Cargando…

Intracerebral administration of CTLA-4 and PD-1 immune checkpoint blocking monoclonal antibodies in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a phase I clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGB) have a poor prognosis with a median overall survival (OS) of 30–39 weeks in prospective clinical trials. Intravenous administration of programmed cell death protein 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitors has low activity in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duerinck, Johnny, Schwarze, Julia Katharina, Awada, Gil, Tijtgat, Jens, Vaeyens, Freya, Bertels, Cleo, Geens, Wietse, Klein, Samuel, Seynaeve, Laura, Cras, Louise, D’Haene, Nicky, Michotte, Alex, Caljon, Ben, Salmon, Isabelle, Bruneau, Michaël, Kockx, Mark, Van Dooren, Sonia, Vanbinst, Anne-Marie, Everaert, Hendrik, Forsyth, Ramses, Neyns, Bart
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34168003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-002296
_version_ 1783713343679234048
author Duerinck, Johnny
Schwarze, Julia Katharina
Awada, Gil
Tijtgat, Jens
Vaeyens, Freya
Bertels, Cleo
Geens, Wietse
Klein, Samuel
Seynaeve, Laura
Cras, Louise
D’Haene, Nicky
Michotte, Alex
Caljon, Ben
Salmon, Isabelle
Bruneau, Michaël
Kockx, Mark
Van Dooren, Sonia
Vanbinst, Anne-Marie
Everaert, Hendrik
Forsyth, Ramses
Neyns, Bart
author_facet Duerinck, Johnny
Schwarze, Julia Katharina
Awada, Gil
Tijtgat, Jens
Vaeyens, Freya
Bertels, Cleo
Geens, Wietse
Klein, Samuel
Seynaeve, Laura
Cras, Louise
D’Haene, Nicky
Michotte, Alex
Caljon, Ben
Salmon, Isabelle
Bruneau, Michaël
Kockx, Mark
Van Dooren, Sonia
Vanbinst, Anne-Marie
Everaert, Hendrik
Forsyth, Ramses
Neyns, Bart
author_sort Duerinck, Johnny
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGB) have a poor prognosis with a median overall survival (OS) of 30–39 weeks in prospective clinical trials. Intravenous administration of programmed cell death protein 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitors has low activity in patients with rGB. In this phase I clinical trial, intracerebral (IC) administration of ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO) in combination with intravenous administration of NIVO was investigated. METHODS: Within 24 hours following the intravenous administration of a fixed dose (10 mg) of NIVO, patients underwent a maximal safe resection, followed by injection of IPI (10 mg; cohort-1), or IPI (5 mg) plus NIVO (10 mg; cohort-2) in the brain tissue lining the resection cavity. Intravenous administration of NIVO (10 mg) was repeated every 2 weeks (max. five administrations). Next generation sequencing and RNA gene expression profiling was performed on resected tumor tissue. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled (cohort-1: n=3; cohort-2: n=24). All patients underwent maximal safe resection and planned IC administrations and preoperative NIVO. Thirteen patients (cohort-1: n=3; cohort-2: n=10) received all five postoperative intravenous doses of NIVO. In cohort-2, 14 patients received a median of 3 (range 1–4) intravenous doses. Subacute postoperative neurological deterioration (n=2) was reversible on steroid treatment; no other central nervous system toxicity was observed. Immune-related adverse events were infrequent and mild. GB recurrence was diagnosed in 26 patients (median progression-free survival (PFS) is 11.7 weeks (range 2–152)); 21 patients have died due to progression. Median OS is 38 weeks (95% CI: 27 to 49) with a 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year OS-rate of, respectively, 74.1% (95% CI: 57 to 90), 40.7% (95% CI: 22 to 59), and 27% (95% CI: 9 to 44). OS compares favorable against a historical cohort (descriptive Log-Rank p>0.003). No significant difference was found with respect to PFS (descriptive Log-Rank test p>0.05). A higher tumor mRNA expression level of B7-H3 was associated with a significantly worse survival (multivariate Cox logistic regression, p>0.029). CONCLUSION: IC administration of NIVO and IPI following maximal safe resection of rGB was feasible, safe, and associated with encouraging OS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03233152.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8231061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82310612021-07-09 Intracerebral administration of CTLA-4 and PD-1 immune checkpoint blocking monoclonal antibodies in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a phase I clinical trial Duerinck, Johnny Schwarze, Julia Katharina Awada, Gil Tijtgat, Jens Vaeyens, Freya Bertels, Cleo Geens, Wietse Klein, Samuel Seynaeve, Laura Cras, Louise D’Haene, Nicky Michotte, Alex Caljon, Ben Salmon, Isabelle Bruneau, Michaël Kockx, Mark Van Dooren, Sonia Vanbinst, Anne-Marie Everaert, Hendrik Forsyth, Ramses Neyns, Bart J Immunother Cancer Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGB) have a poor prognosis with a median overall survival (OS) of 30–39 weeks in prospective clinical trials. Intravenous administration of programmed cell death protein 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitors has low activity in patients with rGB. In this phase I clinical trial, intracerebral (IC) administration of ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO) in combination with intravenous administration of NIVO was investigated. METHODS: Within 24 hours following the intravenous administration of a fixed dose (10 mg) of NIVO, patients underwent a maximal safe resection, followed by injection of IPI (10 mg; cohort-1), or IPI (5 mg) plus NIVO (10 mg; cohort-2) in the brain tissue lining the resection cavity. Intravenous administration of NIVO (10 mg) was repeated every 2 weeks (max. five administrations). Next generation sequencing and RNA gene expression profiling was performed on resected tumor tissue. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled (cohort-1: n=3; cohort-2: n=24). All patients underwent maximal safe resection and planned IC administrations and preoperative NIVO. Thirteen patients (cohort-1: n=3; cohort-2: n=10) received all five postoperative intravenous doses of NIVO. In cohort-2, 14 patients received a median of 3 (range 1–4) intravenous doses. Subacute postoperative neurological deterioration (n=2) was reversible on steroid treatment; no other central nervous system toxicity was observed. Immune-related adverse events were infrequent and mild. GB recurrence was diagnosed in 26 patients (median progression-free survival (PFS) is 11.7 weeks (range 2–152)); 21 patients have died due to progression. Median OS is 38 weeks (95% CI: 27 to 49) with a 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year OS-rate of, respectively, 74.1% (95% CI: 57 to 90), 40.7% (95% CI: 22 to 59), and 27% (95% CI: 9 to 44). OS compares favorable against a historical cohort (descriptive Log-Rank p>0.003). No significant difference was found with respect to PFS (descriptive Log-Rank test p>0.05). A higher tumor mRNA expression level of B7-H3 was associated with a significantly worse survival (multivariate Cox logistic regression, p>0.029). CONCLUSION: IC administration of NIVO and IPI following maximal safe resection of rGB was feasible, safe, and associated with encouraging OS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03233152. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8231061/ /pubmed/34168003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-002296 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy
Duerinck, Johnny
Schwarze, Julia Katharina
Awada, Gil
Tijtgat, Jens
Vaeyens, Freya
Bertels, Cleo
Geens, Wietse
Klein, Samuel
Seynaeve, Laura
Cras, Louise
D’Haene, Nicky
Michotte, Alex
Caljon, Ben
Salmon, Isabelle
Bruneau, Michaël
Kockx, Mark
Van Dooren, Sonia
Vanbinst, Anne-Marie
Everaert, Hendrik
Forsyth, Ramses
Neyns, Bart
Intracerebral administration of CTLA-4 and PD-1 immune checkpoint blocking monoclonal antibodies in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a phase I clinical trial
title Intracerebral administration of CTLA-4 and PD-1 immune checkpoint blocking monoclonal antibodies in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a phase I clinical trial
title_full Intracerebral administration of CTLA-4 and PD-1 immune checkpoint blocking monoclonal antibodies in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a phase I clinical trial
title_fullStr Intracerebral administration of CTLA-4 and PD-1 immune checkpoint blocking monoclonal antibodies in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a phase I clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Intracerebral administration of CTLA-4 and PD-1 immune checkpoint blocking monoclonal antibodies in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a phase I clinical trial
title_short Intracerebral administration of CTLA-4 and PD-1 immune checkpoint blocking monoclonal antibodies in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a phase I clinical trial
title_sort intracerebral administration of ctla-4 and pd-1 immune checkpoint blocking monoclonal antibodies in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a phase i clinical trial
topic Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34168003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-002296
work_keys_str_mv AT duerinckjohnny intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial
AT schwarzejuliakatharina intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial
AT awadagil intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial
AT tijtgatjens intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial
AT vaeyensfreya intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial
AT bertelscleo intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial
AT geenswietse intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial
AT kleinsamuel intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial
AT seynaevelaura intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial
AT craslouise intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial
AT dhaenenicky intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial
AT michottealex intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial
AT caljonben intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial
AT salmonisabelle intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial
AT bruneaumichael intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial
AT kockxmark intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial
AT vandoorensonia intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial
AT vanbinstannemarie intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial
AT everaerthendrik intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial
AT forsythramses intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial
AT neynsbart intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial