Cargando…
Evaluating active versus passive sources of human brucellosis in Jining City, China
Human brucellosis (HB) remains a serious public health concern owing to its resurgence across the globe and specifically in China. The timely detection of this disease is the key to its prevention and control. We sought to describe the differences in the demographics of high-risk populations with de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34221727 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11637 |
_version_ | 1783713402824163328 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Xihong Jiang, Wenguo Li, Yan Li, Xiuchun Zeng, Qingyi Du, Juan Yin, Aitian Lu, Qing-Bin |
author_facet | Sun, Xihong Jiang, Wenguo Li, Yan Li, Xiuchun Zeng, Qingyi Du, Juan Yin, Aitian Lu, Qing-Bin |
author_sort | Sun, Xihong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Human brucellosis (HB) remains a serious public health concern owing to its resurgence across the globe and specifically in China. The timely detection of this disease is the key to its prevention and control. We sought to describe the differences in the demographics of high-risk populations with detected cases of HB contracted from active versus passive sources. We collected data from a large sample population from January to December 2018, in Jining City, China. We recruited patients that were at high-risk for brucellosis from three hospitals and Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDCs). These patients were classified into two groups: the active detection group was composed of individuals receiving brucellosis counseling at the CDCs; the passive detection group came from hospitals and high-risk HB groups. We tested a total of 2,247 subjects and 13.3% (299) presented as positive for HB. The positive rates for active and passive detection groups were 20.5% (256/1,249) and 4.3% (43/998), respectively (p < 0.001). The detection rate of confirmed HB cases varied among all groups but was higher in the active detection group than in the passive detection group when controlled for age, sex, ethnicity, education, career, and contact history with sheep or cattle (p < 0.05). Males, farmers, those with four types of contact history with sheep or cattle, and those presenting fever, hyperhidrosis and muscle pain were independent factors associated with confirmed HB cases in multivariate analysis of the active detection group. Active detection is the most common method used to detect brucellosis cases and should be applied to detect HB cases early and avoid misdiagnosis. We need to improve our understanding of brucellosis for high-risk populations. Passive HB detection can be supplemented with active detection when the cognitive changes resulting from brucellosis are low. It is important that healthcare providers understand and emphasis the timely diagnosis of HB. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8231335 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82313352021-07-01 Evaluating active versus passive sources of human brucellosis in Jining City, China Sun, Xihong Jiang, Wenguo Li, Yan Li, Xiuchun Zeng, Qingyi Du, Juan Yin, Aitian Lu, Qing-Bin PeerJ Epidemiology Human brucellosis (HB) remains a serious public health concern owing to its resurgence across the globe and specifically in China. The timely detection of this disease is the key to its prevention and control. We sought to describe the differences in the demographics of high-risk populations with detected cases of HB contracted from active versus passive sources. We collected data from a large sample population from January to December 2018, in Jining City, China. We recruited patients that were at high-risk for brucellosis from three hospitals and Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDCs). These patients were classified into two groups: the active detection group was composed of individuals receiving brucellosis counseling at the CDCs; the passive detection group came from hospitals and high-risk HB groups. We tested a total of 2,247 subjects and 13.3% (299) presented as positive for HB. The positive rates for active and passive detection groups were 20.5% (256/1,249) and 4.3% (43/998), respectively (p < 0.001). The detection rate of confirmed HB cases varied among all groups but was higher in the active detection group than in the passive detection group when controlled for age, sex, ethnicity, education, career, and contact history with sheep or cattle (p < 0.05). Males, farmers, those with four types of contact history with sheep or cattle, and those presenting fever, hyperhidrosis and muscle pain were independent factors associated with confirmed HB cases in multivariate analysis of the active detection group. Active detection is the most common method used to detect brucellosis cases and should be applied to detect HB cases early and avoid misdiagnosis. We need to improve our understanding of brucellosis for high-risk populations. Passive HB detection can be supplemented with active detection when the cognitive changes resulting from brucellosis are low. It is important that healthcare providers understand and emphasis the timely diagnosis of HB. PeerJ Inc. 2021-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8231335/ /pubmed/34221727 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11637 Text en © 2021 Sun et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Sun, Xihong Jiang, Wenguo Li, Yan Li, Xiuchun Zeng, Qingyi Du, Juan Yin, Aitian Lu, Qing-Bin Evaluating active versus passive sources of human brucellosis in Jining City, China |
title | Evaluating active versus passive sources of human brucellosis in Jining City, China |
title_full | Evaluating active versus passive sources of human brucellosis in Jining City, China |
title_fullStr | Evaluating active versus passive sources of human brucellosis in Jining City, China |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating active versus passive sources of human brucellosis in Jining City, China |
title_short | Evaluating active versus passive sources of human brucellosis in Jining City, China |
title_sort | evaluating active versus passive sources of human brucellosis in jining city, china |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34221727 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11637 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunxihong evaluatingactiveversuspassivesourcesofhumanbrucellosisinjiningcitychina AT jiangwenguo evaluatingactiveversuspassivesourcesofhumanbrucellosisinjiningcitychina AT liyan evaluatingactiveversuspassivesourcesofhumanbrucellosisinjiningcitychina AT lixiuchun evaluatingactiveversuspassivesourcesofhumanbrucellosisinjiningcitychina AT zengqingyi evaluatingactiveversuspassivesourcesofhumanbrucellosisinjiningcitychina AT dujuan evaluatingactiveversuspassivesourcesofhumanbrucellosisinjiningcitychina AT yinaitian evaluatingactiveversuspassivesourcesofhumanbrucellosisinjiningcitychina AT luqingbin evaluatingactiveversuspassivesourcesofhumanbrucellosisinjiningcitychina |