collection PubMed
description Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is considered the most effective method of prevention to contain the pandemic. While highly effective SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are being applied on a large-scale, whether and to what extent the strength of the vaccine-induced immune response could be further potentiated is still an object of debate. Several reports studied the effect of different vaccines on the susceptibility and mortality of COVID-19, with conflicting results. We aimed to evaluate whether previous influenza and/or pneumococcal vaccination had an impact on the specific immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. The study population consists of 710 workers from our Institute who completed the BNT162b2 schedule and have been tested at least once after the second dose, from 27 December 2020 up to 15 April 2021. Of these, 152 (21.4%) had received an influenza and 215 (30.3%) a concomitant influenza and pneumococcal vaccination, a median of 102 days before the second dose of BNT162b2. Overall, 100% of workers were tested for anti-Spike receptor-binding domain (anti-S/RBD) antibodies, 224 workers for neutralization titer (Micro-neutralization assay, MNA), and 155 workers for a spike-specific T cell interferon-γ response (IFN-γ). The levels of anti-S/RBD, MNA and IFN-γ were evaluated and compared according to sex, age, involvement in direct care of COVID-19 patients, and previous influenza/pneumococcal vaccination. At the univariate analysis, no statistically significant association was observed with regard to a previous influenza and pneumococcal vaccination. A significant lower anti-S/RBD response was observed according to an older age and male sex, while MNA titers were significantly associated to sex but not to age. At the multivariable analysis, workers receiving a concomitant influenza and pneumococcal vaccination or only influenza showed a 58% (p 0.01) and 42% (p 0.07) increase in MNA titers, respectively, compared to those who did not receive an influenza/pneumococcal vaccination. Female workers showed an 81% MNA and a 44% anti-S/RBD increase compared to male workers (p < 0.001). Compared to workers aged 21 to 49 years, those aged 50 or older were associated with a reduction in the anti-S/RBD (16%; p 0.005), MNA (31%; p 0.019), and IFN.g (32%) immune response. Maintaining the influenza and pneumococcal immunization program for the coming season, in which COVID-19 could still be spreading, remains strongly recommended to protect those who are more vulnerable and to limit the potential burden of these infections on the healthcare system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8229609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82296092021-06-26 Impact of Prior Influenza and Pneumoccocal Vaccines on Humoral and Cellular Response to SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 Vaccination Puro, Vincenzo Castilletti, Concetta Agrati, Chiara Goletti, Delia Leone, Sara Agresta, Alessandro Cimini, Eleonora Tartaglia, Eleonora Casetti, Rita Colavita, Francesca Meschi, Silvia Matusali, Giulia Lapa, Daniele Najafi Fard, Saeid Aiello, Alessandra Farrone, Chiara Gallì, Paola Capobianchi, Maria Rosaria Ippolito, Giuseppe Vaccines (Basel) Brief Report Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is considered the most effective method of prevention to contain the pandemic. While highly effective SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are being applied on a large-scale, whether and to what extent the strength of the vaccine-induced immune response could be further potentiated is still an object of debate. Several reports studied the effect of different vaccines on the susceptibility and mortality of COVID-19, with conflicting results. We aimed to evaluate whether previous influenza and/or pneumococcal vaccination had an impact on the specific immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. The study population consists of 710 workers from our Institute who completed the BNT162b2 schedule and have been tested at least once after the second dose, from 27 December 2020 up to 15 April 2021. Of these, 152 (21.4%) had received an influenza and 215 (30.3%) a concomitant influenza and pneumococcal vaccination, a median of 102 days before the second dose of BNT162b2. Overall, 100% of workers were tested for anti-Spike receptor-binding domain (anti-S/RBD) antibodies, 224 workers for neutralization titer (Micro-neutralization assay, MNA), and 155 workers for a spike-specific T cell interferon-γ response (IFN-γ). The levels of anti-S/RBD, MNA and IFN-γ were evaluated and compared according to sex, age, involvement in direct care of COVID-19 patients, and previous influenza/pneumococcal vaccination. At the univariate analysis, no statistically significant association was observed with regard to a previous influenza and pneumococcal vaccination. A significant lower anti-S/RBD response was observed according to an older age and male sex, while MNA titers were significantly associated to sex but not to age. At the multivariable analysis, workers receiving a concomitant influenza and pneumococcal vaccination or only influenza showed a 58% (p 0.01) and 42% (p 0.07) increase in MNA titers, respectively, compared to those who did not receive an influenza/pneumococcal vaccination. Female workers showed an 81% MNA and a 44% anti-S/RBD increase compared to male workers (p < 0.001). Compared to workers aged 21 to 49 years, those aged 50 or older were associated with a reduction in the anti-S/RBD (16%; p 0.005), MNA (31%; p 0.019), and IFN.g (32%) immune response. Maintaining the influenza and pneumococcal immunization program for the coming season, in which COVID-19 could still be spreading, remains strongly recommended to protect those who are more vulnerable and to limit the potential burden of these infections on the healthcare system. MDPI 2021-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8229609/ /pubmed/34201065 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060615 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief Report
Puro, Vincenzo
Castilletti, Concetta
Agrati, Chiara
Goletti, Delia
Leone, Sara
Agresta, Alessandro
Cimini, Eleonora
Tartaglia, Eleonora
Casetti, Rita
Colavita, Francesca
Meschi, Silvia
Matusali, Giulia
Lapa, Daniele
Najafi Fard, Saeid
Aiello, Alessandra
Farrone, Chiara
Gallì, Paola
Capobianchi, Maria Rosaria
Ippolito, Giuseppe
Impact of Prior Influenza and Pneumoccocal Vaccines on Humoral and Cellular Response to SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 Vaccination
title Impact of Prior Influenza and Pneumoccocal Vaccines on Humoral and Cellular Response to SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 Vaccination
title_full Impact of Prior Influenza and Pneumoccocal Vaccines on Humoral and Cellular Response to SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 Vaccination
title_fullStr Impact of Prior Influenza and Pneumoccocal Vaccines on Humoral and Cellular Response to SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 Vaccination
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Prior Influenza and Pneumoccocal Vaccines on Humoral and Cellular Response to SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 Vaccination
title_short Impact of Prior Influenza and Pneumoccocal Vaccines on Humoral and Cellular Response to SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 Vaccination
title_sort impact of prior influenza and pneumoccocal vaccines on humoral and cellular response to sars-cov-2 bnt162b2 vaccination
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8229609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34201065
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060615
work_keys_str_mv AT purovincenzo impactofpriorinfluenzaandpneumoccocalvaccinesonhumoralandcellularresponsetosarscov2bnt162b2vaccination
AT castilletticoncetta impactofpriorinfluenzaandpneumoccocalvaccinesonhumoralandcellularresponsetosarscov2bnt162b2vaccination
AT agratichiara impactofpriorinfluenzaandpneumoccocalvaccinesonhumoralandcellularresponsetosarscov2bnt162b2vaccination
AT golettidelia impactofpriorinfluenzaandpneumoccocalvaccinesonhumoralandcellularresponsetosarscov2bnt162b2vaccination
AT leonesara impactofpriorinfluenzaandpneumoccocalvaccinesonhumoralandcellularresponsetosarscov2bnt162b2vaccination
AT agrestaalessandro impactofpriorinfluenzaandpneumoccocalvaccinesonhumoralandcellularresponsetosarscov2bnt162b2vaccination
AT ciminieleonora impactofpriorinfluenzaandpneumoccocalvaccinesonhumoralandcellularresponsetosarscov2bnt162b2vaccination
AT tartagliaeleonora impactofpriorinfluenzaandpneumoccocalvaccinesonhumoralandcellularresponsetosarscov2bnt162b2vaccination
AT casettirita impactofpriorinfluenzaandpneumoccocalvaccinesonhumoralandcellularresponsetosarscov2bnt162b2vaccination
AT colavitafrancesca impactofpriorinfluenzaandpneumoccocalvaccinesonhumoralandcellularresponsetosarscov2bnt162b2vaccination
AT meschisilvia impactofpriorinfluenzaandpneumoccocalvaccinesonhumoralandcellularresponsetosarscov2bnt162b2vaccination
AT matusaligiulia impactofpriorinfluenzaandpneumoccocalvaccinesonhumoralandcellularresponsetosarscov2bnt162b2vaccination
AT lapadaniele impactofpriorinfluenzaandpneumoccocalvaccinesonhumoralandcellularresponsetosarscov2bnt162b2vaccination
AT najafifardsaeid impactofpriorinfluenzaandpneumoccocalvaccinesonhumoralandcellularresponsetosarscov2bnt162b2vaccination
AT aielloalessandra impactofpriorinfluenzaandpneumoccocalvaccinesonhumoralandcellularresponsetosarscov2bnt162b2vaccination
AT farronechiara impactofpriorinfluenzaandpneumoccocalvaccinesonhumoralandcellularresponsetosarscov2bnt162b2vaccination
AT gallipaola impactofpriorinfluenzaandpneumoccocalvaccinesonhumoralandcellularresponsetosarscov2bnt162b2vaccination
AT capobianchimariarosaria impactofpriorinfluenzaandpneumoccocalvaccinesonhumoralandcellularresponsetosarscov2bnt162b2vaccination
AT ippolitogiuseppe impactofpriorinfluenzaandpneumoccocalvaccinesonhumoralandcellularresponsetosarscov2bnt162b2vaccination
AT impactofpriorinfluenzaandpneumoccocalvaccinesonhumoralandcellularresponsetosarscov2bnt162b2vaccination