Cargando…
Physician and patient concordance in reporting of appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Determine the association between physician-deemed and patient-reported appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 471 patients of 7 ophthalmologists referred for cataract surgery. Ophthalmologists rated patients for cataract surger...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8232411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34170915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253210 |
_version_ | 1783713630099865600 |
---|---|
author | Schlenker, Matthew B. Samet, Saba Lim, Morgan D’Silva, Chelsea Reid, Robert J. Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K. |
author_facet | Schlenker, Matthew B. Samet, Saba Lim, Morgan D’Silva, Chelsea Reid, Robert J. Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K. |
author_sort | Schlenker, Matthew B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Determine the association between physician-deemed and patient-reported appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 471 patients of 7 ophthalmologists referred for cataract surgery. Ophthalmologists rated patients for cataract surgery appropriateness and prioritization using a visual analogue scale of 0–10 preoperatively. All patients completed the eCAPS Quality of Life (QoL), while 313 completed the Catquest-9SF and EQ-5D questionnaires. Regression analyses were applied to determine demographic, clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) associated with appropriateness and prioritization. RESULTS: Two clinical factors (study eye and fellow eye best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)), 2 eCAPS (night driving difficulty, ability to take care of local errands), and 2 Catquest-9SF PROMs (recognizing faces, seeing to walk on uneven ground) were associated with appropriateness. In multivariable regression, the rating physician, 2 clinical criteria (study eye BCVA, anticipated postoperative BCVA) and 1 eCAPS QoL (night driving difficulty) were associated with appropriateness. Prioritization was associated with low income, 8 clinical criteria, 9 eCAPS, 5 Catquest-9SF, and 1 EQ-5D PROMs. In multivariable regression, 1 clinical criterion (study eye BCVA), 2 eCAPS QoL (night driving difficulty, ability to take care of local errands), and 2 Catquest-9SF PROMs (seeing prices, seeing to walk on uneven ground) were significantly associated. CONCLUSIONS: The eCAPS and Catquest-9SF questionnaires show some concordance with physician-deemed appropriateness, and more with prioritization. Binary conversions of PROM scales provide similar modelling, with minimal loss of explanatory power. As physician-deemed appropriateness and prioritization do not completely capture the patient perspective, PROMs may have a role in cataract surgery decision-making frameworks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8232411 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82324112021-07-07 Physician and patient concordance in reporting of appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery Schlenker, Matthew B. Samet, Saba Lim, Morgan D’Silva, Chelsea Reid, Robert J. Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Determine the association between physician-deemed and patient-reported appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 471 patients of 7 ophthalmologists referred for cataract surgery. Ophthalmologists rated patients for cataract surgery appropriateness and prioritization using a visual analogue scale of 0–10 preoperatively. All patients completed the eCAPS Quality of Life (QoL), while 313 completed the Catquest-9SF and EQ-5D questionnaires. Regression analyses were applied to determine demographic, clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) associated with appropriateness and prioritization. RESULTS: Two clinical factors (study eye and fellow eye best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)), 2 eCAPS (night driving difficulty, ability to take care of local errands), and 2 Catquest-9SF PROMs (recognizing faces, seeing to walk on uneven ground) were associated with appropriateness. In multivariable regression, the rating physician, 2 clinical criteria (study eye BCVA, anticipated postoperative BCVA) and 1 eCAPS QoL (night driving difficulty) were associated with appropriateness. Prioritization was associated with low income, 8 clinical criteria, 9 eCAPS, 5 Catquest-9SF, and 1 EQ-5D PROMs. In multivariable regression, 1 clinical criterion (study eye BCVA), 2 eCAPS QoL (night driving difficulty, ability to take care of local errands), and 2 Catquest-9SF PROMs (seeing prices, seeing to walk on uneven ground) were significantly associated. CONCLUSIONS: The eCAPS and Catquest-9SF questionnaires show some concordance with physician-deemed appropriateness, and more with prioritization. Binary conversions of PROM scales provide similar modelling, with minimal loss of explanatory power. As physician-deemed appropriateness and prioritization do not completely capture the patient perspective, PROMs may have a role in cataract surgery decision-making frameworks. Public Library of Science 2021-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8232411/ /pubmed/34170915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253210 Text en © 2021 Schlenker et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schlenker, Matthew B. Samet, Saba Lim, Morgan D’Silva, Chelsea Reid, Robert J. Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K. Physician and patient concordance in reporting of appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery |
title | Physician and patient concordance in reporting of appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery |
title_full | Physician and patient concordance in reporting of appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery |
title_fullStr | Physician and patient concordance in reporting of appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Physician and patient concordance in reporting of appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery |
title_short | Physician and patient concordance in reporting of appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery |
title_sort | physician and patient concordance in reporting of appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8232411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34170915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253210 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schlenkermatthewb physicianandpatientconcordanceinreportingofappropriatenessandprioritizationforcataractsurgery AT sametsaba physicianandpatientconcordanceinreportingofappropriatenessandprioritizationforcataractsurgery AT limmorgan physicianandpatientconcordanceinreportingofappropriatenessandprioritizationforcataractsurgery AT dsilvachelsea physicianandpatientconcordanceinreportingofappropriatenessandprioritizationforcataractsurgery AT reidrobertj physicianandpatientconcordanceinreportingofappropriatenessandprioritizationforcataractsurgery AT ahmediqbalikek physicianandpatientconcordanceinreportingofappropriatenessandprioritizationforcataractsurgery |