Cargando…

Facilitating advance care planning in the general practice setting for patients with a chronic, life-limiting illness: protocol for a phase-III cluster-randomized controlled trial and process evaluation of the ACP-GP intervention

BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP), a process of communication about patients’ preferences for future medical care, should be initiated in a timely manner. Ideally situated for this initiation is the general practitioner (GP). The intervention to improve the initiation of ACP for patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stevens, Julie, Pype, Peter, Eecloo, Kim, Deliens, Luc, Pardon, Koen, De Vleminck, Aline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34172030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00796-1
_version_ 1783713347226566656
author Stevens, Julie
Pype, Peter
Eecloo, Kim
Deliens, Luc
Pardon, Koen
De Vleminck, Aline
author_facet Stevens, Julie
Pype, Peter
Eecloo, Kim
Deliens, Luc
Pardon, Koen
De Vleminck, Aline
author_sort Stevens, Julie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP), a process of communication about patients’ preferences for future medical care, should be initiated in a timely manner. Ideally situated for this initiation is the general practitioner (GP). The intervention to improve the initiation of ACP for patients with a chronic life-limiting illness in general practice (ACP-GP) includes an ACP workbook for patients, ACP communication training for GPs, planned ACP conversations, and documentation of ACP conversation outcomes in a structured template. We present the study protocol of a Phase-III randomized controlled trial (RCT) of ACP-GP that aims to evaluate its effects on outcomes at the GP, patient, and surrogate decision maker (SDM) levels; and to assess the implementation process of the intervention. METHODS: This RCT will take place in Flanders, Belgium. Thirty-six GPs, 108 patients with a chronic, life-limiting illness, and their (potential) SDM will be recruited, then cluster-randomized to the ACP-GP intervention or the control condition. The primary outcome for GPs is ACP self-efficacy; primary outcome for patients is level of ACP engagement. Secondary outcomes for GPs are ACP practices, knowledge and attitudes; and documentation of ACP discussion outcomes. Secondary outcomes for patients are quality of life; anxiety; depression; appointment of an SDM; completion of new ACP documents; thinking about ACP; and communication with the GP. The secondary outcome for the SDM is level of engagement with ACP. A process evaluation will assess the recruitment and implementation of the intervention using the RE-AIM framework. DISCUSSION: While the general practice setting holds promise for timely initiation of ACP, there is a lack of randomized trial studies evaluating the effectiveness of ACP interventions implemented in this setting. After this Phase-III RCT, we will be able to present valuable evidence of the effects of this ACP-GP intervention, with the potential for offering a well-tested and evaluated program to be implemented in general practice. The results of the process evaluation will provide insight into what contributes to or detracts from implementation success, as well as how the intervention can be adapted to specific contexts or needs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered at with ISRCTN (ISRCTN12995230); registered 19/06/2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-021-00796-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8231078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82310782021-06-28 Facilitating advance care planning in the general practice setting for patients with a chronic, life-limiting illness: protocol for a phase-III cluster-randomized controlled trial and process evaluation of the ACP-GP intervention Stevens, Julie Pype, Peter Eecloo, Kim Deliens, Luc Pardon, Koen De Vleminck, Aline BMC Palliat Care Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP), a process of communication about patients’ preferences for future medical care, should be initiated in a timely manner. Ideally situated for this initiation is the general practitioner (GP). The intervention to improve the initiation of ACP for patients with a chronic life-limiting illness in general practice (ACP-GP) includes an ACP workbook for patients, ACP communication training for GPs, planned ACP conversations, and documentation of ACP conversation outcomes in a structured template. We present the study protocol of a Phase-III randomized controlled trial (RCT) of ACP-GP that aims to evaluate its effects on outcomes at the GP, patient, and surrogate decision maker (SDM) levels; and to assess the implementation process of the intervention. METHODS: This RCT will take place in Flanders, Belgium. Thirty-six GPs, 108 patients with a chronic, life-limiting illness, and their (potential) SDM will be recruited, then cluster-randomized to the ACP-GP intervention or the control condition. The primary outcome for GPs is ACP self-efficacy; primary outcome for patients is level of ACP engagement. Secondary outcomes for GPs are ACP practices, knowledge and attitudes; and documentation of ACP discussion outcomes. Secondary outcomes for patients are quality of life; anxiety; depression; appointment of an SDM; completion of new ACP documents; thinking about ACP; and communication with the GP. The secondary outcome for the SDM is level of engagement with ACP. A process evaluation will assess the recruitment and implementation of the intervention using the RE-AIM framework. DISCUSSION: While the general practice setting holds promise for timely initiation of ACP, there is a lack of randomized trial studies evaluating the effectiveness of ACP interventions implemented in this setting. After this Phase-III RCT, we will be able to present valuable evidence of the effects of this ACP-GP intervention, with the potential for offering a well-tested and evaluated program to be implemented in general practice. The results of the process evaluation will provide insight into what contributes to or detracts from implementation success, as well as how the intervention can be adapted to specific contexts or needs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered at with ISRCTN (ISRCTN12995230); registered 19/06/2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-021-00796-1. BioMed Central 2021-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8231078/ /pubmed/34172030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00796-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Stevens, Julie
Pype, Peter
Eecloo, Kim
Deliens, Luc
Pardon, Koen
De Vleminck, Aline
Facilitating advance care planning in the general practice setting for patients with a chronic, life-limiting illness: protocol for a phase-III cluster-randomized controlled trial and process evaluation of the ACP-GP intervention
title Facilitating advance care planning in the general practice setting for patients with a chronic, life-limiting illness: protocol for a phase-III cluster-randomized controlled trial and process evaluation of the ACP-GP intervention
title_full Facilitating advance care planning in the general practice setting for patients with a chronic, life-limiting illness: protocol for a phase-III cluster-randomized controlled trial and process evaluation of the ACP-GP intervention
title_fullStr Facilitating advance care planning in the general practice setting for patients with a chronic, life-limiting illness: protocol for a phase-III cluster-randomized controlled trial and process evaluation of the ACP-GP intervention
title_full_unstemmed Facilitating advance care planning in the general practice setting for patients with a chronic, life-limiting illness: protocol for a phase-III cluster-randomized controlled trial and process evaluation of the ACP-GP intervention
title_short Facilitating advance care planning in the general practice setting for patients with a chronic, life-limiting illness: protocol for a phase-III cluster-randomized controlled trial and process evaluation of the ACP-GP intervention
title_sort facilitating advance care planning in the general practice setting for patients with a chronic, life-limiting illness: protocol for a phase-iii cluster-randomized controlled trial and process evaluation of the acp-gp intervention
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34172030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00796-1
work_keys_str_mv AT stevensjulie facilitatingadvancecareplanninginthegeneralpracticesettingforpatientswithachroniclifelimitingillnessprotocolforaphaseiiiclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialandprocessevaluationoftheacpgpintervention
AT pypepeter facilitatingadvancecareplanninginthegeneralpracticesettingforpatientswithachroniclifelimitingillnessprotocolforaphaseiiiclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialandprocessevaluationoftheacpgpintervention
AT eeclookim facilitatingadvancecareplanninginthegeneralpracticesettingforpatientswithachroniclifelimitingillnessprotocolforaphaseiiiclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialandprocessevaluationoftheacpgpintervention
AT deliensluc facilitatingadvancecareplanninginthegeneralpracticesettingforpatientswithachroniclifelimitingillnessprotocolforaphaseiiiclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialandprocessevaluationoftheacpgpintervention
AT pardonkoen facilitatingadvancecareplanninginthegeneralpracticesettingforpatientswithachroniclifelimitingillnessprotocolforaphaseiiiclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialandprocessevaluationoftheacpgpintervention
AT devleminckaline facilitatingadvancecareplanninginthegeneralpracticesettingforpatientswithachroniclifelimitingillnessprotocolforaphaseiiiclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialandprocessevaluationoftheacpgpintervention