Cargando…

Protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing two CPAP levels to prevent extubation failure in extremely preterm infants

INTRODUCTION: Respiratory distress syndrome is a complication of prematurity and extremely preterm infants born before 28 weeks’ gestation often require endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. In this high-risk population, mechanical ventilation is associated with lung injury and contrib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kidman, Anna Madeline, Manley, Brett James, Boland, Rosemarie Anne, Malhotra, Atul, Donath, Susan M, Davis, Peter G, Bhatia, Risha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8230987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34162644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045897
_version_ 1783713332075692032
author Kidman, Anna Madeline
Manley, Brett James
Boland, Rosemarie Anne
Malhotra, Atul
Donath, Susan M
Davis, Peter G
Bhatia, Risha
author_facet Kidman, Anna Madeline
Manley, Brett James
Boland, Rosemarie Anne
Malhotra, Atul
Donath, Susan M
Davis, Peter G
Bhatia, Risha
author_sort Kidman, Anna Madeline
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Respiratory distress syndrome is a complication of prematurity and extremely preterm infants born before 28 weeks’ gestation often require endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. In this high-risk population, mechanical ventilation is associated with lung injury and contributes to bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Therefore, clinicians attempt to extubate infants as quickly and use non-invasive respiratory support such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to facilitate the transition. However, approximately 60% of extremely preterm infants experience ‘extubation failure’ and require reintubation. While CPAP pressures of 5–8 cm H2O are commonly used, the optimal CPAP pressure is unknown, and higher pressures may be beneficial in avoiding extubation failure. Our trial is the Extubation CPAP Level Assessment Trial (ÉCLAT). The aim of this trial is to compare higher CPAP pressures 9–11 cm H2O with a current standard pressures of 6–8 cmH2O on extubation failure in extremely preterm infants. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 200 extremely preterm infants will be recruited prior to their first extubation from mechanical ventilation to CPAP. This is a parallel group randomised controlled trial. Infants will be randomised to one of two set CPAP pressures: CPAP 10 cmH2O (intervention) or CPAP 7 cmH2O (control). The primary outcome will be extubation failure (reintubation) within 7 days. Statistical analysis will follow standard methods for randomised trials on an intention to treat basis. For the primary outcome, this will be by intention to treat, adjusted for the prerandomisation strata (GA and centre). We will use the appropriate parametric and non-parametric statistical tests. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been granted by the Monash Health Human Research Ethics Committees. Amendments to the trial protocol will be submitted for approval. The findings of this study will be written into a clinical trial report manuscript and disseminated via peer-reviewed journals (on-line or in press) and presented at national and international conferences. Trial registration number ACTRN12618001638224; pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8230987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82309872021-07-09 Protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing two CPAP levels to prevent extubation failure in extremely preterm infants Kidman, Anna Madeline Manley, Brett James Boland, Rosemarie Anne Malhotra, Atul Donath, Susan M Davis, Peter G Bhatia, Risha BMJ Open Paediatrics INTRODUCTION: Respiratory distress syndrome is a complication of prematurity and extremely preterm infants born before 28 weeks’ gestation often require endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. In this high-risk population, mechanical ventilation is associated with lung injury and contributes to bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Therefore, clinicians attempt to extubate infants as quickly and use non-invasive respiratory support such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to facilitate the transition. However, approximately 60% of extremely preterm infants experience ‘extubation failure’ and require reintubation. While CPAP pressures of 5–8 cm H2O are commonly used, the optimal CPAP pressure is unknown, and higher pressures may be beneficial in avoiding extubation failure. Our trial is the Extubation CPAP Level Assessment Trial (ÉCLAT). The aim of this trial is to compare higher CPAP pressures 9–11 cm H2O with a current standard pressures of 6–8 cmH2O on extubation failure in extremely preterm infants. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 200 extremely preterm infants will be recruited prior to their first extubation from mechanical ventilation to CPAP. This is a parallel group randomised controlled trial. Infants will be randomised to one of two set CPAP pressures: CPAP 10 cmH2O (intervention) or CPAP 7 cmH2O (control). The primary outcome will be extubation failure (reintubation) within 7 days. Statistical analysis will follow standard methods for randomised trials on an intention to treat basis. For the primary outcome, this will be by intention to treat, adjusted for the prerandomisation strata (GA and centre). We will use the appropriate parametric and non-parametric statistical tests. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been granted by the Monash Health Human Research Ethics Committees. Amendments to the trial protocol will be submitted for approval. The findings of this study will be written into a clinical trial report manuscript and disseminated via peer-reviewed journals (on-line or in press) and presented at national and international conferences. Trial registration number ACTRN12618001638224; pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8230987/ /pubmed/34162644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045897 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Paediatrics
Kidman, Anna Madeline
Manley, Brett James
Boland, Rosemarie Anne
Malhotra, Atul
Donath, Susan M
Davis, Peter G
Bhatia, Risha
Protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing two CPAP levels to prevent extubation failure in extremely preterm infants
title Protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing two CPAP levels to prevent extubation failure in extremely preterm infants
title_full Protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing two CPAP levels to prevent extubation failure in extremely preterm infants
title_fullStr Protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing two CPAP levels to prevent extubation failure in extremely preterm infants
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing two CPAP levels to prevent extubation failure in extremely preterm infants
title_short Protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing two CPAP levels to prevent extubation failure in extremely preterm infants
title_sort protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing two cpap levels to prevent extubation failure in extremely preterm infants
topic Paediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8230987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34162644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045897
work_keys_str_mv AT kidmanannamadeline protocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtwocpaplevelstopreventextubationfailureinextremelypreterminfants
AT manleybrettjames protocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtwocpaplevelstopreventextubationfailureinextremelypreterminfants
AT bolandrosemarieanne protocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtwocpaplevelstopreventextubationfailureinextremelypreterminfants
AT malhotraatul protocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtwocpaplevelstopreventextubationfailureinextremelypreterminfants
AT donathsusanm protocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtwocpaplevelstopreventextubationfailureinextremelypreterminfants
AT davispeterg protocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtwocpaplevelstopreventextubationfailureinextremelypreterminfants
AT bhatiarisha protocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtwocpaplevelstopreventextubationfailureinextremelypreterminfants