Cargando…

In vitro fertilisation (IVF) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients without severe male factor infertility: study protocol for the randomised, controlled, multicentre trial INVICSI

INTRODUCTION: Over the last decades, the use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has increased, even among patients without male factor infertility. The increase has happened even though there is no evidence to support that ICSI results in higher live birth rates compared with conventional in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berntsen, Sine, Nøhr, Bugge, Grøndahl, Marie Louise, Petersen, Morten Rønn, Andersen, Lars Franch, Englund, Anne Lis, Knudsen, Ulla Breth, Prætorius, Lisbeth, Zedeler, Anne, Nielsen, Henriette Svarre, Pinborg, Anja, Freiesleben, Nina La Cour
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34168037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051058
_version_ 1783713343195840512
author Berntsen, Sine
Nøhr, Bugge
Grøndahl, Marie Louise
Petersen, Morten Rønn
Andersen, Lars Franch
Englund, Anne Lis
Knudsen, Ulla Breth
Prætorius, Lisbeth
Zedeler, Anne
Nielsen, Henriette Svarre
Pinborg, Anja
Freiesleben, Nina La Cour
author_facet Berntsen, Sine
Nøhr, Bugge
Grøndahl, Marie Louise
Petersen, Morten Rønn
Andersen, Lars Franch
Englund, Anne Lis
Knudsen, Ulla Breth
Prætorius, Lisbeth
Zedeler, Anne
Nielsen, Henriette Svarre
Pinborg, Anja
Freiesleben, Nina La Cour
author_sort Berntsen, Sine
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Over the last decades, the use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has increased, even among patients without male factor infertility. The increase has happened even though there is no evidence to support that ICSI results in higher live birth rates compared with conventional in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in cases with nonmale factor infertility. The lack of robust evidence on an advantage of using ICSI over conventional IVF in these patients is problematic since ICSI is more invasive, complex and requires additional resources, time and effort. Therefore, the primary objective of the IVF versus ICSI (INVICSI) study is to determine whether ICSI is superior to standard IVF in patients without severe male factor infertility. The primary outcome measure is first live birth from fresh and frozen-thawed transfers after one stimulated cycle. Secondary outcomes include fertilisation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, birth weight and congenital anomalies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a two-armed, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. In total, 824 couples/women with infertility without severe male factor will be recruited and allocated randomly into two groups (IVF or ICSI) in a 1:1 ratio. Participants will be randomised in variable block sizes and stratified by trial site and age. The main inclusion criteria are (1) no prior IVF/ICSI treatment, (2) male partner sperm with an expected count of minimum 2 million progressive motile spermatozoa following density gradient purification on the day of oocyte pick up and (3) age of the woman between 18 and 42 years. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be performed in accordance with the ethical principles in the Helsinki Declaration. The study is approved by the Scientific Ethical Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark. Study findings will be presented, irrespectively of results at international conferences and submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04128904. Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8231059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82310592021-07-09 In vitro fertilisation (IVF) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients without severe male factor infertility: study protocol for the randomised, controlled, multicentre trial INVICSI Berntsen, Sine Nøhr, Bugge Grøndahl, Marie Louise Petersen, Morten Rønn Andersen, Lars Franch Englund, Anne Lis Knudsen, Ulla Breth Prætorius, Lisbeth Zedeler, Anne Nielsen, Henriette Svarre Pinborg, Anja Freiesleben, Nina La Cour BMJ Open Reproductive Medicine INTRODUCTION: Over the last decades, the use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has increased, even among patients without male factor infertility. The increase has happened even though there is no evidence to support that ICSI results in higher live birth rates compared with conventional in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in cases with nonmale factor infertility. The lack of robust evidence on an advantage of using ICSI over conventional IVF in these patients is problematic since ICSI is more invasive, complex and requires additional resources, time and effort. Therefore, the primary objective of the IVF versus ICSI (INVICSI) study is to determine whether ICSI is superior to standard IVF in patients without severe male factor infertility. The primary outcome measure is first live birth from fresh and frozen-thawed transfers after one stimulated cycle. Secondary outcomes include fertilisation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, birth weight and congenital anomalies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a two-armed, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. In total, 824 couples/women with infertility without severe male factor will be recruited and allocated randomly into two groups (IVF or ICSI) in a 1:1 ratio. Participants will be randomised in variable block sizes and stratified by trial site and age. The main inclusion criteria are (1) no prior IVF/ICSI treatment, (2) male partner sperm with an expected count of minimum 2 million progressive motile spermatozoa following density gradient purification on the day of oocyte pick up and (3) age of the woman between 18 and 42 years. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be performed in accordance with the ethical principles in the Helsinki Declaration. The study is approved by the Scientific Ethical Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark. Study findings will be presented, irrespectively of results at international conferences and submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04128904. Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8231059/ /pubmed/34168037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051058 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Reproductive Medicine
Berntsen, Sine
Nøhr, Bugge
Grøndahl, Marie Louise
Petersen, Morten Rønn
Andersen, Lars Franch
Englund, Anne Lis
Knudsen, Ulla Breth
Prætorius, Lisbeth
Zedeler, Anne
Nielsen, Henriette Svarre
Pinborg, Anja
Freiesleben, Nina La Cour
In vitro fertilisation (IVF) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients without severe male factor infertility: study protocol for the randomised, controlled, multicentre trial INVICSI
title In vitro fertilisation (IVF) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients without severe male factor infertility: study protocol for the randomised, controlled, multicentre trial INVICSI
title_full In vitro fertilisation (IVF) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients without severe male factor infertility: study protocol for the randomised, controlled, multicentre trial INVICSI
title_fullStr In vitro fertilisation (IVF) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients without severe male factor infertility: study protocol for the randomised, controlled, multicentre trial INVICSI
title_full_unstemmed In vitro fertilisation (IVF) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients without severe male factor infertility: study protocol for the randomised, controlled, multicentre trial INVICSI
title_short In vitro fertilisation (IVF) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients without severe male factor infertility: study protocol for the randomised, controlled, multicentre trial INVICSI
title_sort in vitro fertilisation (ivf) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (icsi) in patients without severe male factor infertility: study protocol for the randomised, controlled, multicentre trial invicsi
topic Reproductive Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34168037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051058
work_keys_str_mv AT berntsensine invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi
AT nøhrbugge invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi
AT grøndahlmarielouise invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi
AT petersenmortenrønn invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi
AT andersenlarsfranch invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi
AT englundannelis invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi
AT knudsenullabreth invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi
AT prætoriuslisbeth invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi
AT zedeleranne invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi
AT nielsenhenriettesvarre invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi
AT pinborganja invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi
AT freieslebenninalacour invitrofertilisationivfversusintracytoplasmicsperminjectionicsiinpatientswithoutseveremalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolfortherandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialinvicsi