Cargando…

Collision risk of bats with small wind turbines: Worst-case scenarios near roosts, commuting and hunting structures

Small wind turbines (SWTs) have become increasingly common within the last decade, but their impact on wildlife, especially bats, is largely unknown. We conducted an operational experiment by sequentially placing a mobile SWT with five different operational modes at six sites of high bat activity, i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hartmann, Stefanie A., Hochradel, Klaus, Greule, Sören, Günther, Felix, Luedtke, Bruntje, Schauer-Weisshahn, Horst, Brinkmann, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8232403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34170938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253782
_version_ 1783713628128542720
author Hartmann, Stefanie A.
Hochradel, Klaus
Greule, Sören
Günther, Felix
Luedtke, Bruntje
Schauer-Weisshahn, Horst
Brinkmann, Robert
author_facet Hartmann, Stefanie A.
Hochradel, Klaus
Greule, Sören
Günther, Felix
Luedtke, Bruntje
Schauer-Weisshahn, Horst
Brinkmann, Robert
author_sort Hartmann, Stefanie A.
collection PubMed
description Small wind turbines (SWTs) have become increasingly common within the last decade, but their impact on wildlife, especially bats, is largely unknown. We conducted an operational experiment by sequentially placing a mobile SWT with five different operational modes at six sites of high bat activity, including roosts, commuting structures, and highly frequented hunting areas. Bat flight trajectories around the SWT were documented at each site during five consecutive nights using a specifically designed high-spatial-resolution 3D camera. The recordings showed high bat activity levels close to the SWT (7,065 flight trajectories within a 10-m radius). The minimum distance to the rotor of each trajectory varied between 0 and 18 m, with a mean of 4.6 m across all sites. Linear mixed models created to account for site differences showed that, compared to a reference pole without a SWT, bats flew 0.4 m closer to the rotor (95% CI 0.3–0.6 m) if it was out of operation and 0.3 m closer (95% CI 0.1–0.4 m) if it was moving slowly. Exploratory behavior was frequently observed, with many bats deviating from their original flight trajectory to approach the rotor. Among 7,850 documented trajectories, 176 crossed the rotor, including 65 while it was in motion. The collision of one P. pygmaeus individual occurred during the experiment. These results demonstrate that, despite the generally strong ability of bats to evade moving rotor blades, bat casualties at SWTs placed at sites of high bat activity can reach or exceed the current threshold levels set for large wind turbines. As SWTs provide less energy than large turbines, their negative impact on bats should be minimized by avoidance measures such as a bat-friendly site selection or curtailment algorithms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8232403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82324032021-07-07 Collision risk of bats with small wind turbines: Worst-case scenarios near roosts, commuting and hunting structures Hartmann, Stefanie A. Hochradel, Klaus Greule, Sören Günther, Felix Luedtke, Bruntje Schauer-Weisshahn, Horst Brinkmann, Robert PLoS One Research Article Small wind turbines (SWTs) have become increasingly common within the last decade, but their impact on wildlife, especially bats, is largely unknown. We conducted an operational experiment by sequentially placing a mobile SWT with five different operational modes at six sites of high bat activity, including roosts, commuting structures, and highly frequented hunting areas. Bat flight trajectories around the SWT were documented at each site during five consecutive nights using a specifically designed high-spatial-resolution 3D camera. The recordings showed high bat activity levels close to the SWT (7,065 flight trajectories within a 10-m radius). The minimum distance to the rotor of each trajectory varied between 0 and 18 m, with a mean of 4.6 m across all sites. Linear mixed models created to account for site differences showed that, compared to a reference pole without a SWT, bats flew 0.4 m closer to the rotor (95% CI 0.3–0.6 m) if it was out of operation and 0.3 m closer (95% CI 0.1–0.4 m) if it was moving slowly. Exploratory behavior was frequently observed, with many bats deviating from their original flight trajectory to approach the rotor. Among 7,850 documented trajectories, 176 crossed the rotor, including 65 while it was in motion. The collision of one P. pygmaeus individual occurred during the experiment. These results demonstrate that, despite the generally strong ability of bats to evade moving rotor blades, bat casualties at SWTs placed at sites of high bat activity can reach or exceed the current threshold levels set for large wind turbines. As SWTs provide less energy than large turbines, their negative impact on bats should be minimized by avoidance measures such as a bat-friendly site selection or curtailment algorithms. Public Library of Science 2021-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8232403/ /pubmed/34170938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253782 Text en © 2021 Hartmann et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hartmann, Stefanie A.
Hochradel, Klaus
Greule, Sören
Günther, Felix
Luedtke, Bruntje
Schauer-Weisshahn, Horst
Brinkmann, Robert
Collision risk of bats with small wind turbines: Worst-case scenarios near roosts, commuting and hunting structures
title Collision risk of bats with small wind turbines: Worst-case scenarios near roosts, commuting and hunting structures
title_full Collision risk of bats with small wind turbines: Worst-case scenarios near roosts, commuting and hunting structures
title_fullStr Collision risk of bats with small wind turbines: Worst-case scenarios near roosts, commuting and hunting structures
title_full_unstemmed Collision risk of bats with small wind turbines: Worst-case scenarios near roosts, commuting and hunting structures
title_short Collision risk of bats with small wind turbines: Worst-case scenarios near roosts, commuting and hunting structures
title_sort collision risk of bats with small wind turbines: worst-case scenarios near roosts, commuting and hunting structures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8232403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34170938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253782
work_keys_str_mv AT hartmannstefaniea collisionriskofbatswithsmallwindturbinesworstcasescenariosnearroostscommutingandhuntingstructures
AT hochradelklaus collisionriskofbatswithsmallwindturbinesworstcasescenariosnearroostscommutingandhuntingstructures
AT greulesoren collisionriskofbatswithsmallwindturbinesworstcasescenariosnearroostscommutingandhuntingstructures
AT guntherfelix collisionriskofbatswithsmallwindturbinesworstcasescenariosnearroostscommutingandhuntingstructures
AT luedtkebruntje collisionriskofbatswithsmallwindturbinesworstcasescenariosnearroostscommutingandhuntingstructures
AT schauerweisshahnhorst collisionriskofbatswithsmallwindturbinesworstcasescenariosnearroostscommutingandhuntingstructures
AT brinkmannrobert collisionriskofbatswithsmallwindturbinesworstcasescenariosnearroostscommutingandhuntingstructures