Cargando…

Radiological Risk to Human and Non-Human Biota Due to Radioactivity in Coastal Sand and Marine Sediments, Gulf of Oman

Natural and (137)Cs radioactivity in coastal marine sediment samples was measured using gamma spectrometry. Samples were collected at 16 locations from four beaches along the coastal area of Muscat City, Gulf of Oman. Radioactivity in beach sand was used to estimate the radiological risk parameters...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suliman, Ibrahim I., Alsafi, Khalid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8230884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34208166
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11060549
_version_ 1783713315178938368
author Suliman, Ibrahim I.
Alsafi, Khalid
author_facet Suliman, Ibrahim I.
Alsafi, Khalid
author_sort Suliman, Ibrahim I.
collection PubMed
description Natural and (137)Cs radioactivity in coastal marine sediment samples was measured using gamma spectrometry. Samples were collected at 16 locations from four beaches along the coastal area of Muscat City, Gulf of Oman. Radioactivity in beach sand was used to estimate the radiological risk parameters to humans, whereas the radioactivity in marine sediments was used to assess the radiological risk parameters to non-human biota, using the ERICA Tool. The average radioactivity concentrations (Bqkg(−1)) of (226)Ra, (232)Th, (40)K, (210)Pb and (137)Cs in sediments (sand) were as follows: 16.2 (16.3), 34.5(27.8), 54.7 (45.6), 46.8 (44.9) and 0.08 (0.10), respectively. In sand samples, the estimated average indoor ([Formula: see text]) and outdoor ([Formula: see text]) air absorbed dose rates due to natural radioactivity were 49.26 and 27.4 and the total effective dose ([Formula: see text]; µSvy(−1)) ranged from 150.2 to 498.9 (average: 275.2). The measured radioactivity resulted in an excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) in the range of 58–203 (average: 111) in and an average gonadal dose (AGD; µGy.y(−1)) ranged from 97.3 to 329.5 (average: 181.1). Total dose rate per marine organism ranged from 0.035 µGy h(−1) (in zooplankton) to 0.564 µGy h(−1) (in phytoplankton). The results showed marine sediments as an important source of radiation exposure to biota in the aquatic environment. Regular monitoring of radioactivity levels is vital for radiation risk confinement. The results provide an important radiological risk profile parameter to which future radioactivity levels in marine environments can be compared.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8230884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82308842021-06-26 Radiological Risk to Human and Non-Human Biota Due to Radioactivity in Coastal Sand and Marine Sediments, Gulf of Oman Suliman, Ibrahim I. Alsafi, Khalid Life (Basel) Article Natural and (137)Cs radioactivity in coastal marine sediment samples was measured using gamma spectrometry. Samples were collected at 16 locations from four beaches along the coastal area of Muscat City, Gulf of Oman. Radioactivity in beach sand was used to estimate the radiological risk parameters to humans, whereas the radioactivity in marine sediments was used to assess the radiological risk parameters to non-human biota, using the ERICA Tool. The average radioactivity concentrations (Bqkg(−1)) of (226)Ra, (232)Th, (40)K, (210)Pb and (137)Cs in sediments (sand) were as follows: 16.2 (16.3), 34.5(27.8), 54.7 (45.6), 46.8 (44.9) and 0.08 (0.10), respectively. In sand samples, the estimated average indoor ([Formula: see text]) and outdoor ([Formula: see text]) air absorbed dose rates due to natural radioactivity were 49.26 and 27.4 and the total effective dose ([Formula: see text]; µSvy(−1)) ranged from 150.2 to 498.9 (average: 275.2). The measured radioactivity resulted in an excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) in the range of 58–203 (average: 111) in and an average gonadal dose (AGD; µGy.y(−1)) ranged from 97.3 to 329.5 (average: 181.1). Total dose rate per marine organism ranged from 0.035 µGy h(−1) (in zooplankton) to 0.564 µGy h(−1) (in phytoplankton). The results showed marine sediments as an important source of radiation exposure to biota in the aquatic environment. Regular monitoring of radioactivity levels is vital for radiation risk confinement. The results provide an important radiological risk profile parameter to which future radioactivity levels in marine environments can be compared. MDPI 2021-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8230884/ /pubmed/34208166 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11060549 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Suliman, Ibrahim I.
Alsafi, Khalid
Radiological Risk to Human and Non-Human Biota Due to Radioactivity in Coastal Sand and Marine Sediments, Gulf of Oman
title Radiological Risk to Human and Non-Human Biota Due to Radioactivity in Coastal Sand and Marine Sediments, Gulf of Oman
title_full Radiological Risk to Human and Non-Human Biota Due to Radioactivity in Coastal Sand and Marine Sediments, Gulf of Oman
title_fullStr Radiological Risk to Human and Non-Human Biota Due to Radioactivity in Coastal Sand and Marine Sediments, Gulf of Oman
title_full_unstemmed Radiological Risk to Human and Non-Human Biota Due to Radioactivity in Coastal Sand and Marine Sediments, Gulf of Oman
title_short Radiological Risk to Human and Non-Human Biota Due to Radioactivity in Coastal Sand and Marine Sediments, Gulf of Oman
title_sort radiological risk to human and non-human biota due to radioactivity in coastal sand and marine sediments, gulf of oman
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8230884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34208166
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11060549
work_keys_str_mv AT sulimanibrahimi radiologicalrisktohumanandnonhumanbiotaduetoradioactivityincoastalsandandmarinesedimentsgulfofoman
AT alsafikhalid radiologicalrisktohumanandnonhumanbiotaduetoradioactivityincoastalsandandmarinesedimentsgulfofoman