Cargando…
Supermicrosurgical Suture-Stent Technique for A Lymphaticovenular Bypass
Background: Lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) is a challenging procedure and requires a sophisticated supermicrosurgical technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate and establish a discrete supermicrosurgical anastomosis method using the “suture-stent technique”. Methods: Forty-eight LVA site...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34208378 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122595 |
_version_ | 1783713397453357056 |
---|---|
author | Karakawa, Ryo Yoshimatsu, Hidehiko Kamiya, Keisuke Fuse, Yuma Yano, Tomoyuki |
author_facet | Karakawa, Ryo Yoshimatsu, Hidehiko Kamiya, Keisuke Fuse, Yuma Yano, Tomoyuki |
author_sort | Karakawa, Ryo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) is a challenging procedure and requires a sophisticated supermicrosurgical technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate and establish a discrete supermicrosurgical anastomosis method using the “suture-stent technique”. Methods: Forty-eight LVA sites of twenty patients with lower extremity lymphedema who had undergone LVA between July 2020 and January 2021 were included in this study. LVA was performed with the conventional technique or with the suture-stent technique. The patency of the anastomoses was evaluated using an infrared camera system intraoperatively. The success rate on the first try and the final success rate for each group were compared. Results: After full application of the exclusion criteria, 35 LVAs of 16 patients including 20 limbs were included in the analysis. The ratio of good patency findings after anastomosis in the suture-stent technique group was 100%. The incidences of leakage or occlusion on the first try were statistically greater in the conventional technique group (29.4%) than in the suture-stent technique group (0%) (p = 0.0191). All anastomoses achieved good patency in the final results. Conclusion: With its minimal risk of catching the back wall during the anastomosis, the suture-stent technique can be considered an optimal anastomosis option for LVA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8231290 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82312902021-06-26 Supermicrosurgical Suture-Stent Technique for A Lymphaticovenular Bypass Karakawa, Ryo Yoshimatsu, Hidehiko Kamiya, Keisuke Fuse, Yuma Yano, Tomoyuki J Clin Med Article Background: Lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) is a challenging procedure and requires a sophisticated supermicrosurgical technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate and establish a discrete supermicrosurgical anastomosis method using the “suture-stent technique”. Methods: Forty-eight LVA sites of twenty patients with lower extremity lymphedema who had undergone LVA between July 2020 and January 2021 were included in this study. LVA was performed with the conventional technique or with the suture-stent technique. The patency of the anastomoses was evaluated using an infrared camera system intraoperatively. The success rate on the first try and the final success rate for each group were compared. Results: After full application of the exclusion criteria, 35 LVAs of 16 patients including 20 limbs were included in the analysis. The ratio of good patency findings after anastomosis in the suture-stent technique group was 100%. The incidences of leakage or occlusion on the first try were statistically greater in the conventional technique group (29.4%) than in the suture-stent technique group (0%) (p = 0.0191). All anastomoses achieved good patency in the final results. Conclusion: With its minimal risk of catching the back wall during the anastomosis, the suture-stent technique can be considered an optimal anastomosis option for LVA. MDPI 2021-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8231290/ /pubmed/34208378 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122595 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Karakawa, Ryo Yoshimatsu, Hidehiko Kamiya, Keisuke Fuse, Yuma Yano, Tomoyuki Supermicrosurgical Suture-Stent Technique for A Lymphaticovenular Bypass |
title | Supermicrosurgical Suture-Stent Technique for A Lymphaticovenular Bypass |
title_full | Supermicrosurgical Suture-Stent Technique for A Lymphaticovenular Bypass |
title_fullStr | Supermicrosurgical Suture-Stent Technique for A Lymphaticovenular Bypass |
title_full_unstemmed | Supermicrosurgical Suture-Stent Technique for A Lymphaticovenular Bypass |
title_short | Supermicrosurgical Suture-Stent Technique for A Lymphaticovenular Bypass |
title_sort | supermicrosurgical suture-stent technique for a lymphaticovenular bypass |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34208378 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122595 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karakawaryo supermicrosurgicalsuturestenttechniqueforalymphaticovenularbypass AT yoshimatsuhidehiko supermicrosurgicalsuturestenttechniqueforalymphaticovenularbypass AT kamiyakeisuke supermicrosurgicalsuturestenttechniqueforalymphaticovenularbypass AT fuseyuma supermicrosurgicalsuturestenttechniqueforalymphaticovenularbypass AT yanotomoyuki supermicrosurgicalsuturestenttechniqueforalymphaticovenularbypass |