Cargando…

Cross-Species Comparisons of Nanoparticle Interactions with Innate Immune Systems: A Methodological Review

Many components of the innate immune system are evolutionarily conserved and shared across many living organisms, from plants and invertebrates to humans. Therefore, these shared features can allow the comparative study of potentially dangerous substances, such as engineered nanoparticles (NPs). How...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swartzwelter, Benjamin J., Mayall, Craig, Alijagic, Andi, Barbero, Francesco, Ferrari, Eleonora, Hernadi, Szabolcs, Michelini, Sara, Navarro Pacheco, Natividad Isabel, Prinelli, Alessandra, Swart, Elmer, Auguste, Manon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8230276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34207693
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11061528
_version_ 1783713170207014912
author Swartzwelter, Benjamin J.
Mayall, Craig
Alijagic, Andi
Barbero, Francesco
Ferrari, Eleonora
Hernadi, Szabolcs
Michelini, Sara
Navarro Pacheco, Natividad Isabel
Prinelli, Alessandra
Swart, Elmer
Auguste, Manon
author_facet Swartzwelter, Benjamin J.
Mayall, Craig
Alijagic, Andi
Barbero, Francesco
Ferrari, Eleonora
Hernadi, Szabolcs
Michelini, Sara
Navarro Pacheco, Natividad Isabel
Prinelli, Alessandra
Swart, Elmer
Auguste, Manon
author_sort Swartzwelter, Benjamin J.
collection PubMed
description Many components of the innate immune system are evolutionarily conserved and shared across many living organisms, from plants and invertebrates to humans. Therefore, these shared features can allow the comparative study of potentially dangerous substances, such as engineered nanoparticles (NPs). However, differences of methodology and procedure between diverse species and models make comparison of innate immune responses to NPs between organisms difficult in many cases. To this aim, this review provides an overview of suitable methods and assays that can be used to measure NP immune interactions across species in a multidisciplinary approach. The first part of this review describes the main innate immune defense characteristics of the selected models that can be associated to NPs exposure. In the second part, the different modes of exposure to NPs across models (considering isolated cells or whole organisms) and the main endpoints measured are discussed. In this synergistic perspective, we provide an overview of the current state of important cross-disciplinary immunological models to study NP-immune interactions and identify future research needs. As such, this paper could be used as a methodological reference point for future nano-immunosafety studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8230276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82302762021-06-26 Cross-Species Comparisons of Nanoparticle Interactions with Innate Immune Systems: A Methodological Review Swartzwelter, Benjamin J. Mayall, Craig Alijagic, Andi Barbero, Francesco Ferrari, Eleonora Hernadi, Szabolcs Michelini, Sara Navarro Pacheco, Natividad Isabel Prinelli, Alessandra Swart, Elmer Auguste, Manon Nanomaterials (Basel) Review Many components of the innate immune system are evolutionarily conserved and shared across many living organisms, from plants and invertebrates to humans. Therefore, these shared features can allow the comparative study of potentially dangerous substances, such as engineered nanoparticles (NPs). However, differences of methodology and procedure between diverse species and models make comparison of innate immune responses to NPs between organisms difficult in many cases. To this aim, this review provides an overview of suitable methods and assays that can be used to measure NP immune interactions across species in a multidisciplinary approach. The first part of this review describes the main innate immune defense characteristics of the selected models that can be associated to NPs exposure. In the second part, the different modes of exposure to NPs across models (considering isolated cells or whole organisms) and the main endpoints measured are discussed. In this synergistic perspective, we provide an overview of the current state of important cross-disciplinary immunological models to study NP-immune interactions and identify future research needs. As such, this paper could be used as a methodological reference point for future nano-immunosafety studies. MDPI 2021-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8230276/ /pubmed/34207693 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11061528 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Swartzwelter, Benjamin J.
Mayall, Craig
Alijagic, Andi
Barbero, Francesco
Ferrari, Eleonora
Hernadi, Szabolcs
Michelini, Sara
Navarro Pacheco, Natividad Isabel
Prinelli, Alessandra
Swart, Elmer
Auguste, Manon
Cross-Species Comparisons of Nanoparticle Interactions with Innate Immune Systems: A Methodological Review
title Cross-Species Comparisons of Nanoparticle Interactions with Innate Immune Systems: A Methodological Review
title_full Cross-Species Comparisons of Nanoparticle Interactions with Innate Immune Systems: A Methodological Review
title_fullStr Cross-Species Comparisons of Nanoparticle Interactions with Innate Immune Systems: A Methodological Review
title_full_unstemmed Cross-Species Comparisons of Nanoparticle Interactions with Innate Immune Systems: A Methodological Review
title_short Cross-Species Comparisons of Nanoparticle Interactions with Innate Immune Systems: A Methodological Review
title_sort cross-species comparisons of nanoparticle interactions with innate immune systems: a methodological review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8230276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34207693
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11061528
work_keys_str_mv AT swartzwelterbenjaminj crossspeciescomparisonsofnanoparticleinteractionswithinnateimmunesystemsamethodologicalreview
AT mayallcraig crossspeciescomparisonsofnanoparticleinteractionswithinnateimmunesystemsamethodologicalreview
AT alijagicandi crossspeciescomparisonsofnanoparticleinteractionswithinnateimmunesystemsamethodologicalreview
AT barberofrancesco crossspeciescomparisonsofnanoparticleinteractionswithinnateimmunesystemsamethodologicalreview
AT ferrarieleonora crossspeciescomparisonsofnanoparticleinteractionswithinnateimmunesystemsamethodologicalreview
AT hernadiszabolcs crossspeciescomparisonsofnanoparticleinteractionswithinnateimmunesystemsamethodologicalreview
AT michelinisara crossspeciescomparisonsofnanoparticleinteractionswithinnateimmunesystemsamethodologicalreview
AT navarropacheconatividadisabel crossspeciescomparisonsofnanoparticleinteractionswithinnateimmunesystemsamethodologicalreview
AT prinellialessandra crossspeciescomparisonsofnanoparticleinteractionswithinnateimmunesystemsamethodologicalreview
AT swartelmer crossspeciescomparisonsofnanoparticleinteractionswithinnateimmunesystemsamethodologicalreview
AT augustemanon crossspeciescomparisonsofnanoparticleinteractionswithinnateimmunesystemsamethodologicalreview