Cargando…
Intracerebral administration of CTLA-4 and PD-1 immune checkpoint blocking monoclonal antibodies in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a phase I clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGB) have a poor prognosis with a median overall survival (OS) of 30–39 weeks in prospective clinical trials. Intravenous administration of programmed cell death protein 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitors has low activity in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34168003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-002296 |
_version_ | 1783713343679234048 |
---|---|
author | Duerinck, Johnny Schwarze, Julia Katharina Awada, Gil Tijtgat, Jens Vaeyens, Freya Bertels, Cleo Geens, Wietse Klein, Samuel Seynaeve, Laura Cras, Louise D’Haene, Nicky Michotte, Alex Caljon, Ben Salmon, Isabelle Bruneau, Michaël Kockx, Mark Van Dooren, Sonia Vanbinst, Anne-Marie Everaert, Hendrik Forsyth, Ramses Neyns, Bart |
author_facet | Duerinck, Johnny Schwarze, Julia Katharina Awada, Gil Tijtgat, Jens Vaeyens, Freya Bertels, Cleo Geens, Wietse Klein, Samuel Seynaeve, Laura Cras, Louise D’Haene, Nicky Michotte, Alex Caljon, Ben Salmon, Isabelle Bruneau, Michaël Kockx, Mark Van Dooren, Sonia Vanbinst, Anne-Marie Everaert, Hendrik Forsyth, Ramses Neyns, Bart |
author_sort | Duerinck, Johnny |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGB) have a poor prognosis with a median overall survival (OS) of 30–39 weeks in prospective clinical trials. Intravenous administration of programmed cell death protein 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitors has low activity in patients with rGB. In this phase I clinical trial, intracerebral (IC) administration of ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO) in combination with intravenous administration of NIVO was investigated. METHODS: Within 24 hours following the intravenous administration of a fixed dose (10 mg) of NIVO, patients underwent a maximal safe resection, followed by injection of IPI (10 mg; cohort-1), or IPI (5 mg) plus NIVO (10 mg; cohort-2) in the brain tissue lining the resection cavity. Intravenous administration of NIVO (10 mg) was repeated every 2 weeks (max. five administrations). Next generation sequencing and RNA gene expression profiling was performed on resected tumor tissue. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled (cohort-1: n=3; cohort-2: n=24). All patients underwent maximal safe resection and planned IC administrations and preoperative NIVO. Thirteen patients (cohort-1: n=3; cohort-2: n=10) received all five postoperative intravenous doses of NIVO. In cohort-2, 14 patients received a median of 3 (range 1–4) intravenous doses. Subacute postoperative neurological deterioration (n=2) was reversible on steroid treatment; no other central nervous system toxicity was observed. Immune-related adverse events were infrequent and mild. GB recurrence was diagnosed in 26 patients (median progression-free survival (PFS) is 11.7 weeks (range 2–152)); 21 patients have died due to progression. Median OS is 38 weeks (95% CI: 27 to 49) with a 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year OS-rate of, respectively, 74.1% (95% CI: 57 to 90), 40.7% (95% CI: 22 to 59), and 27% (95% CI: 9 to 44). OS compares favorable against a historical cohort (descriptive Log-Rank p>0.003). No significant difference was found with respect to PFS (descriptive Log-Rank test p>0.05). A higher tumor mRNA expression level of B7-H3 was associated with a significantly worse survival (multivariate Cox logistic regression, p>0.029). CONCLUSION: IC administration of NIVO and IPI following maximal safe resection of rGB was feasible, safe, and associated with encouraging OS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03233152. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8231061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82310612021-07-09 Intracerebral administration of CTLA-4 and PD-1 immune checkpoint blocking monoclonal antibodies in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a phase I clinical trial Duerinck, Johnny Schwarze, Julia Katharina Awada, Gil Tijtgat, Jens Vaeyens, Freya Bertels, Cleo Geens, Wietse Klein, Samuel Seynaeve, Laura Cras, Louise D’Haene, Nicky Michotte, Alex Caljon, Ben Salmon, Isabelle Bruneau, Michaël Kockx, Mark Van Dooren, Sonia Vanbinst, Anne-Marie Everaert, Hendrik Forsyth, Ramses Neyns, Bart J Immunother Cancer Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGB) have a poor prognosis with a median overall survival (OS) of 30–39 weeks in prospective clinical trials. Intravenous administration of programmed cell death protein 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitors has low activity in patients with rGB. In this phase I clinical trial, intracerebral (IC) administration of ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO) in combination with intravenous administration of NIVO was investigated. METHODS: Within 24 hours following the intravenous administration of a fixed dose (10 mg) of NIVO, patients underwent a maximal safe resection, followed by injection of IPI (10 mg; cohort-1), or IPI (5 mg) plus NIVO (10 mg; cohort-2) in the brain tissue lining the resection cavity. Intravenous administration of NIVO (10 mg) was repeated every 2 weeks (max. five administrations). Next generation sequencing and RNA gene expression profiling was performed on resected tumor tissue. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled (cohort-1: n=3; cohort-2: n=24). All patients underwent maximal safe resection and planned IC administrations and preoperative NIVO. Thirteen patients (cohort-1: n=3; cohort-2: n=10) received all five postoperative intravenous doses of NIVO. In cohort-2, 14 patients received a median of 3 (range 1–4) intravenous doses. Subacute postoperative neurological deterioration (n=2) was reversible on steroid treatment; no other central nervous system toxicity was observed. Immune-related adverse events were infrequent and mild. GB recurrence was diagnosed in 26 patients (median progression-free survival (PFS) is 11.7 weeks (range 2–152)); 21 patients have died due to progression. Median OS is 38 weeks (95% CI: 27 to 49) with a 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year OS-rate of, respectively, 74.1% (95% CI: 57 to 90), 40.7% (95% CI: 22 to 59), and 27% (95% CI: 9 to 44). OS compares favorable against a historical cohort (descriptive Log-Rank p>0.003). No significant difference was found with respect to PFS (descriptive Log-Rank test p>0.05). A higher tumor mRNA expression level of B7-H3 was associated with a significantly worse survival (multivariate Cox logistic regression, p>0.029). CONCLUSION: IC administration of NIVO and IPI following maximal safe resection of rGB was feasible, safe, and associated with encouraging OS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03233152. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8231061/ /pubmed/34168003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-002296 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy Duerinck, Johnny Schwarze, Julia Katharina Awada, Gil Tijtgat, Jens Vaeyens, Freya Bertels, Cleo Geens, Wietse Klein, Samuel Seynaeve, Laura Cras, Louise D’Haene, Nicky Michotte, Alex Caljon, Ben Salmon, Isabelle Bruneau, Michaël Kockx, Mark Van Dooren, Sonia Vanbinst, Anne-Marie Everaert, Hendrik Forsyth, Ramses Neyns, Bart Intracerebral administration of CTLA-4 and PD-1 immune checkpoint blocking monoclonal antibodies in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a phase I clinical trial |
title | Intracerebral administration of CTLA-4 and PD-1 immune checkpoint blocking monoclonal antibodies in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a phase I clinical trial |
title_full | Intracerebral administration of CTLA-4 and PD-1 immune checkpoint blocking monoclonal antibodies in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a phase I clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Intracerebral administration of CTLA-4 and PD-1 immune checkpoint blocking monoclonal antibodies in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a phase I clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Intracerebral administration of CTLA-4 and PD-1 immune checkpoint blocking monoclonal antibodies in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a phase I clinical trial |
title_short | Intracerebral administration of CTLA-4 and PD-1 immune checkpoint blocking monoclonal antibodies in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a phase I clinical trial |
title_sort | intracerebral administration of ctla-4 and pd-1 immune checkpoint blocking monoclonal antibodies in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a phase i clinical trial |
topic | Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34168003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-002296 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duerinckjohnny intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial AT schwarzejuliakatharina intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial AT awadagil intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial AT tijtgatjens intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial AT vaeyensfreya intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial AT bertelscleo intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial AT geenswietse intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial AT kleinsamuel intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial AT seynaevelaura intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial AT craslouise intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial AT dhaenenicky intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial AT michottealex intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial AT caljonben intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial AT salmonisabelle intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial AT bruneaumichael intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial AT kockxmark intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial AT vandoorensonia intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial AT vanbinstannemarie intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial AT everaerthendrik intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial AT forsythramses intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial AT neynsbart intracerebraladministrationofctla4andpd1immunecheckpointblockingmonoclonalantibodiesinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaaphaseiclinicaltrial |