Cargando…

Has COVID-19 had a greater impact on female than male oncologists? Results of the ESMO Women for Oncology (W4O) Survey

BACKGROUND: European Society for Medical Oncology Women for Oncology (ESMO W4O) research has previously shown under-representation of female oncologists in leadership roles. As early reports suggested disproportionate effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on women, the ESMO W4O Committee initiated a stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garrido, P., Adjei, A.A., Bajpai, J., Banerjee, S., Berghoff, A.S., Choo, S.P., Felip, E., Furness, A.J.S., Garralda, E., Haanen, J., Letsch, A., Linardou, H., Peters, S., Sessa, C., Tabernero, J., Tsang, J., Yang, J.C-.H., Garassino, M.C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8233649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34144778
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100131
_version_ 1783713900748865536
author Garrido, P.
Adjei, A.A.
Bajpai, J.
Banerjee, S.
Berghoff, A.S.
Choo, S.P.
Felip, E.
Furness, A.J.S.
Garralda, E.
Haanen, J.
Letsch, A.
Linardou, H.
Peters, S.
Sessa, C.
Tabernero, J.
Tsang, J.
Yang, J.C-.H.
Garassino, M.C.
author_facet Garrido, P.
Adjei, A.A.
Bajpai, J.
Banerjee, S.
Berghoff, A.S.
Choo, S.P.
Felip, E.
Furness, A.J.S.
Garralda, E.
Haanen, J.
Letsch, A.
Linardou, H.
Peters, S.
Sessa, C.
Tabernero, J.
Tsang, J.
Yang, J.C-.H.
Garassino, M.C.
author_sort Garrido, P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: European Society for Medical Oncology Women for Oncology (ESMO W4O) research has previously shown under-representation of female oncologists in leadership roles. As early reports suggested disproportionate effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on women, the ESMO W4O Committee initiated a study on the impact of the pandemic on the lives of female and male oncologists. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to ESMO members and put on the ESMO website between 8 June 2020 and 2 July 2020. Questions focused on the working (hospital tasks, laboratory tasks, science) and home (household management, childcare, parent care, personal care) lives of oncologists during and after COVID-19-related lockdowns. RESULTS: Of 649 respondents, 541 completed the questionnaire. Of these, 58% reported that COVID-19 had affected their professional career, 83% of whom said this was in a negative way (85% of women versus 76% of men). Approximately 86% reported that COVID-19 had changed their personal life and 82% their family life. Women were again significantly more affected than men: personal life (89% versus 78%; P = 0.001); family life (84% versus 77%; P = 0.037). During lockdowns, women reported increased time spent on hospital and laboratory tasks compared with men (53% versus 46% and 33% versus 26%, respectively) and a significantly higher proportion of women than men spent less time on science (39% versus 25%) and personal care (58% versus 39%). After confinement, this trend remained for science (42% versus 23%) and personal care (55% versus 36%). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected the professional and home lives of oncologists, especially women. Reduced research time for female oncologists may have long-lasting career consequences, especially for those at key stages in their career. The gender gap for promotion to leadership positions may widen further as a result of the pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8233649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82336492021-06-29 Has COVID-19 had a greater impact on female than male oncologists? Results of the ESMO Women for Oncology (W4O) Survey Garrido, P. Adjei, A.A. Bajpai, J. Banerjee, S. Berghoff, A.S. Choo, S.P. Felip, E. Furness, A.J.S. Garralda, E. Haanen, J. Letsch, A. Linardou, H. Peters, S. Sessa, C. Tabernero, J. Tsang, J. Yang, J.C-.H. Garassino, M.C. ESMO Open Original Research BACKGROUND: European Society for Medical Oncology Women for Oncology (ESMO W4O) research has previously shown under-representation of female oncologists in leadership roles. As early reports suggested disproportionate effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on women, the ESMO W4O Committee initiated a study on the impact of the pandemic on the lives of female and male oncologists. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to ESMO members and put on the ESMO website between 8 June 2020 and 2 July 2020. Questions focused on the working (hospital tasks, laboratory tasks, science) and home (household management, childcare, parent care, personal care) lives of oncologists during and after COVID-19-related lockdowns. RESULTS: Of 649 respondents, 541 completed the questionnaire. Of these, 58% reported that COVID-19 had affected their professional career, 83% of whom said this was in a negative way (85% of women versus 76% of men). Approximately 86% reported that COVID-19 had changed their personal life and 82% their family life. Women were again significantly more affected than men: personal life (89% versus 78%; P = 0.001); family life (84% versus 77%; P = 0.037). During lockdowns, women reported increased time spent on hospital and laboratory tasks compared with men (53% versus 46% and 33% versus 26%, respectively) and a significantly higher proportion of women than men spent less time on science (39% versus 25%) and personal care (58% versus 39%). After confinement, this trend remained for science (42% versus 23%) and personal care (55% versus 36%). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected the professional and home lives of oncologists, especially women. Reduced research time for female oncologists may have long-lasting career consequences, especially for those at key stages in their career. The gender gap for promotion to leadership positions may widen further as a result of the pandemic. Elsevier 2021-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8233649/ /pubmed/34144778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100131 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society for Medical Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Garrido, P.
Adjei, A.A.
Bajpai, J.
Banerjee, S.
Berghoff, A.S.
Choo, S.P.
Felip, E.
Furness, A.J.S.
Garralda, E.
Haanen, J.
Letsch, A.
Linardou, H.
Peters, S.
Sessa, C.
Tabernero, J.
Tsang, J.
Yang, J.C-.H.
Garassino, M.C.
Has COVID-19 had a greater impact on female than male oncologists? Results of the ESMO Women for Oncology (W4O) Survey
title Has COVID-19 had a greater impact on female than male oncologists? Results of the ESMO Women for Oncology (W4O) Survey
title_full Has COVID-19 had a greater impact on female than male oncologists? Results of the ESMO Women for Oncology (W4O) Survey
title_fullStr Has COVID-19 had a greater impact on female than male oncologists? Results of the ESMO Women for Oncology (W4O) Survey
title_full_unstemmed Has COVID-19 had a greater impact on female than male oncologists? Results of the ESMO Women for Oncology (W4O) Survey
title_short Has COVID-19 had a greater impact on female than male oncologists? Results of the ESMO Women for Oncology (W4O) Survey
title_sort has covid-19 had a greater impact on female than male oncologists? results of the esmo women for oncology (w4o) survey
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8233649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34144778
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100131
work_keys_str_mv AT garridop hascovid19hadagreaterimpactonfemalethanmaleoncologistsresultsoftheesmowomenforoncologyw4osurvey
AT adjeiaa hascovid19hadagreaterimpactonfemalethanmaleoncologistsresultsoftheesmowomenforoncologyw4osurvey
AT bajpaij hascovid19hadagreaterimpactonfemalethanmaleoncologistsresultsoftheesmowomenforoncologyw4osurvey
AT banerjees hascovid19hadagreaterimpactonfemalethanmaleoncologistsresultsoftheesmowomenforoncologyw4osurvey
AT berghoffas hascovid19hadagreaterimpactonfemalethanmaleoncologistsresultsoftheesmowomenforoncologyw4osurvey
AT choosp hascovid19hadagreaterimpactonfemalethanmaleoncologistsresultsoftheesmowomenforoncologyw4osurvey
AT felipe hascovid19hadagreaterimpactonfemalethanmaleoncologistsresultsoftheesmowomenforoncologyw4osurvey
AT furnessajs hascovid19hadagreaterimpactonfemalethanmaleoncologistsresultsoftheesmowomenforoncologyw4osurvey
AT garraldae hascovid19hadagreaterimpactonfemalethanmaleoncologistsresultsoftheesmowomenforoncologyw4osurvey
AT haanenj hascovid19hadagreaterimpactonfemalethanmaleoncologistsresultsoftheesmowomenforoncologyw4osurvey
AT letscha hascovid19hadagreaterimpactonfemalethanmaleoncologistsresultsoftheesmowomenforoncologyw4osurvey
AT linardouh hascovid19hadagreaterimpactonfemalethanmaleoncologistsresultsoftheesmowomenforoncologyw4osurvey
AT peterss hascovid19hadagreaterimpactonfemalethanmaleoncologistsresultsoftheesmowomenforoncologyw4osurvey
AT sessac hascovid19hadagreaterimpactonfemalethanmaleoncologistsresultsoftheesmowomenforoncologyw4osurvey
AT taberneroj hascovid19hadagreaterimpactonfemalethanmaleoncologistsresultsoftheesmowomenforoncologyw4osurvey
AT tsangj hascovid19hadagreaterimpactonfemalethanmaleoncologistsresultsoftheesmowomenforoncologyw4osurvey
AT yangjch hascovid19hadagreaterimpactonfemalethanmaleoncologistsresultsoftheesmowomenforoncologyw4osurvey
AT garassinomc hascovid19hadagreaterimpactonfemalethanmaleoncologistsresultsoftheesmowomenforoncologyw4osurvey