Cargando…

Characteristics of oxygen concentration and the role of correction factor in real-time GI breath test

OBJECTIVE: A high quality end-expiratory breath sample is required for a reliable gastrointestinal breath test result. Oxygen (O(2)) concentration in the breath sample can be used as a quality marker. This study investigated the characteristics of O(2) concentration in the breath sample and the impa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Siu Man, Falconer, Imogen H E, Madden, Trudi, Laidler, Peter O
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34168044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000640
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: A high quality end-expiratory breath sample is required for a reliable gastrointestinal breath test result. Oxygen (O(2)) concentration in the breath sample can be used as a quality marker. This study investigated the characteristics of O(2) concentration in the breath sample and the impact of using a correction factor in real-time breath measurement. DESIGN: This study includes two separate groups of patient data. Part 1 of the study analysed the patient’s ability to deliver end-expiratory breath samples over a 2-year period (n=564). Part 2 of the study analysed a separate group of patients (n=47) with additional data to investigate the O(2) characteristics and the role of correction factor in breath test. RESULTS: The results indicated 95.4% of 564 patients were able to achieve an O(2) concentration below 14% in their end-expiratory breath. Part 2 of the study revealed that the distribution of O(2) concentration was between 9.5% and 16.2%. Applying a correction factor to predict the end-expiratory H(2) and CH(4) values led to an average measurement error of −36.4% and −12.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients are able to deliver a high quality end-expiratory breath sample, regardless of age or gender. The correction factor algorithm is unreliable when predicting the end-expiratory result at 15% O(2) and it would have resulted in false negative result for 50% of the positive cases in this study. It has also indicated that the continuous O(2) measurement is essential to ensure breath sample quality by preventing secondary breathing during real-time breath collection.