Cargando…

Measurement of Exhaled Nitric Oxide in 456 Lung Cancer Patients Using a Ringdown FENO Analyzer

The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical value of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) for diagnosing lung cancer patients by using a relatively large sample. An online and near-real-time ringdown exhaled NO analyzer calibrated by an electrochemical sensor at clinical was used for breath ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jing, Li, Qingyuan, Wei, Xin, Chen, Qing, Sun, Meixiu, Li, Yingxin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8230208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34072964
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo11060352
_version_ 1783713154131296256
author Li, Jing
Li, Qingyuan
Wei, Xin
Chen, Qing
Sun, Meixiu
Li, Yingxin
author_facet Li, Jing
Li, Qingyuan
Wei, Xin
Chen, Qing
Sun, Meixiu
Li, Yingxin
author_sort Li, Jing
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical value of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) for diagnosing lung cancer patients by using a relatively large sample. An online and near-real-time ringdown exhaled NO analyzer calibrated by an electrochemical sensor at clinical was used for breath analysis. A total of 740 breath samples from 284 healthy control subjects (H) and 456 lung cancer patients (LC) were collected. The recorded data included exhaled NO, medications taken within the last half month, demographics, fasting status and smoking status. The LC had a significantly higher level of exhaled NO than the H (H: 21.0 ± 12.1 ppb vs. LC: 34.1 ± 17.2 ppb). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for exhaled NO predicting LC and H was 0.728 (sensitivity was 0.798; specificity was 0.55). There was no significant difference in exhaled NO level between groups divided by different types of LC, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage, sex, smoking status, age, body mass index (BMI) or fasting status. Exhaled NO level alone is not a useful clinical tool for identifying lung cancer, but it should be considered when developing a diagnosis model of lung cancer by using breath analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8230208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82302082021-06-26 Measurement of Exhaled Nitric Oxide in 456 Lung Cancer Patients Using a Ringdown FENO Analyzer Li, Jing Li, Qingyuan Wei, Xin Chen, Qing Sun, Meixiu Li, Yingxin Metabolites Article The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical value of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) for diagnosing lung cancer patients by using a relatively large sample. An online and near-real-time ringdown exhaled NO analyzer calibrated by an electrochemical sensor at clinical was used for breath analysis. A total of 740 breath samples from 284 healthy control subjects (H) and 456 lung cancer patients (LC) were collected. The recorded data included exhaled NO, medications taken within the last half month, demographics, fasting status and smoking status. The LC had a significantly higher level of exhaled NO than the H (H: 21.0 ± 12.1 ppb vs. LC: 34.1 ± 17.2 ppb). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for exhaled NO predicting LC and H was 0.728 (sensitivity was 0.798; specificity was 0.55). There was no significant difference in exhaled NO level between groups divided by different types of LC, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage, sex, smoking status, age, body mass index (BMI) or fasting status. Exhaled NO level alone is not a useful clinical tool for identifying lung cancer, but it should be considered when developing a diagnosis model of lung cancer by using breath analysis. MDPI 2021-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8230208/ /pubmed/34072964 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo11060352 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Jing
Li, Qingyuan
Wei, Xin
Chen, Qing
Sun, Meixiu
Li, Yingxin
Measurement of Exhaled Nitric Oxide in 456 Lung Cancer Patients Using a Ringdown FENO Analyzer
title Measurement of Exhaled Nitric Oxide in 456 Lung Cancer Patients Using a Ringdown FENO Analyzer
title_full Measurement of Exhaled Nitric Oxide in 456 Lung Cancer Patients Using a Ringdown FENO Analyzer
title_fullStr Measurement of Exhaled Nitric Oxide in 456 Lung Cancer Patients Using a Ringdown FENO Analyzer
title_full_unstemmed Measurement of Exhaled Nitric Oxide in 456 Lung Cancer Patients Using a Ringdown FENO Analyzer
title_short Measurement of Exhaled Nitric Oxide in 456 Lung Cancer Patients Using a Ringdown FENO Analyzer
title_sort measurement of exhaled nitric oxide in 456 lung cancer patients using a ringdown feno analyzer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8230208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34072964
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo11060352
work_keys_str_mv AT lijing measurementofexhalednitricoxidein456lungcancerpatientsusingaringdownfenoanalyzer
AT liqingyuan measurementofexhalednitricoxidein456lungcancerpatientsusingaringdownfenoanalyzer
AT weixin measurementofexhalednitricoxidein456lungcancerpatientsusingaringdownfenoanalyzer
AT chenqing measurementofexhalednitricoxidein456lungcancerpatientsusingaringdownfenoanalyzer
AT sunmeixiu measurementofexhalednitricoxidein456lungcancerpatientsusingaringdownfenoanalyzer
AT liyingxin measurementofexhalednitricoxidein456lungcancerpatientsusingaringdownfenoanalyzer