Cargando…

Physician and patient concordance in reporting of appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Determine the association between physician-deemed and patient-reported appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 471 patients of 7 ophthalmologists referred for cataract surgery. Ophthalmologists rated patients for cataract surger...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schlenker, Matthew B., Samet, Saba, Lim, Morgan, D’Silva, Chelsea, Reid, Robert J., Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8232411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34170915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253210
_version_ 1783713630099865600
author Schlenker, Matthew B.
Samet, Saba
Lim, Morgan
D’Silva, Chelsea
Reid, Robert J.
Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K.
author_facet Schlenker, Matthew B.
Samet, Saba
Lim, Morgan
D’Silva, Chelsea
Reid, Robert J.
Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K.
author_sort Schlenker, Matthew B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Determine the association between physician-deemed and patient-reported appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 471 patients of 7 ophthalmologists referred for cataract surgery. Ophthalmologists rated patients for cataract surgery appropriateness and prioritization using a visual analogue scale of 0–10 preoperatively. All patients completed the eCAPS Quality of Life (QoL), while 313 completed the Catquest-9SF and EQ-5D questionnaires. Regression analyses were applied to determine demographic, clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) associated with appropriateness and prioritization. RESULTS: Two clinical factors (study eye and fellow eye best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)), 2 eCAPS (night driving difficulty, ability to take care of local errands), and 2 Catquest-9SF PROMs (recognizing faces, seeing to walk on uneven ground) were associated with appropriateness. In multivariable regression, the rating physician, 2 clinical criteria (study eye BCVA, anticipated postoperative BCVA) and 1 eCAPS QoL (night driving difficulty) were associated with appropriateness. Prioritization was associated with low income, 8 clinical criteria, 9 eCAPS, 5 Catquest-9SF, and 1 EQ-5D PROMs. In multivariable regression, 1 clinical criterion (study eye BCVA), 2 eCAPS QoL (night driving difficulty, ability to take care of local errands), and 2 Catquest-9SF PROMs (seeing prices, seeing to walk on uneven ground) were significantly associated. CONCLUSIONS: The eCAPS and Catquest-9SF questionnaires show some concordance with physician-deemed appropriateness, and more with prioritization. Binary conversions of PROM scales provide similar modelling, with minimal loss of explanatory power. As physician-deemed appropriateness and prioritization do not completely capture the patient perspective, PROMs may have a role in cataract surgery decision-making frameworks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8232411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82324112021-07-07 Physician and patient concordance in reporting of appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery Schlenker, Matthew B. Samet, Saba Lim, Morgan D’Silva, Chelsea Reid, Robert J. Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Determine the association between physician-deemed and patient-reported appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 471 patients of 7 ophthalmologists referred for cataract surgery. Ophthalmologists rated patients for cataract surgery appropriateness and prioritization using a visual analogue scale of 0–10 preoperatively. All patients completed the eCAPS Quality of Life (QoL), while 313 completed the Catquest-9SF and EQ-5D questionnaires. Regression analyses were applied to determine demographic, clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) associated with appropriateness and prioritization. RESULTS: Two clinical factors (study eye and fellow eye best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)), 2 eCAPS (night driving difficulty, ability to take care of local errands), and 2 Catquest-9SF PROMs (recognizing faces, seeing to walk on uneven ground) were associated with appropriateness. In multivariable regression, the rating physician, 2 clinical criteria (study eye BCVA, anticipated postoperative BCVA) and 1 eCAPS QoL (night driving difficulty) were associated with appropriateness. Prioritization was associated with low income, 8 clinical criteria, 9 eCAPS, 5 Catquest-9SF, and 1 EQ-5D PROMs. In multivariable regression, 1 clinical criterion (study eye BCVA), 2 eCAPS QoL (night driving difficulty, ability to take care of local errands), and 2 Catquest-9SF PROMs (seeing prices, seeing to walk on uneven ground) were significantly associated. CONCLUSIONS: The eCAPS and Catquest-9SF questionnaires show some concordance with physician-deemed appropriateness, and more with prioritization. Binary conversions of PROM scales provide similar modelling, with minimal loss of explanatory power. As physician-deemed appropriateness and prioritization do not completely capture the patient perspective, PROMs may have a role in cataract surgery decision-making frameworks. Public Library of Science 2021-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8232411/ /pubmed/34170915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253210 Text en © 2021 Schlenker et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schlenker, Matthew B.
Samet, Saba
Lim, Morgan
D’Silva, Chelsea
Reid, Robert J.
Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K.
Physician and patient concordance in reporting of appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery
title Physician and patient concordance in reporting of appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery
title_full Physician and patient concordance in reporting of appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery
title_fullStr Physician and patient concordance in reporting of appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery
title_full_unstemmed Physician and patient concordance in reporting of appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery
title_short Physician and patient concordance in reporting of appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery
title_sort physician and patient concordance in reporting of appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8232411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34170915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253210
work_keys_str_mv AT schlenkermatthewb physicianandpatientconcordanceinreportingofappropriatenessandprioritizationforcataractsurgery
AT sametsaba physicianandpatientconcordanceinreportingofappropriatenessandprioritizationforcataractsurgery
AT limmorgan physicianandpatientconcordanceinreportingofappropriatenessandprioritizationforcataractsurgery
AT dsilvachelsea physicianandpatientconcordanceinreportingofappropriatenessandprioritizationforcataractsurgery
AT reidrobertj physicianandpatientconcordanceinreportingofappropriatenessandprioritizationforcataractsurgery
AT ahmediqbalikek physicianandpatientconcordanceinreportingofappropriatenessandprioritizationforcataractsurgery