Cargando…
Serological Evidence of Exposure to Spotted Fever Group and Typhus Group Rickettsiae in Australian Wildlife Rehabilitators
Rickettsioses are arthropod-borne zoonotic diseases, several of which occur in Australia. This study aimed to assess the exposure levels and risk factors for Rickettsia spp. among Australian wildlife rehabilitators (AWRs) using serology, PCR and a questionnaire. Antibody titres against Spotted Fever...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34204809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060745 |
_version_ | 1783713442376450048 |
---|---|
author | Mathews, Karen O. Phalen, David Norris, Jacqueline M. Stenos, John Toribio, Jenny-Ann Wood, Nicholas Graves, Stephen Sheehy, Paul A. Nguyen, Chelsea Bosward, Katrina L. |
author_facet | Mathews, Karen O. Phalen, David Norris, Jacqueline M. Stenos, John Toribio, Jenny-Ann Wood, Nicholas Graves, Stephen Sheehy, Paul A. Nguyen, Chelsea Bosward, Katrina L. |
author_sort | Mathews, Karen O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rickettsioses are arthropod-borne zoonotic diseases, several of which occur in Australia. This study aimed to assess the exposure levels and risk factors for Rickettsia spp. among Australian wildlife rehabilitators (AWRs) using serology, PCR and a questionnaire. Antibody titres against Spotted Fever Group (SFG), Typhus Group (TG) and Scrub Typhus Group (STG) antigens were determined using an immunofluorescence assay. PCR targeting the gltA gene was performed on DNA extracts from whole blood and serum. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with seropositivity. Of the 27 (22.1%; 27/122) seropositive participants all were seropositive for SFG, with 5/27 (4.1%) also positive for TG. Of the 27 positive sera, 14.8% (4/27) were further classified as exposure to R. australis, 3.7% (1/27) to R. honei, 3.7% (1/27) to R. felis and 77.8% (21/27) were classified as ‘indeterminate’—most of which (85.7%; 18/21) were indeterminate R. australis/R. honei exposures. Rickettsia DNA was not detected in whole blood or serum. Rehabilitators were more likely to be seropositive if more than one household member rehabilitated wildlife, were older than 50 years or had occupational animal contact. These findings suggest that AWRs are at increased risk of contracting Rickettsia-related illnesses, however the source of the increased seropositivity remains unclear. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8231516 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82315162021-06-26 Serological Evidence of Exposure to Spotted Fever Group and Typhus Group Rickettsiae in Australian Wildlife Rehabilitators Mathews, Karen O. Phalen, David Norris, Jacqueline M. Stenos, John Toribio, Jenny-Ann Wood, Nicholas Graves, Stephen Sheehy, Paul A. Nguyen, Chelsea Bosward, Katrina L. Pathogens Article Rickettsioses are arthropod-borne zoonotic diseases, several of which occur in Australia. This study aimed to assess the exposure levels and risk factors for Rickettsia spp. among Australian wildlife rehabilitators (AWRs) using serology, PCR and a questionnaire. Antibody titres against Spotted Fever Group (SFG), Typhus Group (TG) and Scrub Typhus Group (STG) antigens were determined using an immunofluorescence assay. PCR targeting the gltA gene was performed on DNA extracts from whole blood and serum. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with seropositivity. Of the 27 (22.1%; 27/122) seropositive participants all were seropositive for SFG, with 5/27 (4.1%) also positive for TG. Of the 27 positive sera, 14.8% (4/27) were further classified as exposure to R. australis, 3.7% (1/27) to R. honei, 3.7% (1/27) to R. felis and 77.8% (21/27) were classified as ‘indeterminate’—most of which (85.7%; 18/21) were indeterminate R. australis/R. honei exposures. Rickettsia DNA was not detected in whole blood or serum. Rehabilitators were more likely to be seropositive if more than one household member rehabilitated wildlife, were older than 50 years or had occupational animal contact. These findings suggest that AWRs are at increased risk of contracting Rickettsia-related illnesses, however the source of the increased seropositivity remains unclear. MDPI 2021-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8231516/ /pubmed/34204809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060745 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mathews, Karen O. Phalen, David Norris, Jacqueline M. Stenos, John Toribio, Jenny-Ann Wood, Nicholas Graves, Stephen Sheehy, Paul A. Nguyen, Chelsea Bosward, Katrina L. Serological Evidence of Exposure to Spotted Fever Group and Typhus Group Rickettsiae in Australian Wildlife Rehabilitators |
title | Serological Evidence of Exposure to Spotted Fever Group and Typhus Group Rickettsiae in Australian Wildlife Rehabilitators |
title_full | Serological Evidence of Exposure to Spotted Fever Group and Typhus Group Rickettsiae in Australian Wildlife Rehabilitators |
title_fullStr | Serological Evidence of Exposure to Spotted Fever Group and Typhus Group Rickettsiae in Australian Wildlife Rehabilitators |
title_full_unstemmed | Serological Evidence of Exposure to Spotted Fever Group and Typhus Group Rickettsiae in Australian Wildlife Rehabilitators |
title_short | Serological Evidence of Exposure to Spotted Fever Group and Typhus Group Rickettsiae in Australian Wildlife Rehabilitators |
title_sort | serological evidence of exposure to spotted fever group and typhus group rickettsiae in australian wildlife rehabilitators |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34204809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060745 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mathewskareno serologicalevidenceofexposuretospottedfevergroupandtyphusgrouprickettsiaeinaustralianwildliferehabilitators AT phalendavid serologicalevidenceofexposuretospottedfevergroupandtyphusgrouprickettsiaeinaustralianwildliferehabilitators AT norrisjacquelinem serologicalevidenceofexposuretospottedfevergroupandtyphusgrouprickettsiaeinaustralianwildliferehabilitators AT stenosjohn serologicalevidenceofexposuretospottedfevergroupandtyphusgrouprickettsiaeinaustralianwildliferehabilitators AT toribiojennyann serologicalevidenceofexposuretospottedfevergroupandtyphusgrouprickettsiaeinaustralianwildliferehabilitators AT woodnicholas serologicalevidenceofexposuretospottedfevergroupandtyphusgrouprickettsiaeinaustralianwildliferehabilitators AT gravesstephen serologicalevidenceofexposuretospottedfevergroupandtyphusgrouprickettsiaeinaustralianwildliferehabilitators AT sheehypaula serologicalevidenceofexposuretospottedfevergroupandtyphusgrouprickettsiaeinaustralianwildliferehabilitators AT nguyenchelsea serologicalevidenceofexposuretospottedfevergroupandtyphusgrouprickettsiaeinaustralianwildliferehabilitators AT boswardkatrinal serologicalevidenceofexposuretospottedfevergroupandtyphusgrouprickettsiaeinaustralianwildliferehabilitators |