Cargando…

A Comparison of Vaccine Hesitancy of COVID-19 Vaccination in China and the United States

Objectives: To investigate the differences in vaccine hesitancy and preference of the currently available COVID-19 vaccines between two countries, namely, China and the United States (U.S.). Method: A cross-national survey was conducted in both China and the United States, and discrete choice experi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Taoran, He, Zonglin, Huang, Jian, Yan, Ni, Chen, Qian, Huang, Fengqiu, Zhang, Yuejia, Akinwunmi, Omolola M., Akinwunmi, Babatunde O., Zhang, Casper J. P., Wu, Yibo, Ming, Wai-Kit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8232230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34198716
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060649
_version_ 1783713592953012224
author Liu, Taoran
He, Zonglin
Huang, Jian
Yan, Ni
Chen, Qian
Huang, Fengqiu
Zhang, Yuejia
Akinwunmi, Omolola M.
Akinwunmi, Babatunde O.
Zhang, Casper J. P.
Wu, Yibo
Ming, Wai-Kit
author_facet Liu, Taoran
He, Zonglin
Huang, Jian
Yan, Ni
Chen, Qian
Huang, Fengqiu
Zhang, Yuejia
Akinwunmi, Omolola M.
Akinwunmi, Babatunde O.
Zhang, Casper J. P.
Wu, Yibo
Ming, Wai-Kit
author_sort Liu, Taoran
collection PubMed
description Objectives: To investigate the differences in vaccine hesitancy and preference of the currently available COVID-19 vaccines between two countries, namely, China and the United States (U.S.). Method: A cross-national survey was conducted in both China and the United States, and discrete choice experiments, as well as Likert scales, were utilized to assess vaccine preference and the underlying factors contributing to vaccination acceptance. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to enable a direct comparison between the two countries. Results: A total of 9077 (5375 and 3702 from China and the United States, respectively) respondents completed the survey. After propensity score matching, over 82.0% of respondents from China positively accepted the COVID-19 vaccination, while 72.2% of respondents from the United States positively accepted it. Specifically, only 31.9% of Chinese respondents were recommended by a doctor to have COVID-19 vaccination, while more than half of the U.S. respondents were recommended by a doctor (50.2%), local health board (59.4%), or friends and families (64.8%). The discrete choice experiments revealed that respondents from the United States attached the greatest importance to the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines (44.41%), followed by the cost of vaccination (29.57%), whereas those from China held a different viewpoint, that the cost of vaccination covered the largest proportion in their trade-off (30.66%), and efficacy ranked as the second most important attribute (26.34%). Additionally, respondents from China tended to be much more concerned about the adverse effect of vaccination (19.68% vs. 6.12%) and have a lower perceived severity of being infected with COVID-19. Conclusion: Although the overall acceptance and hesitancy of COVID-19 vaccination in both countries are high, underpinned distinctions between these countries were observed. Owing to the differences in COVID-19 incidence rates, cultural backgrounds, and the availability of specific COVID-19 vaccines in the two countries, vaccine rollout strategies should be nation-dependent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8232230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82322302021-06-26 A Comparison of Vaccine Hesitancy of COVID-19 Vaccination in China and the United States Liu, Taoran He, Zonglin Huang, Jian Yan, Ni Chen, Qian Huang, Fengqiu Zhang, Yuejia Akinwunmi, Omolola M. Akinwunmi, Babatunde O. Zhang, Casper J. P. Wu, Yibo Ming, Wai-Kit Vaccines (Basel) Article Objectives: To investigate the differences in vaccine hesitancy and preference of the currently available COVID-19 vaccines between two countries, namely, China and the United States (U.S.). Method: A cross-national survey was conducted in both China and the United States, and discrete choice experiments, as well as Likert scales, were utilized to assess vaccine preference and the underlying factors contributing to vaccination acceptance. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to enable a direct comparison between the two countries. Results: A total of 9077 (5375 and 3702 from China and the United States, respectively) respondents completed the survey. After propensity score matching, over 82.0% of respondents from China positively accepted the COVID-19 vaccination, while 72.2% of respondents from the United States positively accepted it. Specifically, only 31.9% of Chinese respondents were recommended by a doctor to have COVID-19 vaccination, while more than half of the U.S. respondents were recommended by a doctor (50.2%), local health board (59.4%), or friends and families (64.8%). The discrete choice experiments revealed that respondents from the United States attached the greatest importance to the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines (44.41%), followed by the cost of vaccination (29.57%), whereas those from China held a different viewpoint, that the cost of vaccination covered the largest proportion in their trade-off (30.66%), and efficacy ranked as the second most important attribute (26.34%). Additionally, respondents from China tended to be much more concerned about the adverse effect of vaccination (19.68% vs. 6.12%) and have a lower perceived severity of being infected with COVID-19. Conclusion: Although the overall acceptance and hesitancy of COVID-19 vaccination in both countries are high, underpinned distinctions between these countries were observed. Owing to the differences in COVID-19 incidence rates, cultural backgrounds, and the availability of specific COVID-19 vaccines in the two countries, vaccine rollout strategies should be nation-dependent. MDPI 2021-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8232230/ /pubmed/34198716 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060649 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Liu, Taoran
He, Zonglin
Huang, Jian
Yan, Ni
Chen, Qian
Huang, Fengqiu
Zhang, Yuejia
Akinwunmi, Omolola M.
Akinwunmi, Babatunde O.
Zhang, Casper J. P.
Wu, Yibo
Ming, Wai-Kit
A Comparison of Vaccine Hesitancy of COVID-19 Vaccination in China and the United States
title A Comparison of Vaccine Hesitancy of COVID-19 Vaccination in China and the United States
title_full A Comparison of Vaccine Hesitancy of COVID-19 Vaccination in China and the United States
title_fullStr A Comparison of Vaccine Hesitancy of COVID-19 Vaccination in China and the United States
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Vaccine Hesitancy of COVID-19 Vaccination in China and the United States
title_short A Comparison of Vaccine Hesitancy of COVID-19 Vaccination in China and the United States
title_sort comparison of vaccine hesitancy of covid-19 vaccination in china and the united states
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8232230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34198716
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060649
work_keys_str_mv AT liutaoran acomparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates
AT hezonglin acomparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates
AT huangjian acomparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates
AT yanni acomparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates
AT chenqian acomparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates
AT huangfengqiu acomparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates
AT zhangyuejia acomparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates
AT akinwunmiomololam acomparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates
AT akinwunmibabatundeo acomparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates
AT zhangcasperjp acomparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates
AT wuyibo acomparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates
AT mingwaikit acomparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates
AT liutaoran comparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates
AT hezonglin comparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates
AT huangjian comparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates
AT yanni comparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates
AT chenqian comparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates
AT huangfengqiu comparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates
AT zhangyuejia comparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates
AT akinwunmiomololam comparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates
AT akinwunmibabatundeo comparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates
AT zhangcasperjp comparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates
AT wuyibo comparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates
AT mingwaikit comparisonofvaccinehesitancyofcovid19vaccinationinchinaandtheunitedstates