Cargando…
What is the association between MRI and conventional radiography in measuring femoral head migration?
Background and purpose — Pelvic radiographs are traditionally used for assessing femoral head migration in residual acetabular dysplasia (RAD). Knowledge of the heightened importance of cartilaginous structures in this condition has led to increased use of MRI in assessing both osseous and cartilagi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33390057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1864124 |
_version_ | 1783713405183459328 |
---|---|
author | Husum, Hans-Christen Hellfritzsch, Michel Bach Henriksen, Mads Duch, Kirsten Skjaerbaek Gottliebsen, Martin Rahbek, Ole |
author_facet | Husum, Hans-Christen Hellfritzsch, Michel Bach Henriksen, Mads Duch, Kirsten Skjaerbaek Gottliebsen, Martin Rahbek, Ole |
author_sort | Husum, Hans-Christen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and purpose — Pelvic radiographs are traditionally used for assessing femoral head migration in residual acetabular dysplasia (RAD). Knowledge of the heightened importance of cartilaginous structures in this condition has led to increased use of MRI in assessing both osseous and cartilaginous structures of the pediatric hip. Therefore, we assessed the relationship between migration percentages (MP) found on MRI and conventional radiographs. Second, we analyzed the reliability of MP in MRI and radiographs. Patients and methods — We retrospectively identified 16 patients (mean age 5 years [2–8], 14 girls), examined for RAD during a period of 2½ years. 4 raters performed blinded repeated measurements of osseous migration percentage (MP) and cartilaginous migration percentage (CMP) in MRI and radiographs. Pelvic rotation and tilt indices were measured in radiographs. Bland–Altman (B–A) plots and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for agreement and reliability. Results — B–A plots for MP(R) and MP(MRI) produced a mean difference of 6.4 with limits of agreement –11 to 24, with higher disagreements at low average MP values. Mean MP(R) differed from mean MP(MRI) (17% versus 23%, p < 0.001). MP(R) had the best interrater reliability with an ICC of 0.92 (0.86–0.96), compared with MP(MRI) and CMP with ICC values of 0.61 (0.45–0.70) and 0.52 (0.26–0.69), respectively. Intrarater reliability for MP(R), MP(MRI) and CMP all had ICC values above 0.75 and did not differ statistically significantly. Differences inMP(MRI) and MP(R) showed no correlation to pelvic rotation index, pelvic tilt index, or interval between radiograph and MRI exams. Interpretation — Pelvic radiographs underestimated MP when compared with pelvic MRI. We propose CMP as a new imaging measurement, and conclude that it has good intrarater reliability but moderate interrater reliability. Measurement of MP in radiographs and MRI had mediocre to excellent reliability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8231345 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82313452021-07-01 What is the association between MRI and conventional radiography in measuring femoral head migration? Husum, Hans-Christen Hellfritzsch, Michel Bach Henriksen, Mads Duch, Kirsten Skjaerbaek Gottliebsen, Martin Rahbek, Ole Acta Orthop Research Article Background and purpose — Pelvic radiographs are traditionally used for assessing femoral head migration in residual acetabular dysplasia (RAD). Knowledge of the heightened importance of cartilaginous structures in this condition has led to increased use of MRI in assessing both osseous and cartilaginous structures of the pediatric hip. Therefore, we assessed the relationship between migration percentages (MP) found on MRI and conventional radiographs. Second, we analyzed the reliability of MP in MRI and radiographs. Patients and methods — We retrospectively identified 16 patients (mean age 5 years [2–8], 14 girls), examined for RAD during a period of 2½ years. 4 raters performed blinded repeated measurements of osseous migration percentage (MP) and cartilaginous migration percentage (CMP) in MRI and radiographs. Pelvic rotation and tilt indices were measured in radiographs. Bland–Altman (B–A) plots and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for agreement and reliability. Results — B–A plots for MP(R) and MP(MRI) produced a mean difference of 6.4 with limits of agreement –11 to 24, with higher disagreements at low average MP values. Mean MP(R) differed from mean MP(MRI) (17% versus 23%, p < 0.001). MP(R) had the best interrater reliability with an ICC of 0.92 (0.86–0.96), compared with MP(MRI) and CMP with ICC values of 0.61 (0.45–0.70) and 0.52 (0.26–0.69), respectively. Intrarater reliability for MP(R), MP(MRI) and CMP all had ICC values above 0.75 and did not differ statistically significantly. Differences inMP(MRI) and MP(R) showed no correlation to pelvic rotation index, pelvic tilt index, or interval between radiograph and MRI exams. Interpretation — Pelvic radiographs underestimated MP when compared with pelvic MRI. We propose CMP as a new imaging measurement, and conclude that it has good intrarater reliability but moderate interrater reliability. Measurement of MP in radiographs and MRI had mediocre to excellent reliability. Taylor & Francis 2021-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8231345/ /pubmed/33390057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1864124 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Husum, Hans-Christen Hellfritzsch, Michel Bach Henriksen, Mads Duch, Kirsten Skjaerbaek Gottliebsen, Martin Rahbek, Ole What is the association between MRI and conventional radiography in measuring femoral head migration? |
title | What is the association between MRI and conventional radiography in measuring femoral head migration? |
title_full | What is the association between MRI and conventional radiography in measuring femoral head migration? |
title_fullStr | What is the association between MRI and conventional radiography in measuring femoral head migration? |
title_full_unstemmed | What is the association between MRI and conventional radiography in measuring femoral head migration? |
title_short | What is the association between MRI and conventional radiography in measuring femoral head migration? |
title_sort | what is the association between mri and conventional radiography in measuring femoral head migration? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33390057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1864124 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT husumhanschristen whatistheassociationbetweenmriandconventionalradiographyinmeasuringfemoralheadmigration AT hellfritzschmichelbach whatistheassociationbetweenmriandconventionalradiographyinmeasuringfemoralheadmigration AT henriksenmads whatistheassociationbetweenmriandconventionalradiographyinmeasuringfemoralheadmigration AT duchkirstenskjaerbaek whatistheassociationbetweenmriandconventionalradiographyinmeasuringfemoralheadmigration AT gottliebsenmartin whatistheassociationbetweenmriandconventionalradiographyinmeasuringfemoralheadmigration AT rahbekole whatistheassociationbetweenmriandconventionalradiographyinmeasuringfemoralheadmigration |