Cargando…

Effect of Different Surface Treatments of Lithium Disilicate on the Adhesive Properties of Resin Cements

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the influence of hydrofluoric (HF) acid concentration and conditioning time on the shear bond strength (SBS) of dual cure resin cement to pressed lithium disilicate ceramic compared to treatment with an Etch and Prime self-etching glass-ceramic primer (EP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levartovsky, Shifra, Bohbot, Hilla, Shem-Tov, Keren, Brosh, Tamar, Pilo, Raphael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8232589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34203752
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14123302
_version_ 1783713666649030656
author Levartovsky, Shifra
Bohbot, Hilla
Shem-Tov, Keren
Brosh, Tamar
Pilo, Raphael
author_facet Levartovsky, Shifra
Bohbot, Hilla
Shem-Tov, Keren
Brosh, Tamar
Pilo, Raphael
author_sort Levartovsky, Shifra
collection PubMed
description The aim of the current study was to evaluate the influence of hydrofluoric (HF) acid concentration and conditioning time on the shear bond strength (SBS) of dual cure resin cement to pressed lithium disilicate ceramic compared to treatment with an Etch and Prime self-etching glass-ceramic primer (EP). A total of 100 samples of pressed lithium disilicate (IPS e.max Press, Ivoclar Vivadent) were randomly divided into five groups (n = 20) according to surface treatment: two different concentrations of HF (5% or 9%), for different durations (20 or 90 s), or treatment with EP. Adhesion of light-cured resin cement to the treated surface was tested by the SBS test. The substrate surfaces of the specimen after failures were examined by SEM. Data were analyzed using Weibull distribution. The highest cumulative failure probability of 63.2% of the shear bond strength (η parameter) values was in the 9% HF −90 s group (17.71 MPa), while the lowest values were observed in the 5% HF −20 s group (7.94 MPa). SBS values were not affected significantly by the conditioning time (20 s or 90 s). However, compared to treatment with 5% HF, surface treatment with 9% HF showed a significantly higher η (MPa) as well as β (reliability parameter). Moreover, while compared to 9% HF for 20 s, EP treatment did not differ significantly in SBS values. Examination of the failure mode revealed a mixed mode of failure in all the groups. Within the limits of this study, it is possible to assume that IPS e.max Press surface treatment with 9% HF acid for only 20 s will provide a better bonding strength with resin cement than using 5% HF acid.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8232589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82325892021-06-26 Effect of Different Surface Treatments of Lithium Disilicate on the Adhesive Properties of Resin Cements Levartovsky, Shifra Bohbot, Hilla Shem-Tov, Keren Brosh, Tamar Pilo, Raphael Materials (Basel) Article The aim of the current study was to evaluate the influence of hydrofluoric (HF) acid concentration and conditioning time on the shear bond strength (SBS) of dual cure resin cement to pressed lithium disilicate ceramic compared to treatment with an Etch and Prime self-etching glass-ceramic primer (EP). A total of 100 samples of pressed lithium disilicate (IPS e.max Press, Ivoclar Vivadent) were randomly divided into five groups (n = 20) according to surface treatment: two different concentrations of HF (5% or 9%), for different durations (20 or 90 s), or treatment with EP. Adhesion of light-cured resin cement to the treated surface was tested by the SBS test. The substrate surfaces of the specimen after failures were examined by SEM. Data were analyzed using Weibull distribution. The highest cumulative failure probability of 63.2% of the shear bond strength (η parameter) values was in the 9% HF −90 s group (17.71 MPa), while the lowest values were observed in the 5% HF −20 s group (7.94 MPa). SBS values were not affected significantly by the conditioning time (20 s or 90 s). However, compared to treatment with 5% HF, surface treatment with 9% HF showed a significantly higher η (MPa) as well as β (reliability parameter). Moreover, while compared to 9% HF for 20 s, EP treatment did not differ significantly in SBS values. Examination of the failure mode revealed a mixed mode of failure in all the groups. Within the limits of this study, it is possible to assume that IPS e.max Press surface treatment with 9% HF acid for only 20 s will provide a better bonding strength with resin cement than using 5% HF acid. MDPI 2021-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8232589/ /pubmed/34203752 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14123302 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Levartovsky, Shifra
Bohbot, Hilla
Shem-Tov, Keren
Brosh, Tamar
Pilo, Raphael
Effect of Different Surface Treatments of Lithium Disilicate on the Adhesive Properties of Resin Cements
title Effect of Different Surface Treatments of Lithium Disilicate on the Adhesive Properties of Resin Cements
title_full Effect of Different Surface Treatments of Lithium Disilicate on the Adhesive Properties of Resin Cements
title_fullStr Effect of Different Surface Treatments of Lithium Disilicate on the Adhesive Properties of Resin Cements
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Different Surface Treatments of Lithium Disilicate on the Adhesive Properties of Resin Cements
title_short Effect of Different Surface Treatments of Lithium Disilicate on the Adhesive Properties of Resin Cements
title_sort effect of different surface treatments of lithium disilicate on the adhesive properties of resin cements
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8232589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34203752
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14123302
work_keys_str_mv AT levartovskyshifra effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsoflithiumdisilicateontheadhesivepropertiesofresincements
AT bohbothilla effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsoflithiumdisilicateontheadhesivepropertiesofresincements
AT shemtovkeren effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsoflithiumdisilicateontheadhesivepropertiesofresincements
AT broshtamar effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsoflithiumdisilicateontheadhesivepropertiesofresincements
AT piloraphael effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsoflithiumdisilicateontheadhesivepropertiesofresincements