Cargando…

Evaluation is Key: Providing Appropriate Evaluation Measures for Participatory and User-Centred Design Processes of Healthcare IT

INTRODUCTION: The increasing availability of healthcare IT has the potential to improve the integration of health services. Existing projects developing healthcare IT mostly disregard the potential and importance of incorporating user feedback and proper evaluation measures to gain user feedback thr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harst, Lorenz, Wollschlaeger, Bastian, Birnstein, Jule, Fuchs, Tina, Timpel, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34220388
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5529
_version_ 1783713429097283584
author Harst, Lorenz
Wollschlaeger, Bastian
Birnstein, Jule
Fuchs, Tina
Timpel, Patrick
author_facet Harst, Lorenz
Wollschlaeger, Bastian
Birnstein, Jule
Fuchs, Tina
Timpel, Patrick
author_sort Harst, Lorenz
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The increasing availability of healthcare IT has the potential to improve the integration of health services. Existing projects developing healthcare IT mostly disregard the potential and importance of incorporating user feedback and proper evaluation measures to gain user feedback throughout the development process. We therefore provide methodological guidance for evaluation in a stepwise user-centred design process. METHODS: Based on a literature review we propose adequate methods for data collection in each phase of participatory and user-centred healthcare IT development. In order to provide an orientation within the plethora of development processes used in practice, we consolidate a generic blueprint process from the literature review. The applicability of our methodological guidance is shown in three diverse use cases from the field of integrated care. RESULTS: From 14 literature items, we identified common evaluation methods including, among others, interviews, focus groups, and surveys. These methods can be associated to six typical development phases that could be derived from research: State of the Art Research, Requirement Analysis, Conceptual Prototype, Preliminary Prototype, Full Prototype, Full Application. The use cases demonstrate the value of qualitative methods and mixed methods designs. DISCUSSION: Our methodological guidance has proven applicable for designing healthcare IT solutions from scratch – both for patient and professional settings – and to develop a platform for combining existing component-based solutions. In integrated care settings, where a wide range of stakeholders with multiple needs exist, we thus provide methodological guidance on how to involve users in the development process. CONCLUSION: Our stepwise methodological guidance helps to design and properly evaluate healthcare IT solutions, which meet the user needs and requirements, for integrated care settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8231460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82314602021-07-01 Evaluation is Key: Providing Appropriate Evaluation Measures for Participatory and User-Centred Design Processes of Healthcare IT Harst, Lorenz Wollschlaeger, Bastian Birnstein, Jule Fuchs, Tina Timpel, Patrick Int J Integr Care Research and Theory INTRODUCTION: The increasing availability of healthcare IT has the potential to improve the integration of health services. Existing projects developing healthcare IT mostly disregard the potential and importance of incorporating user feedback and proper evaluation measures to gain user feedback throughout the development process. We therefore provide methodological guidance for evaluation in a stepwise user-centred design process. METHODS: Based on a literature review we propose adequate methods for data collection in each phase of participatory and user-centred healthcare IT development. In order to provide an orientation within the plethora of development processes used in practice, we consolidate a generic blueprint process from the literature review. The applicability of our methodological guidance is shown in three diverse use cases from the field of integrated care. RESULTS: From 14 literature items, we identified common evaluation methods including, among others, interviews, focus groups, and surveys. These methods can be associated to six typical development phases that could be derived from research: State of the Art Research, Requirement Analysis, Conceptual Prototype, Preliminary Prototype, Full Prototype, Full Application. The use cases demonstrate the value of qualitative methods and mixed methods designs. DISCUSSION: Our methodological guidance has proven applicable for designing healthcare IT solutions from scratch – both for patient and professional settings – and to develop a platform for combining existing component-based solutions. In integrated care settings, where a wide range of stakeholders with multiple needs exist, we thus provide methodological guidance on how to involve users in the development process. CONCLUSION: Our stepwise methodological guidance helps to design and properly evaluate healthcare IT solutions, which meet the user needs and requirements, for integrated care settings. Ubiquity Press 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8231460/ /pubmed/34220388 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5529 Text en Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research and Theory
Harst, Lorenz
Wollschlaeger, Bastian
Birnstein, Jule
Fuchs, Tina
Timpel, Patrick
Evaluation is Key: Providing Appropriate Evaluation Measures for Participatory and User-Centred Design Processes of Healthcare IT
title Evaluation is Key: Providing Appropriate Evaluation Measures for Participatory and User-Centred Design Processes of Healthcare IT
title_full Evaluation is Key: Providing Appropriate Evaluation Measures for Participatory and User-Centred Design Processes of Healthcare IT
title_fullStr Evaluation is Key: Providing Appropriate Evaluation Measures for Participatory and User-Centred Design Processes of Healthcare IT
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation is Key: Providing Appropriate Evaluation Measures for Participatory and User-Centred Design Processes of Healthcare IT
title_short Evaluation is Key: Providing Appropriate Evaluation Measures for Participatory and User-Centred Design Processes of Healthcare IT
title_sort evaluation is key: providing appropriate evaluation measures for participatory and user-centred design processes of healthcare it
topic Research and Theory
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34220388
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5529
work_keys_str_mv AT harstlorenz evaluationiskeyprovidingappropriateevaluationmeasuresforparticipatoryandusercentreddesignprocessesofhealthcareit
AT wollschlaegerbastian evaluationiskeyprovidingappropriateevaluationmeasuresforparticipatoryandusercentreddesignprocessesofhealthcareit
AT birnsteinjule evaluationiskeyprovidingappropriateevaluationmeasuresforparticipatoryandusercentreddesignprocessesofhealthcareit
AT fuchstina evaluationiskeyprovidingappropriateevaluationmeasuresforparticipatoryandusercentreddesignprocessesofhealthcareit
AT timpelpatrick evaluationiskeyprovidingappropriateevaluationmeasuresforparticipatoryandusercentreddesignprocessesofhealthcareit