Cargando…
In vitro fertilisation (IVF) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients without severe male factor infertility: study protocol for the randomised, controlled, multicentre trial INVICSI
INTRODUCTION: Over the last decades, the use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has increased, even among patients without male factor infertility. The increase has happened even though there is no evidence to support that ICSI results in higher live birth rates compared with conventional in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34168037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051058 |
_version_ | 1783713343195840512 |
---|---|
author | Berntsen, Sine Nøhr, Bugge Grøndahl, Marie Louise Petersen, Morten Rønn Andersen, Lars Franch Englund, Anne Lis Knudsen, Ulla Breth Prætorius, Lisbeth Zedeler, Anne Nielsen, Henriette Svarre Pinborg, Anja Freiesleben, Nina La Cour |
author_facet | Berntsen, Sine Nøhr, Bugge Grøndahl, Marie Louise Petersen, Morten Rønn Andersen, Lars Franch Englund, Anne Lis Knudsen, Ulla Breth Prætorius, Lisbeth Zedeler, Anne Nielsen, Henriette Svarre Pinborg, Anja Freiesleben, Nina La Cour |
author_sort | Berntsen, Sine |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Over the last decades, the use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has increased, even among patients without male factor infertility. The increase has happened even though there is no evidence to support that ICSI results in higher live birth rates compared with conventional in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in cases with nonmale factor infertility. The lack of robust evidence on an advantage of using ICSI over conventional IVF in these patients is problematic since ICSI is more invasive, complex and requires additional resources, time and effort. Therefore, the primary objective of the IVF versus ICSI (INVICSI) study is to determine whether ICSI is superior to standard IVF in patients without severe male factor infertility. The primary outcome measure is first live birth from fresh and frozen-thawed transfers after one stimulated cycle. Secondary outcomes include fertilisation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, birth weight and congenital anomalies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a two-armed, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. In total, 824 couples/women with infertility without severe male factor will be recruited and allocated randomly into two groups (IVF or ICSI) in a 1:1 ratio. Participants will be randomised in variable block sizes and stratified by trial site and age. The main inclusion criteria are (1) no prior IVF/ICSI treatment, (2) male partner sperm with an expected count of minimum 2 million progressive motile spermatozoa following density gradient purification on the day of oocyte pick up and (3) age of the woman between 18 and 42 years. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be performed in accordance with the ethical principles in the Helsinki Declaration. The study is approved by the Scientific Ethical Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark. Study findings will be presented, irrespectively of results at international conferences and submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04128904. Pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8231059 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82310592021-07-09 In vitro fertilisation (IVF) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients without severe male factor infertility: study protocol for the randomised, controlled, multicentre trial INVICSI Berntsen, Sine Nøhr, Bugge Grøndahl, Marie Louise Petersen, Morten Rønn Andersen, Lars Franch Englund, Anne Lis Knudsen, Ulla Breth Prætorius, Lisbeth Zedeler, Anne Nielsen, Henriette Svarre Pinborg, Anja Freiesleben, Nina La Cour BMJ Open Reproductive Medicine INTRODUCTION: Over the last decades, the use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has increased, even among patients without male factor infertility. The increase has happened even though there is no evidence to support that ICSI results in higher live birth rates compared with conventional in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in cases with nonmale factor infertility. The lack of robust evidence on an advantage of using ICSI over conventional IVF in these patients is problematic since ICSI is more invasive, complex and requires additional resources, time and effort. Therefore, the primary objective of the IVF versus ICSI (INVICSI) study is to determine whether ICSI is superior to standard IVF in patients without severe male factor infertility. The primary outcome measure is first live birth from fresh and frozen-thawed transfers after one stimulated cycle. Secondary outcomes include fertilisation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, birth weight and congenital anomalies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a two-armed, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. In total, 824 couples/women with infertility without severe male factor will be recruited and allocated randomly into two groups (IVF or ICSI) in a 1:1 ratio. Participants will be randomised in variable block sizes and stratified by trial site and age. The main inclusion criteria are (1) no prior IVF/ICSI treatment, (2) male partner sperm with an expected count of minimum 2 million progressive motile spermatozoa following density gradient purification on the day of oocyte pick up and (3) age of the woman between 18 and 42 years. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be performed in accordance with the ethical principles in the Helsinki Declaration. The study is approved by the Scientific Ethical Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark. Study findings will be presented, irrespectively of results at international conferences and submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04128904. Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8231059/ /pubmed/34168037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051058 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Reproductive Medicine Berntsen, Sine Nøhr, Bugge Grøndahl, Marie Louise Petersen, Morten Rønn Andersen, Lars Franch Englund, Anne Lis Knudsen, Ulla Breth Prætorius, Lisbeth Zedeler, Anne Nielsen, Henriette Svarre Pinborg, Anja Freiesleben, Nina La Cour In vitro fertilisation (IVF) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients without severe male factor infertility: study protocol for the randomised, controlled, multicentre trial INVICSI |
title | In vitro fertilisation (IVF) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients without severe male factor infertility: study protocol for the randomised, controlled, multicentre trial INVICSI |
title_full | In vitro fertilisation (IVF) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients without severe male factor infertility: study protocol for the randomised, controlled, multicentre trial INVICSI |
title_fullStr | In vitro fertilisation (IVF) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients without severe male factor infertility: study protocol for the randomised, controlled, multicentre trial INVICSI |
title_full_unstemmed | In vitro fertilisation (IVF) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients without severe male factor infertility: study protocol for the randomised, controlled, multicentre trial INVICSI |
title_short | In vitro fertilisation (IVF) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients without severe male factor infertility: study protocol for the randomised, controlled, multicentre trial INVICSI |
title_sort | in vitro fertilisation (ivf) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (icsi) in patients without severe male factor infertility: study protocol for the randomised, controlled, multicentre trial invicsi |
topic | Reproductive Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34168037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051058 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT berntsensine invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi AT nøhrbugge invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi AT grøndahlmarielouise invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi AT petersenmortenrønn invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi AT andersenlarsfranch invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi AT englundannelis invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi AT knudsenullabreth invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi AT prætoriuslisbeth invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi AT zedeleranne invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi AT nielsenhenriettesvarre invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi AT pinborganja invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi AT freieslebenninalacour invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi |