Cargando…

Reoperations after decompression with or without fusion for L4–5 spinal stenosis with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis: a study of 6,532 patients in Swespine, the national Swedish spine register

Background and purpose — There are different opinions on how to surgically address lumbar spinal stenosis with concomitant degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). We investigated reoperation rates at the index and adjacent levels after L4–5 fusion surgery in a large cohort of unselected patients regist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joelson, Anders, Nerelius, Fredrik, Holy, Marek, Sigmundsson, Freyr Gauti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33506701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2021.1879505
_version_ 1783713404947529728
author Joelson, Anders
Nerelius, Fredrik
Holy, Marek
Sigmundsson, Freyr Gauti
author_facet Joelson, Anders
Nerelius, Fredrik
Holy, Marek
Sigmundsson, Freyr Gauti
author_sort Joelson, Anders
collection PubMed
description Background and purpose — There are different opinions on how to surgically address lumbar spinal stenosis with concomitant degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). We investigated reoperation rates at the index and adjacent levels after L4–5 fusion surgery in a large cohort of unselected patients registered in Swespine, the national Swedish spine register. Patients and methods — 6,532 patients, who underwent surgery for L4–5 spinal stenosis with or without DS between 2007 and 2012, were followed up to 2017 to identify reoperations at the index and adjacent levels. The reoperation rates for decompression and fusion were compared with the reoperation rates for decompression only and for patients with or without DS. Patient-reported outcome data were collected preoperatively, and at 1 and 2 years after surgery and used to evaluate differences in outcome between index operations and reoperations. Results — For spinal stenosis with DS, the reoperation rate at the index level was 3.0% for decompression and fusion and 6.0% for decompression only. At the adjacent level, the corresponding numbers were 9.7% and 4.2% respectively. For spinal stenosis without DS, the reoperation rate at the index level was 3.7% for decompression and fusion and 6.2% after decompression only. At the adjacent level, the corresponding numbers were 8.1% and 3.8% respectively. For the reoperations at the adjacent level, there was no difference in patient-reported outcome between extended fusion or decompression only. Interpretation — Single-level lumbar fusion surgery is associated with an increased rate of reoperations at the adjacent level compared with decompression only. When reoperations at the index level are included there is no difference in reoperation rates between fusion and decompression only.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8231344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82313442021-07-01 Reoperations after decompression with or without fusion for L4–5 spinal stenosis with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis: a study of 6,532 patients in Swespine, the national Swedish spine register Joelson, Anders Nerelius, Fredrik Holy, Marek Sigmundsson, Freyr Gauti Acta Orthop Research Article Background and purpose — There are different opinions on how to surgically address lumbar spinal stenosis with concomitant degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). We investigated reoperation rates at the index and adjacent levels after L4–5 fusion surgery in a large cohort of unselected patients registered in Swespine, the national Swedish spine register. Patients and methods — 6,532 patients, who underwent surgery for L4–5 spinal stenosis with or without DS between 2007 and 2012, were followed up to 2017 to identify reoperations at the index and adjacent levels. The reoperation rates for decompression and fusion were compared with the reoperation rates for decompression only and for patients with or without DS. Patient-reported outcome data were collected preoperatively, and at 1 and 2 years after surgery and used to evaluate differences in outcome between index operations and reoperations. Results — For spinal stenosis with DS, the reoperation rate at the index level was 3.0% for decompression and fusion and 6.0% for decompression only. At the adjacent level, the corresponding numbers were 9.7% and 4.2% respectively. For spinal stenosis without DS, the reoperation rate at the index level was 3.7% for decompression and fusion and 6.2% after decompression only. At the adjacent level, the corresponding numbers were 8.1% and 3.8% respectively. For the reoperations at the adjacent level, there was no difference in patient-reported outcome between extended fusion or decompression only. Interpretation — Single-level lumbar fusion surgery is associated with an increased rate of reoperations at the adjacent level compared with decompression only. When reoperations at the index level are included there is no difference in reoperation rates between fusion and decompression only. Taylor & Francis 2021-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8231344/ /pubmed/33506701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2021.1879505 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Joelson, Anders
Nerelius, Fredrik
Holy, Marek
Sigmundsson, Freyr Gauti
Reoperations after decompression with or without fusion for L4–5 spinal stenosis with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis: a study of 6,532 patients in Swespine, the national Swedish spine register
title Reoperations after decompression with or without fusion for L4–5 spinal stenosis with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis: a study of 6,532 patients in Swespine, the national Swedish spine register
title_full Reoperations after decompression with or without fusion for L4–5 spinal stenosis with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis: a study of 6,532 patients in Swespine, the national Swedish spine register
title_fullStr Reoperations after decompression with or without fusion for L4–5 spinal stenosis with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis: a study of 6,532 patients in Swespine, the national Swedish spine register
title_full_unstemmed Reoperations after decompression with or without fusion for L4–5 spinal stenosis with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis: a study of 6,532 patients in Swespine, the national Swedish spine register
title_short Reoperations after decompression with or without fusion for L4–5 spinal stenosis with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis: a study of 6,532 patients in Swespine, the national Swedish spine register
title_sort reoperations after decompression with or without fusion for l4–5 spinal stenosis with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis: a study of 6,532 patients in swespine, the national swedish spine register
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33506701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2021.1879505
work_keys_str_mv AT joelsonanders reoperationsafterdecompressionwithorwithoutfusionforl45spinalstenosiswithorwithoutdegenerativespondylolisthesisastudyof6532patientsinswespinethenationalswedishspineregister
AT nereliusfredrik reoperationsafterdecompressionwithorwithoutfusionforl45spinalstenosiswithorwithoutdegenerativespondylolisthesisastudyof6532patientsinswespinethenationalswedishspineregister
AT holymarek reoperationsafterdecompressionwithorwithoutfusionforl45spinalstenosiswithorwithoutdegenerativespondylolisthesisastudyof6532patientsinswespinethenationalswedishspineregister
AT sigmundssonfreyrgauti reoperationsafterdecompressionwithorwithoutfusionforl45spinalstenosiswithorwithoutdegenerativespondylolisthesisastudyof6532patientsinswespinethenationalswedishspineregister