Cargando…

Supermicrosurgical Suture-Stent Technique for A Lymphaticovenular Bypass

Background: Lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) is a challenging procedure and requires a sophisticated supermicrosurgical technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate and establish a discrete supermicrosurgical anastomosis method using the “suture-stent technique”. Methods: Forty-eight LVA site...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karakawa, Ryo, Yoshimatsu, Hidehiko, Kamiya, Keisuke, Fuse, Yuma, Yano, Tomoyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34208378
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122595
_version_ 1783713397453357056
author Karakawa, Ryo
Yoshimatsu, Hidehiko
Kamiya, Keisuke
Fuse, Yuma
Yano, Tomoyuki
author_facet Karakawa, Ryo
Yoshimatsu, Hidehiko
Kamiya, Keisuke
Fuse, Yuma
Yano, Tomoyuki
author_sort Karakawa, Ryo
collection PubMed
description Background: Lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) is a challenging procedure and requires a sophisticated supermicrosurgical technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate and establish a discrete supermicrosurgical anastomosis method using the “suture-stent technique”. Methods: Forty-eight LVA sites of twenty patients with lower extremity lymphedema who had undergone LVA between July 2020 and January 2021 were included in this study. LVA was performed with the conventional technique or with the suture-stent technique. The patency of the anastomoses was evaluated using an infrared camera system intraoperatively. The success rate on the first try and the final success rate for each group were compared. Results: After full application of the exclusion criteria, 35 LVAs of 16 patients including 20 limbs were included in the analysis. The ratio of good patency findings after anastomosis in the suture-stent technique group was 100%. The incidences of leakage or occlusion on the first try were statistically greater in the conventional technique group (29.4%) than in the suture-stent technique group (0%) (p = 0.0191). All anastomoses achieved good patency in the final results. Conclusion: With its minimal risk of catching the back wall during the anastomosis, the suture-stent technique can be considered an optimal anastomosis option for LVA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8231290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82312902021-06-26 Supermicrosurgical Suture-Stent Technique for A Lymphaticovenular Bypass Karakawa, Ryo Yoshimatsu, Hidehiko Kamiya, Keisuke Fuse, Yuma Yano, Tomoyuki J Clin Med Article Background: Lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) is a challenging procedure and requires a sophisticated supermicrosurgical technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate and establish a discrete supermicrosurgical anastomosis method using the “suture-stent technique”. Methods: Forty-eight LVA sites of twenty patients with lower extremity lymphedema who had undergone LVA between July 2020 and January 2021 were included in this study. LVA was performed with the conventional technique or with the suture-stent technique. The patency of the anastomoses was evaluated using an infrared camera system intraoperatively. The success rate on the first try and the final success rate for each group were compared. Results: After full application of the exclusion criteria, 35 LVAs of 16 patients including 20 limbs were included in the analysis. The ratio of good patency findings after anastomosis in the suture-stent technique group was 100%. The incidences of leakage or occlusion on the first try were statistically greater in the conventional technique group (29.4%) than in the suture-stent technique group (0%) (p = 0.0191). All anastomoses achieved good patency in the final results. Conclusion: With its minimal risk of catching the back wall during the anastomosis, the suture-stent technique can be considered an optimal anastomosis option for LVA. MDPI 2021-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8231290/ /pubmed/34208378 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122595 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Karakawa, Ryo
Yoshimatsu, Hidehiko
Kamiya, Keisuke
Fuse, Yuma
Yano, Tomoyuki
Supermicrosurgical Suture-Stent Technique for A Lymphaticovenular Bypass
title Supermicrosurgical Suture-Stent Technique for A Lymphaticovenular Bypass
title_full Supermicrosurgical Suture-Stent Technique for A Lymphaticovenular Bypass
title_fullStr Supermicrosurgical Suture-Stent Technique for A Lymphaticovenular Bypass
title_full_unstemmed Supermicrosurgical Suture-Stent Technique for A Lymphaticovenular Bypass
title_short Supermicrosurgical Suture-Stent Technique for A Lymphaticovenular Bypass
title_sort supermicrosurgical suture-stent technique for a lymphaticovenular bypass
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34208378
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122595
work_keys_str_mv AT karakawaryo supermicrosurgicalsuturestenttechniqueforalymphaticovenularbypass
AT yoshimatsuhidehiko supermicrosurgicalsuturestenttechniqueforalymphaticovenularbypass
AT kamiyakeisuke supermicrosurgicalsuturestenttechniqueforalymphaticovenularbypass
AT fuseyuma supermicrosurgicalsuturestenttechniqueforalymphaticovenularbypass
AT yanotomoyuki supermicrosurgicalsuturestenttechniqueforalymphaticovenularbypass