Cargando…

A Sensitive Homecage-Based Novel Object Recognition Task for Rodents

The recognition of novel objects is a common cognitive test for rodents, but current paradigms have limitations, such as low sensitivity, possible odor confounds and stress due to being performed outside of the homecage. We have developed a paradigm that takes place in the homecage and utilizes four...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wooden, Jessica I., Spinetta, Michael J., Nguyen, Teresa, O’Leary, Charles I., Leasure, J. Leigh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8232937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34177480
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.680042
_version_ 1783713742664499200
author Wooden, Jessica I.
Spinetta, Michael J.
Nguyen, Teresa
O’Leary, Charles I.
Leasure, J. Leigh
author_facet Wooden, Jessica I.
Spinetta, Michael J.
Nguyen, Teresa
O’Leary, Charles I.
Leasure, J. Leigh
author_sort Wooden, Jessica I.
collection PubMed
description The recognition of novel objects is a common cognitive test for rodents, but current paradigms have limitations, such as low sensitivity, possible odor confounds and stress due to being performed outside of the homecage. We have developed a paradigm that takes place in the homecage and utilizes four stimuli per trial, to increase sensitivity. Odor confounds are eliminated because stimuli consist of inexpensive, machined wooden beads purchased in bulk, so each experimental animal has its own set of stimuli. This paradigm consists of three steps. In Step 1, the sampling phase, animals freely explore familiar objects (FO). Novel Objects (NO1 and NO2) are soiled with bedding from the homecage, to acquire odor cues identical to those of the FO. Steps 2 and 3 are test phases. Herein we report results of this paradigm from neurologically intact adult rats and mice of both sexes. Identical procedures were used for both species, except that the stimuli used for the mice were smaller. As expected in Step 2 (NO1 test phase), male and female rats and mice explored NO1 significantly more than FO. In Step 3 (NO2 test phase), rats of both sexes demonstrated a preference for NO2, while this was seen only in female mice. These results indicate robust novelty recognition during Steps 2 and 3 in rats. In mice, this was reliably seen only in Step 2, indicating that Step 3 was difficult for them under the given parameters. This paradigm provides flexibility in that length of the sampling phase, and the delay between test and sampling phases can be adjusted, to tailor task difficulty to the model being tested. In sum, this novel object recognition test is simple to perform, requires no expensive supplies or equipment, is conducted in the homecage (reducing stress), eliminates odor confounds, utilizes 4 stimuli to increase sensitivity, can be performed in both rats and mice, and is highly flexible, as sampling phase and the delay between steps can be adjusted to tailor task difficulty. Collectively, these results indicate that this paradigm can be used to quantify novel object recognition across sex and species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8232937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82329372021-06-26 A Sensitive Homecage-Based Novel Object Recognition Task for Rodents Wooden, Jessica I. Spinetta, Michael J. Nguyen, Teresa O’Leary, Charles I. Leasure, J. Leigh Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience The recognition of novel objects is a common cognitive test for rodents, but current paradigms have limitations, such as low sensitivity, possible odor confounds and stress due to being performed outside of the homecage. We have developed a paradigm that takes place in the homecage and utilizes four stimuli per trial, to increase sensitivity. Odor confounds are eliminated because stimuli consist of inexpensive, machined wooden beads purchased in bulk, so each experimental animal has its own set of stimuli. This paradigm consists of three steps. In Step 1, the sampling phase, animals freely explore familiar objects (FO). Novel Objects (NO1 and NO2) are soiled with bedding from the homecage, to acquire odor cues identical to those of the FO. Steps 2 and 3 are test phases. Herein we report results of this paradigm from neurologically intact adult rats and mice of both sexes. Identical procedures were used for both species, except that the stimuli used for the mice were smaller. As expected in Step 2 (NO1 test phase), male and female rats and mice explored NO1 significantly more than FO. In Step 3 (NO2 test phase), rats of both sexes demonstrated a preference for NO2, while this was seen only in female mice. These results indicate robust novelty recognition during Steps 2 and 3 in rats. In mice, this was reliably seen only in Step 2, indicating that Step 3 was difficult for them under the given parameters. This paradigm provides flexibility in that length of the sampling phase, and the delay between test and sampling phases can be adjusted, to tailor task difficulty to the model being tested. In sum, this novel object recognition test is simple to perform, requires no expensive supplies or equipment, is conducted in the homecage (reducing stress), eliminates odor confounds, utilizes 4 stimuli to increase sensitivity, can be performed in both rats and mice, and is highly flexible, as sampling phase and the delay between steps can be adjusted to tailor task difficulty. Collectively, these results indicate that this paradigm can be used to quantify novel object recognition across sex and species. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8232937/ /pubmed/34177480 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.680042 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wooden, Spinetta, Nguyen, O’Leary and Leasure. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Wooden, Jessica I.
Spinetta, Michael J.
Nguyen, Teresa
O’Leary, Charles I.
Leasure, J. Leigh
A Sensitive Homecage-Based Novel Object Recognition Task for Rodents
title A Sensitive Homecage-Based Novel Object Recognition Task for Rodents
title_full A Sensitive Homecage-Based Novel Object Recognition Task for Rodents
title_fullStr A Sensitive Homecage-Based Novel Object Recognition Task for Rodents
title_full_unstemmed A Sensitive Homecage-Based Novel Object Recognition Task for Rodents
title_short A Sensitive Homecage-Based Novel Object Recognition Task for Rodents
title_sort sensitive homecage-based novel object recognition task for rodents
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8232937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34177480
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.680042
work_keys_str_mv AT woodenjessicai asensitivehomecagebasednovelobjectrecognitiontaskforrodents
AT spinettamichaelj asensitivehomecagebasednovelobjectrecognitiontaskforrodents
AT nguyenteresa asensitivehomecagebasednovelobjectrecognitiontaskforrodents
AT olearycharlesi asensitivehomecagebasednovelobjectrecognitiontaskforrodents
AT leasurejleigh asensitivehomecagebasednovelobjectrecognitiontaskforrodents
AT woodenjessicai sensitivehomecagebasednovelobjectrecognitiontaskforrodents
AT spinettamichaelj sensitivehomecagebasednovelobjectrecognitiontaskforrodents
AT nguyenteresa sensitivehomecagebasednovelobjectrecognitiontaskforrodents
AT olearycharlesi sensitivehomecagebasednovelobjectrecognitiontaskforrodents
AT leasurejleigh sensitivehomecagebasednovelobjectrecognitiontaskforrodents