Cargando…

Comparison of force loss during sliding of low friction and conventional TMA orthodontic archwires: An in vitro study

OBJECTIVE: The goal was to measure and compare the amount of force loss during tooth movement guided by archwires, including a newly introduced low-friction titanium molybdenum alloy (TMA), conventional TMA, and stainless steel archwires. METHODS: The force loss was measured using a specialized biom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alsabti, Nouf, Bourauel, Christoph, Talic, Nabeel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8233268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33263771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00056-020-00266-y
_version_ 1783713813247295488
author Alsabti, Nouf
Bourauel, Christoph
Talic, Nabeel
author_facet Alsabti, Nouf
Bourauel, Christoph
Talic, Nabeel
author_sort Alsabti, Nouf
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The goal was to measure and compare the amount of force loss during tooth movement guided by archwires, including a newly introduced low-friction titanium molybdenum alloy (TMA), conventional TMA, and stainless steel archwires. METHODS: The force loss was measured using a specialized biomechanical set-up, the orthodontic measurement and simulation system (OMSS). A total of 30 specimen were used (10 low-friction TMA (TMA-Low), 10 conventional TMA (TMA-C), and 10 stainless steel (SS) archwires, each having a dimension of 0.016 × 0.022 inches). The conventional and low friction TMA archwires served as test groups, while the SS archwires served as the control group. RESULTS: The mean values of force loss between the three types of wires (TMA‑C, TMA-Low, and SS) were significantly different (p < 0.0001). The highest mean force loss during sliding movement was found in the conventional TMA group (72.1%), followed by low friction TMA (48.8%) and stainless steel wires (33.7%) in a descending order. CONCLUSION: The friction property of the low friction TMA archwire was superior to the conventional TMA archwire but was still inferior to the stainless steel archwire.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8233268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82332682021-07-09 Comparison of force loss during sliding of low friction and conventional TMA orthodontic archwires: An in vitro study Alsabti, Nouf Bourauel, Christoph Talic, Nabeel J Orofac Orthop Original Article OBJECTIVE: The goal was to measure and compare the amount of force loss during tooth movement guided by archwires, including a newly introduced low-friction titanium molybdenum alloy (TMA), conventional TMA, and stainless steel archwires. METHODS: The force loss was measured using a specialized biomechanical set-up, the orthodontic measurement and simulation system (OMSS). A total of 30 specimen were used (10 low-friction TMA (TMA-Low), 10 conventional TMA (TMA-C), and 10 stainless steel (SS) archwires, each having a dimension of 0.016 × 0.022 inches). The conventional and low friction TMA archwires served as test groups, while the SS archwires served as the control group. RESULTS: The mean values of force loss between the three types of wires (TMA‑C, TMA-Low, and SS) were significantly different (p < 0.0001). The highest mean force loss during sliding movement was found in the conventional TMA group (72.1%), followed by low friction TMA (48.8%) and stainless steel wires (33.7%) in a descending order. CONCLUSION: The friction property of the low friction TMA archwire was superior to the conventional TMA archwire but was still inferior to the stainless steel archwire. Springer Medizin 2020-12-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8233268/ /pubmed/33263771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00056-020-00266-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Alsabti, Nouf
Bourauel, Christoph
Talic, Nabeel
Comparison of force loss during sliding of low friction and conventional TMA orthodontic archwires: An in vitro study
title Comparison of force loss during sliding of low friction and conventional TMA orthodontic archwires: An in vitro study
title_full Comparison of force loss during sliding of low friction and conventional TMA orthodontic archwires: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparison of force loss during sliding of low friction and conventional TMA orthodontic archwires: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of force loss during sliding of low friction and conventional TMA orthodontic archwires: An in vitro study
title_short Comparison of force loss during sliding of low friction and conventional TMA orthodontic archwires: An in vitro study
title_sort comparison of force loss during sliding of low friction and conventional tma orthodontic archwires: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8233268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33263771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00056-020-00266-y
work_keys_str_mv AT alsabtinouf comparisonofforcelossduringslidingoflowfrictionandconventionaltmaorthodonticarchwiresaninvitrostudy
AT bourauelchristoph comparisonofforcelossduringslidingoflowfrictionandconventionaltmaorthodonticarchwiresaninvitrostudy
AT talicnabeel comparisonofforcelossduringslidingoflowfrictionandconventionaltmaorthodonticarchwiresaninvitrostudy