Cargando…
Evaluation is Key: Providing Appropriate Evaluation Measures for Participatory and User-Centred Design Processes of Healthcare IT
INTRODUCTION: The increasing availability of healthcare IT has the potential to improve the integration of health services. Existing projects developing healthcare IT mostly disregard the potential and importance of incorporating user feedback and proper evaluation measures to gain user feedback thr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ubiquity Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34220388 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5529 |
_version_ | 1783713429097283584 |
---|---|
author | Harst, Lorenz Wollschlaeger, Bastian Birnstein, Jule Fuchs, Tina Timpel, Patrick |
author_facet | Harst, Lorenz Wollschlaeger, Bastian Birnstein, Jule Fuchs, Tina Timpel, Patrick |
author_sort | Harst, Lorenz |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The increasing availability of healthcare IT has the potential to improve the integration of health services. Existing projects developing healthcare IT mostly disregard the potential and importance of incorporating user feedback and proper evaluation measures to gain user feedback throughout the development process. We therefore provide methodological guidance for evaluation in a stepwise user-centred design process. METHODS: Based on a literature review we propose adequate methods for data collection in each phase of participatory and user-centred healthcare IT development. In order to provide an orientation within the plethora of development processes used in practice, we consolidate a generic blueprint process from the literature review. The applicability of our methodological guidance is shown in three diverse use cases from the field of integrated care. RESULTS: From 14 literature items, we identified common evaluation methods including, among others, interviews, focus groups, and surveys. These methods can be associated to six typical development phases that could be derived from research: State of the Art Research, Requirement Analysis, Conceptual Prototype, Preliminary Prototype, Full Prototype, Full Application. The use cases demonstrate the value of qualitative methods and mixed methods designs. DISCUSSION: Our methodological guidance has proven applicable for designing healthcare IT solutions from scratch – both for patient and professional settings – and to develop a platform for combining existing component-based solutions. In integrated care settings, where a wide range of stakeholders with multiple needs exist, we thus provide methodological guidance on how to involve users in the development process. CONCLUSION: Our stepwise methodological guidance helps to design and properly evaluate healthcare IT solutions, which meet the user needs and requirements, for integrated care settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8231460 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Ubiquity Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82314602021-07-01 Evaluation is Key: Providing Appropriate Evaluation Measures for Participatory and User-Centred Design Processes of Healthcare IT Harst, Lorenz Wollschlaeger, Bastian Birnstein, Jule Fuchs, Tina Timpel, Patrick Int J Integr Care Research and Theory INTRODUCTION: The increasing availability of healthcare IT has the potential to improve the integration of health services. Existing projects developing healthcare IT mostly disregard the potential and importance of incorporating user feedback and proper evaluation measures to gain user feedback throughout the development process. We therefore provide methodological guidance for evaluation in a stepwise user-centred design process. METHODS: Based on a literature review we propose adequate methods for data collection in each phase of participatory and user-centred healthcare IT development. In order to provide an orientation within the plethora of development processes used in practice, we consolidate a generic blueprint process from the literature review. The applicability of our methodological guidance is shown in three diverse use cases from the field of integrated care. RESULTS: From 14 literature items, we identified common evaluation methods including, among others, interviews, focus groups, and surveys. These methods can be associated to six typical development phases that could be derived from research: State of the Art Research, Requirement Analysis, Conceptual Prototype, Preliminary Prototype, Full Prototype, Full Application. The use cases demonstrate the value of qualitative methods and mixed methods designs. DISCUSSION: Our methodological guidance has proven applicable for designing healthcare IT solutions from scratch – both for patient and professional settings – and to develop a platform for combining existing component-based solutions. In integrated care settings, where a wide range of stakeholders with multiple needs exist, we thus provide methodological guidance on how to involve users in the development process. CONCLUSION: Our stepwise methodological guidance helps to design and properly evaluate healthcare IT solutions, which meet the user needs and requirements, for integrated care settings. Ubiquity Press 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8231460/ /pubmed/34220388 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5529 Text en Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research and Theory Harst, Lorenz Wollschlaeger, Bastian Birnstein, Jule Fuchs, Tina Timpel, Patrick Evaluation is Key: Providing Appropriate Evaluation Measures for Participatory and User-Centred Design Processes of Healthcare IT |
title | Evaluation is Key: Providing Appropriate Evaluation Measures for Participatory and User-Centred Design Processes of Healthcare IT |
title_full | Evaluation is Key: Providing Appropriate Evaluation Measures for Participatory and User-Centred Design Processes of Healthcare IT |
title_fullStr | Evaluation is Key: Providing Appropriate Evaluation Measures for Participatory and User-Centred Design Processes of Healthcare IT |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation is Key: Providing Appropriate Evaluation Measures for Participatory and User-Centred Design Processes of Healthcare IT |
title_short | Evaluation is Key: Providing Appropriate Evaluation Measures for Participatory and User-Centred Design Processes of Healthcare IT |
title_sort | evaluation is key: providing appropriate evaluation measures for participatory and user-centred design processes of healthcare it |
topic | Research and Theory |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34220388 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5529 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harstlorenz evaluationiskeyprovidingappropriateevaluationmeasuresforparticipatoryandusercentreddesignprocessesofhealthcareit AT wollschlaegerbastian evaluationiskeyprovidingappropriateevaluationmeasuresforparticipatoryandusercentreddesignprocessesofhealthcareit AT birnsteinjule evaluationiskeyprovidingappropriateevaluationmeasuresforparticipatoryandusercentreddesignprocessesofhealthcareit AT fuchstina evaluationiskeyprovidingappropriateevaluationmeasuresforparticipatoryandusercentreddesignprocessesofhealthcareit AT timpelpatrick evaluationiskeyprovidingappropriateevaluationmeasuresforparticipatoryandusercentreddesignprocessesofhealthcareit |