Cargando…

Serological Evidence of Exposure to Spotted Fever Group and Typhus Group Rickettsiae in Australian Wildlife Rehabilitators

Rickettsioses are arthropod-borne zoonotic diseases, several of which occur in Australia. This study aimed to assess the exposure levels and risk factors for Rickettsia spp. among Australian wildlife rehabilitators (AWRs) using serology, PCR and a questionnaire. Antibody titres against Spotted Fever...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mathews, Karen O., Phalen, David, Norris, Jacqueline M., Stenos, John, Toribio, Jenny-Ann, Wood, Nicholas, Graves, Stephen, Sheehy, Paul A., Nguyen, Chelsea, Bosward, Katrina L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34204809
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060745
_version_ 1783713442376450048
author Mathews, Karen O.
Phalen, David
Norris, Jacqueline M.
Stenos, John
Toribio, Jenny-Ann
Wood, Nicholas
Graves, Stephen
Sheehy, Paul A.
Nguyen, Chelsea
Bosward, Katrina L.
author_facet Mathews, Karen O.
Phalen, David
Norris, Jacqueline M.
Stenos, John
Toribio, Jenny-Ann
Wood, Nicholas
Graves, Stephen
Sheehy, Paul A.
Nguyen, Chelsea
Bosward, Katrina L.
author_sort Mathews, Karen O.
collection PubMed
description Rickettsioses are arthropod-borne zoonotic diseases, several of which occur in Australia. This study aimed to assess the exposure levels and risk factors for Rickettsia spp. among Australian wildlife rehabilitators (AWRs) using serology, PCR and a questionnaire. Antibody titres against Spotted Fever Group (SFG), Typhus Group (TG) and Scrub Typhus Group (STG) antigens were determined using an immunofluorescence assay. PCR targeting the gltA gene was performed on DNA extracts from whole blood and serum. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with seropositivity. Of the 27 (22.1%; 27/122) seropositive participants all were seropositive for SFG, with 5/27 (4.1%) also positive for TG. Of the 27 positive sera, 14.8% (4/27) were further classified as exposure to R. australis, 3.7% (1/27) to R. honei, 3.7% (1/27) to R. felis and 77.8% (21/27) were classified as ‘indeterminate’—most of which (85.7%; 18/21) were indeterminate R. australis/R. honei exposures. Rickettsia DNA was not detected in whole blood or serum. Rehabilitators were more likely to be seropositive if more than one household member rehabilitated wildlife, were older than 50 years or had occupational animal contact. These findings suggest that AWRs are at increased risk of contracting Rickettsia-related illnesses, however the source of the increased seropositivity remains unclear.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8231516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82315162021-06-26 Serological Evidence of Exposure to Spotted Fever Group and Typhus Group Rickettsiae in Australian Wildlife Rehabilitators Mathews, Karen O. Phalen, David Norris, Jacqueline M. Stenos, John Toribio, Jenny-Ann Wood, Nicholas Graves, Stephen Sheehy, Paul A. Nguyen, Chelsea Bosward, Katrina L. Pathogens Article Rickettsioses are arthropod-borne zoonotic diseases, several of which occur in Australia. This study aimed to assess the exposure levels and risk factors for Rickettsia spp. among Australian wildlife rehabilitators (AWRs) using serology, PCR and a questionnaire. Antibody titres against Spotted Fever Group (SFG), Typhus Group (TG) and Scrub Typhus Group (STG) antigens were determined using an immunofluorescence assay. PCR targeting the gltA gene was performed on DNA extracts from whole blood and serum. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with seropositivity. Of the 27 (22.1%; 27/122) seropositive participants all were seropositive for SFG, with 5/27 (4.1%) also positive for TG. Of the 27 positive sera, 14.8% (4/27) were further classified as exposure to R. australis, 3.7% (1/27) to R. honei, 3.7% (1/27) to R. felis and 77.8% (21/27) were classified as ‘indeterminate’—most of which (85.7%; 18/21) were indeterminate R. australis/R. honei exposures. Rickettsia DNA was not detected in whole blood or serum. Rehabilitators were more likely to be seropositive if more than one household member rehabilitated wildlife, were older than 50 years or had occupational animal contact. These findings suggest that AWRs are at increased risk of contracting Rickettsia-related illnesses, however the source of the increased seropositivity remains unclear. MDPI 2021-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8231516/ /pubmed/34204809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060745 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mathews, Karen O.
Phalen, David
Norris, Jacqueline M.
Stenos, John
Toribio, Jenny-Ann
Wood, Nicholas
Graves, Stephen
Sheehy, Paul A.
Nguyen, Chelsea
Bosward, Katrina L.
Serological Evidence of Exposure to Spotted Fever Group and Typhus Group Rickettsiae in Australian Wildlife Rehabilitators
title Serological Evidence of Exposure to Spotted Fever Group and Typhus Group Rickettsiae in Australian Wildlife Rehabilitators
title_full Serological Evidence of Exposure to Spotted Fever Group and Typhus Group Rickettsiae in Australian Wildlife Rehabilitators
title_fullStr Serological Evidence of Exposure to Spotted Fever Group and Typhus Group Rickettsiae in Australian Wildlife Rehabilitators
title_full_unstemmed Serological Evidence of Exposure to Spotted Fever Group and Typhus Group Rickettsiae in Australian Wildlife Rehabilitators
title_short Serological Evidence of Exposure to Spotted Fever Group and Typhus Group Rickettsiae in Australian Wildlife Rehabilitators
title_sort serological evidence of exposure to spotted fever group and typhus group rickettsiae in australian wildlife rehabilitators
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34204809
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060745
work_keys_str_mv AT mathewskareno serologicalevidenceofexposuretospottedfevergroupandtyphusgrouprickettsiaeinaustralianwildliferehabilitators
AT phalendavid serologicalevidenceofexposuretospottedfevergroupandtyphusgrouprickettsiaeinaustralianwildliferehabilitators
AT norrisjacquelinem serologicalevidenceofexposuretospottedfevergroupandtyphusgrouprickettsiaeinaustralianwildliferehabilitators
AT stenosjohn serologicalevidenceofexposuretospottedfevergroupandtyphusgrouprickettsiaeinaustralianwildliferehabilitators
AT toribiojennyann serologicalevidenceofexposuretospottedfevergroupandtyphusgrouprickettsiaeinaustralianwildliferehabilitators
AT woodnicholas serologicalevidenceofexposuretospottedfevergroupandtyphusgrouprickettsiaeinaustralianwildliferehabilitators
AT gravesstephen serologicalevidenceofexposuretospottedfevergroupandtyphusgrouprickettsiaeinaustralianwildliferehabilitators
AT sheehypaula serologicalevidenceofexposuretospottedfevergroupandtyphusgrouprickettsiaeinaustralianwildliferehabilitators
AT nguyenchelsea serologicalevidenceofexposuretospottedfevergroupandtyphusgrouprickettsiaeinaustralianwildliferehabilitators
AT boswardkatrinal serologicalevidenceofexposuretospottedfevergroupandtyphusgrouprickettsiaeinaustralianwildliferehabilitators