Cargando…

Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization Following Curative-Intent Hepatectomy Versus Hepatectomy Alone for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The role of postoperative transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. We performed a systematic review of the literature and compared the survival outcomes of TACE vs. no TACE after liver resection for HCC. While th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Esagian, Stepan M., Kakos, Christos D., Giorgakis, Emmanouil, Burdine, Lyle, Barreto, J. Camilo, Mavros, Michail N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8232114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34203692
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13122984
_version_ 1783713566392582144
author Esagian, Stepan M.
Kakos, Christos D.
Giorgakis, Emmanouil
Burdine, Lyle
Barreto, J. Camilo
Mavros, Michail N.
author_facet Esagian, Stepan M.
Kakos, Christos D.
Giorgakis, Emmanouil
Burdine, Lyle
Barreto, J. Camilo
Mavros, Michail N.
author_sort Esagian, Stepan M.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: The role of postoperative transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. We performed a systematic review of the literature and compared the survival outcomes of TACE vs. no TACE after liver resection for HCC. While the existing evidence suggests a benefit of adjuvant TACE, published trials to date are at significant risk of bias and limited to Eastern Asian patients. High-quality randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm the oncologic benefits of adjuvant TACE. ABSTRACT: The role of adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing hepatectomy is currently unclear. We performed a systematic review of the literature using the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Random-effects meta-analysis was carried out to compare the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with resectable HCC undergoing hepatectomy followed by adjuvant TACE vs. hepatectomy alone in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Meta-regression analyses were performed to explore the effect of hepatitis B viral status, microvascular invasion, type of resection (anatomic vs. parenchymal-sparing), and tumor size on the outcomes. Ten eligible RCTs, reporting on 1216 patients in total, were identified. The combination of hepatectomy and adjuvant TACE was associated with superior OS (hazard ratio (HR): 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52 to 0.85; p < 0.001) and RFS (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56 to 0.88; p < 0.001) compared to hepatectomy alone. There were significant concerns regarding the risk of bias in most of the included studies. Overall, adjuvant TACE may be associated with an oncologic benefit in select HCC patients. However, the applicability of these findings may be limited to Eastern Asian populations, due to the geographically restricted sample. High-quality multinational RCTs, as well as predictive tools to optimize patient selection, are necessary before adjuvant TACE can be routinely implemented into standard practice. PROSPERO Registration ID: CRD42021245758.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8232114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82321142021-06-26 Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization Following Curative-Intent Hepatectomy Versus Hepatectomy Alone for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Esagian, Stepan M. Kakos, Christos D. Giorgakis, Emmanouil Burdine, Lyle Barreto, J. Camilo Mavros, Michail N. Cancers (Basel) Systematic Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: The role of postoperative transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. We performed a systematic review of the literature and compared the survival outcomes of TACE vs. no TACE after liver resection for HCC. While the existing evidence suggests a benefit of adjuvant TACE, published trials to date are at significant risk of bias and limited to Eastern Asian patients. High-quality randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm the oncologic benefits of adjuvant TACE. ABSTRACT: The role of adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing hepatectomy is currently unclear. We performed a systematic review of the literature using the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Random-effects meta-analysis was carried out to compare the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with resectable HCC undergoing hepatectomy followed by adjuvant TACE vs. hepatectomy alone in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Meta-regression analyses were performed to explore the effect of hepatitis B viral status, microvascular invasion, type of resection (anatomic vs. parenchymal-sparing), and tumor size on the outcomes. Ten eligible RCTs, reporting on 1216 patients in total, were identified. The combination of hepatectomy and adjuvant TACE was associated with superior OS (hazard ratio (HR): 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52 to 0.85; p < 0.001) and RFS (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56 to 0.88; p < 0.001) compared to hepatectomy alone. There were significant concerns regarding the risk of bias in most of the included studies. Overall, adjuvant TACE may be associated with an oncologic benefit in select HCC patients. However, the applicability of these findings may be limited to Eastern Asian populations, due to the geographically restricted sample. High-quality multinational RCTs, as well as predictive tools to optimize patient selection, are necessary before adjuvant TACE can be routinely implemented into standard practice. PROSPERO Registration ID: CRD42021245758. MDPI 2021-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8232114/ /pubmed/34203692 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13122984 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Esagian, Stepan M.
Kakos, Christos D.
Giorgakis, Emmanouil
Burdine, Lyle
Barreto, J. Camilo
Mavros, Michail N.
Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization Following Curative-Intent Hepatectomy Versus Hepatectomy Alone for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization Following Curative-Intent Hepatectomy Versus Hepatectomy Alone for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization Following Curative-Intent Hepatectomy Versus Hepatectomy Alone for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization Following Curative-Intent Hepatectomy Versus Hepatectomy Alone for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization Following Curative-Intent Hepatectomy Versus Hepatectomy Alone for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization Following Curative-Intent Hepatectomy Versus Hepatectomy Alone for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization following curative-intent hepatectomy versus hepatectomy alone for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8232114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34203692
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13122984
work_keys_str_mv AT esagianstepanm adjuvanttransarterialchemoembolizationfollowingcurativeintenthepatectomyversushepatectomyaloneforhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT kakoschristosd adjuvanttransarterialchemoembolizationfollowingcurativeintenthepatectomyversushepatectomyaloneforhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT giorgakisemmanouil adjuvanttransarterialchemoembolizationfollowingcurativeintenthepatectomyversushepatectomyaloneforhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT burdinelyle adjuvanttransarterialchemoembolizationfollowingcurativeintenthepatectomyversushepatectomyaloneforhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT barretojcamilo adjuvanttransarterialchemoembolizationfollowingcurativeintenthepatectomyversushepatectomyaloneforhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT mavrosmichailn adjuvanttransarterialchemoembolizationfollowingcurativeintenthepatectomyversushepatectomyaloneforhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials