Cargando…

Evaluating active versus passive sources of human brucellosis in Jining City, China

Human brucellosis (HB) remains a serious public health concern owing to its resurgence across the globe and specifically in China. The timely detection of this disease is the key to its prevention and control. We sought to describe the differences in the demographics of high-risk populations with de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Xihong, Jiang, Wenguo, Li, Yan, Li, Xiuchun, Zeng, Qingyi, Du, Juan, Yin, Aitian, Lu, Qing-Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34221727
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11637
_version_ 1783713402824163328
author Sun, Xihong
Jiang, Wenguo
Li, Yan
Li, Xiuchun
Zeng, Qingyi
Du, Juan
Yin, Aitian
Lu, Qing-Bin
author_facet Sun, Xihong
Jiang, Wenguo
Li, Yan
Li, Xiuchun
Zeng, Qingyi
Du, Juan
Yin, Aitian
Lu, Qing-Bin
author_sort Sun, Xihong
collection PubMed
description Human brucellosis (HB) remains a serious public health concern owing to its resurgence across the globe and specifically in China. The timely detection of this disease is the key to its prevention and control. We sought to describe the differences in the demographics of high-risk populations with detected cases of HB contracted from active versus passive sources. We collected data from a large sample population from January to December 2018, in Jining City, China. We recruited patients that were at high-risk for brucellosis from three hospitals and Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDCs). These patients were classified into two groups: the active detection group was composed of individuals receiving brucellosis counseling at the CDCs; the passive detection group came from hospitals and high-risk HB groups. We tested a total of 2,247 subjects and 13.3% (299) presented as positive for HB. The positive rates for active and passive detection groups were 20.5% (256/1,249) and 4.3% (43/998), respectively (p < 0.001). The detection rate of confirmed HB cases varied among all groups but was higher in the active detection group than in the passive detection group when controlled for age, sex, ethnicity, education, career, and contact history with sheep or cattle (p < 0.05). Males, farmers, those with four types of contact history with sheep or cattle, and those presenting fever, hyperhidrosis and muscle pain were independent factors associated with confirmed HB cases in multivariate analysis of the active detection group. Active detection is the most common method used to detect brucellosis cases and should be applied to detect HB cases early and avoid misdiagnosis. We need to improve our understanding of brucellosis for high-risk populations. Passive HB detection can be supplemented with active detection when the cognitive changes resulting from brucellosis are low. It is important that healthcare providers understand and emphasis the timely diagnosis of HB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8231335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82313352021-07-01 Evaluating active versus passive sources of human brucellosis in Jining City, China Sun, Xihong Jiang, Wenguo Li, Yan Li, Xiuchun Zeng, Qingyi Du, Juan Yin, Aitian Lu, Qing-Bin PeerJ Epidemiology Human brucellosis (HB) remains a serious public health concern owing to its resurgence across the globe and specifically in China. The timely detection of this disease is the key to its prevention and control. We sought to describe the differences in the demographics of high-risk populations with detected cases of HB contracted from active versus passive sources. We collected data from a large sample population from January to December 2018, in Jining City, China. We recruited patients that were at high-risk for brucellosis from three hospitals and Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDCs). These patients were classified into two groups: the active detection group was composed of individuals receiving brucellosis counseling at the CDCs; the passive detection group came from hospitals and high-risk HB groups. We tested a total of 2,247 subjects and 13.3% (299) presented as positive for HB. The positive rates for active and passive detection groups were 20.5% (256/1,249) and 4.3% (43/998), respectively (p < 0.001). The detection rate of confirmed HB cases varied among all groups but was higher in the active detection group than in the passive detection group when controlled for age, sex, ethnicity, education, career, and contact history with sheep or cattle (p < 0.05). Males, farmers, those with four types of contact history with sheep or cattle, and those presenting fever, hyperhidrosis and muscle pain were independent factors associated with confirmed HB cases in multivariate analysis of the active detection group. Active detection is the most common method used to detect brucellosis cases and should be applied to detect HB cases early and avoid misdiagnosis. We need to improve our understanding of brucellosis for high-risk populations. Passive HB detection can be supplemented with active detection when the cognitive changes resulting from brucellosis are low. It is important that healthcare providers understand and emphasis the timely diagnosis of HB. PeerJ Inc. 2021-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8231335/ /pubmed/34221727 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11637 Text en © 2021 Sun et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Sun, Xihong
Jiang, Wenguo
Li, Yan
Li, Xiuchun
Zeng, Qingyi
Du, Juan
Yin, Aitian
Lu, Qing-Bin
Evaluating active versus passive sources of human brucellosis in Jining City, China
title Evaluating active versus passive sources of human brucellosis in Jining City, China
title_full Evaluating active versus passive sources of human brucellosis in Jining City, China
title_fullStr Evaluating active versus passive sources of human brucellosis in Jining City, China
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating active versus passive sources of human brucellosis in Jining City, China
title_short Evaluating active versus passive sources of human brucellosis in Jining City, China
title_sort evaluating active versus passive sources of human brucellosis in jining city, china
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34221727
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11637
work_keys_str_mv AT sunxihong evaluatingactiveversuspassivesourcesofhumanbrucellosisinjiningcitychina
AT jiangwenguo evaluatingactiveversuspassivesourcesofhumanbrucellosisinjiningcitychina
AT liyan evaluatingactiveversuspassivesourcesofhumanbrucellosisinjiningcitychina
AT lixiuchun evaluatingactiveversuspassivesourcesofhumanbrucellosisinjiningcitychina
AT zengqingyi evaluatingactiveversuspassivesourcesofhumanbrucellosisinjiningcitychina
AT dujuan evaluatingactiveversuspassivesourcesofhumanbrucellosisinjiningcitychina
AT yinaitian evaluatingactiveversuspassivesourcesofhumanbrucellosisinjiningcitychina
AT luqingbin evaluatingactiveversuspassivesourcesofhumanbrucellosisinjiningcitychina