Cargando…
The probability of conditionals: A review
A major hypothesis about conditionals is the Equation in which the probability of a conditional equals the corresponding conditional probability: p(if A then C) = p(C|A). Probabilistic theories often treat it as axiomatic, whereas it follows from the meanings of conditionals in the theory of mental...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34173186 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-01938-5 |
_version_ | 1783713485829439488 |
---|---|
author | López-Astorga, Miguel Ragni, Marco Johnson-Laird, P. N. |
author_facet | López-Astorga, Miguel Ragni, Marco Johnson-Laird, P. N. |
author_sort | López-Astorga, Miguel |
collection | PubMed |
description | A major hypothesis about conditionals is the Equation in which the probability of a conditional equals the corresponding conditional probability: p(if A then C) = p(C|A). Probabilistic theories often treat it as axiomatic, whereas it follows from the meanings of conditionals in the theory of mental models. In this theory, intuitive models (system 1) do not represent what is false, and so produce errors in estimates of p(if A then C), yielding instead p(A & C). Deliberative models (system 2) are normative, and yield the proportion of cases of A in which C holds, i.e., the Equation. Intuitive estimates of the probability of a conditional about unique events: If covid-19 disappears in the USA, then Biden will run for a second term, together with those of each of its clauses, are liable to yield joint probability distributions that sum to over 100%. The error, which is inconsistent with the probability calculus, is massive when participants estimate the joint probabilities of conditionals with each of the different possibilities to which they refer. This result and others under review corroborate the model theory. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13423-021-01938-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8231749 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82317492021-06-28 The probability of conditionals: A review López-Astorga, Miguel Ragni, Marco Johnson-Laird, P. N. Psychon Bull Rev Theoretical/Review A major hypothesis about conditionals is the Equation in which the probability of a conditional equals the corresponding conditional probability: p(if A then C) = p(C|A). Probabilistic theories often treat it as axiomatic, whereas it follows from the meanings of conditionals in the theory of mental models. In this theory, intuitive models (system 1) do not represent what is false, and so produce errors in estimates of p(if A then C), yielding instead p(A & C). Deliberative models (system 2) are normative, and yield the proportion of cases of A in which C holds, i.e., the Equation. Intuitive estimates of the probability of a conditional about unique events: If covid-19 disappears in the USA, then Biden will run for a second term, together with those of each of its clauses, are liable to yield joint probability distributions that sum to over 100%. The error, which is inconsistent with the probability calculus, is massive when participants estimate the joint probabilities of conditionals with each of the different possibilities to which they refer. This result and others under review corroborate the model theory. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13423-021-01938-5. Springer US 2021-06-25 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8231749/ /pubmed/34173186 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-01938-5 Text en © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Theoretical/Review López-Astorga, Miguel Ragni, Marco Johnson-Laird, P. N. The probability of conditionals: A review |
title | The probability of conditionals: A review |
title_full | The probability of conditionals: A review |
title_fullStr | The probability of conditionals: A review |
title_full_unstemmed | The probability of conditionals: A review |
title_short | The probability of conditionals: A review |
title_sort | probability of conditionals: a review |
topic | Theoretical/Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34173186 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-01938-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lopezastorgamiguel theprobabilityofconditionalsareview AT ragnimarco theprobabilityofconditionalsareview AT johnsonlairdpn theprobabilityofconditionalsareview AT lopezastorgamiguel probabilityofconditionalsareview AT ragnimarco probabilityofconditionalsareview AT johnsonlairdpn probabilityofconditionalsareview |