Cargando…

Daptomycin versus Glycopeptides for the Treatment of Enterococcus faecium Bacteraemia: A Cohort Study

Background: Ampicillin resistant and glycopeptide susceptible Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infection (GSEF-BSI) incidence has risen. However, the treatment of choice remains unknown. Daptomycin use for the treatment of enterococcal infections has increased, despite effectiveness and safety conce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Echeverría-Esnal, Daniel, Sorli, Luisa, Prim, Nuria, Martin-Ontiyuelo, Clara, Horcajada, Juan Pablo, Grau, Santiago
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8232223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34198646
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060716
_version_ 1783713591268999168
author Echeverría-Esnal, Daniel
Sorli, Luisa
Prim, Nuria
Martin-Ontiyuelo, Clara
Horcajada, Juan Pablo
Grau, Santiago
author_facet Echeverría-Esnal, Daniel
Sorli, Luisa
Prim, Nuria
Martin-Ontiyuelo, Clara
Horcajada, Juan Pablo
Grau, Santiago
author_sort Echeverría-Esnal, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Background: Ampicillin resistant and glycopeptide susceptible Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infection (GSEF-BSI) incidence has risen. However, the treatment of choice remains unknown. Daptomycin use for the treatment of enterococcal infections has increased, despite effectiveness and safety concerns. The objective was to compare the effectiveness and safety of daptomycin and glycopeptides in the treatment of GSEF-BSI. Methods: This was a single-centre, retrospective observational cohort study performed at Hospital del Mar (Barcelona, Spain), from January 2006–May 2018. The primary outcome was clinical cure at the end of the therapy, and secondary outcomes included 14-day, 30-day, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay. Results: From a total of 192 patients with GSEF-BSI, 54 (28.1%) were treated with glycopeptides and 17 (8.9%) with daptomycin. Patients treated with daptomycin presented a lower clinical cure than patients treated with glycopeptides (58.8% vs. 83.3%, RR 0.416 (95% CI 0.189–0.915)). After controlling for confounding variables by means of multivariate analysis the significative difference was confirmed (aOR 4.313, 95% CI, 1.053–17.660). The need for treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was similar. Conclusions: Patients with GSEF-BSI treated with glycopeptides showed a higher clinical cure than those treated with daptomycin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8232223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82322232021-06-26 Daptomycin versus Glycopeptides for the Treatment of Enterococcus faecium Bacteraemia: A Cohort Study Echeverría-Esnal, Daniel Sorli, Luisa Prim, Nuria Martin-Ontiyuelo, Clara Horcajada, Juan Pablo Grau, Santiago Antibiotics (Basel) Article Background: Ampicillin resistant and glycopeptide susceptible Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infection (GSEF-BSI) incidence has risen. However, the treatment of choice remains unknown. Daptomycin use for the treatment of enterococcal infections has increased, despite effectiveness and safety concerns. The objective was to compare the effectiveness and safety of daptomycin and glycopeptides in the treatment of GSEF-BSI. Methods: This was a single-centre, retrospective observational cohort study performed at Hospital del Mar (Barcelona, Spain), from January 2006–May 2018. The primary outcome was clinical cure at the end of the therapy, and secondary outcomes included 14-day, 30-day, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay. Results: From a total of 192 patients with GSEF-BSI, 54 (28.1%) were treated with glycopeptides and 17 (8.9%) with daptomycin. Patients treated with daptomycin presented a lower clinical cure than patients treated with glycopeptides (58.8% vs. 83.3%, RR 0.416 (95% CI 0.189–0.915)). After controlling for confounding variables by means of multivariate analysis the significative difference was confirmed (aOR 4.313, 95% CI, 1.053–17.660). The need for treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was similar. Conclusions: Patients with GSEF-BSI treated with glycopeptides showed a higher clinical cure than those treated with daptomycin. MDPI 2021-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8232223/ /pubmed/34198646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060716 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Echeverría-Esnal, Daniel
Sorli, Luisa
Prim, Nuria
Martin-Ontiyuelo, Clara
Horcajada, Juan Pablo
Grau, Santiago
Daptomycin versus Glycopeptides for the Treatment of Enterococcus faecium Bacteraemia: A Cohort Study
title Daptomycin versus Glycopeptides for the Treatment of Enterococcus faecium Bacteraemia: A Cohort Study
title_full Daptomycin versus Glycopeptides for the Treatment of Enterococcus faecium Bacteraemia: A Cohort Study
title_fullStr Daptomycin versus Glycopeptides for the Treatment of Enterococcus faecium Bacteraemia: A Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Daptomycin versus Glycopeptides for the Treatment of Enterococcus faecium Bacteraemia: A Cohort Study
title_short Daptomycin versus Glycopeptides for the Treatment of Enterococcus faecium Bacteraemia: A Cohort Study
title_sort daptomycin versus glycopeptides for the treatment of enterococcus faecium bacteraemia: a cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8232223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34198646
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060716
work_keys_str_mv AT echeverriaesnaldaniel daptomycinversusglycopeptidesforthetreatmentofenterococcusfaeciumbacteraemiaacohortstudy
AT sorliluisa daptomycinversusglycopeptidesforthetreatmentofenterococcusfaeciumbacteraemiaacohortstudy
AT primnuria daptomycinversusglycopeptidesforthetreatmentofenterococcusfaeciumbacteraemiaacohortstudy
AT martinontiyueloclara daptomycinversusglycopeptidesforthetreatmentofenterococcusfaeciumbacteraemiaacohortstudy
AT horcajadajuanpablo daptomycinversusglycopeptidesforthetreatmentofenterococcusfaeciumbacteraemiaacohortstudy
AT grausantiago daptomycinversusglycopeptidesforthetreatmentofenterococcusfaeciumbacteraemiaacohortstudy