Cargando…

Retrospective Monocentric Clinical Study on Male Infertility: Comparison between Two Different Therapeutic Schemes Using Follicle-Stimulating Hormone

Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is a therapeutic option in patients with idiopathic oligozoospermia and normal FSH serum levels. However, few studies have evaluated which dose of FSH is more effective. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of the two most frequently used FSH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Condorelli, Rosita A., Cannarella, Rossella, Crafa, Andrea, Barbagallo, Federica, Mongioì, Laura M., Aversa, Antonio, Greco, Emanuela, Calogero, Aldo E., La Vignera, Sandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8233778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34204212
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122665
_version_ 1783713928402960384
author Condorelli, Rosita A.
Cannarella, Rossella
Crafa, Andrea
Barbagallo, Federica
Mongioì, Laura M.
Aversa, Antonio
Greco, Emanuela
Calogero, Aldo E.
La Vignera, Sandro
author_facet Condorelli, Rosita A.
Cannarella, Rossella
Crafa, Andrea
Barbagallo, Federica
Mongioì, Laura M.
Aversa, Antonio
Greco, Emanuela
Calogero, Aldo E.
La Vignera, Sandro
author_sort Condorelli, Rosita A.
collection PubMed
description Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is a therapeutic option in patients with idiopathic oligozoospermia and normal FSH serum levels. However, few studies have evaluated which dose of FSH is more effective. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of the two most frequently used FSH treatment regimens: 75 IU daily vs. 150 IU three times a week. Patients were retrospectively assigned to two groups. The first group (n = 24) was prescribed highly purified FSH (hpFSH) 75 IU/daily (Group A), and the second group (n = 24) was prescribed hpFSH 150 IU three times a week (Group B) for three months. Before and after treatment, each patient underwent semen analysis, evaluation of the percentage of DNA-fragmented spermatozoa, assessment of testicular volume (by ultrasonography), and measurement of FSH and total testosterone (TT) serum levels. Treatment with hpFSH significantly improved conventional sperm parameters. In detail, sperm concentration increased significantly after treatment only in Group A, whereas total sperm count, percentage of spermatozoa with progressive motility, normal morphology, or alive improved significantly in both groups. Interestingly, the percentage of sperm DNA fragmentation decreased significantly in both groups after treatment with hpFSH. FSH serum levels were expectably higher at the end of the treatment than before hpFSH was administered to both groups. Remarkably, TT serum levels only increased significantly in Group A. Finally, testicular volume was significantly higher in Group A after treatment, while it did not change significantly compared to baseline in Group B. The percentage of FSH responders did not differ significantly between the two groups (8/24 vs. 6/24). The daily administration of hpFSH 75 IU seems more effective than using 150 IU three times a week. However, this therapeutic scheme implies a higher number of injections and slightly higher costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8233778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82337782021-06-27 Retrospective Monocentric Clinical Study on Male Infertility: Comparison between Two Different Therapeutic Schemes Using Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Condorelli, Rosita A. Cannarella, Rossella Crafa, Andrea Barbagallo, Federica Mongioì, Laura M. Aversa, Antonio Greco, Emanuela Calogero, Aldo E. La Vignera, Sandro J Clin Med Article Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is a therapeutic option in patients with idiopathic oligozoospermia and normal FSH serum levels. However, few studies have evaluated which dose of FSH is more effective. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of the two most frequently used FSH treatment regimens: 75 IU daily vs. 150 IU three times a week. Patients were retrospectively assigned to two groups. The first group (n = 24) was prescribed highly purified FSH (hpFSH) 75 IU/daily (Group A), and the second group (n = 24) was prescribed hpFSH 150 IU three times a week (Group B) for three months. Before and after treatment, each patient underwent semen analysis, evaluation of the percentage of DNA-fragmented spermatozoa, assessment of testicular volume (by ultrasonography), and measurement of FSH and total testosterone (TT) serum levels. Treatment with hpFSH significantly improved conventional sperm parameters. In detail, sperm concentration increased significantly after treatment only in Group A, whereas total sperm count, percentage of spermatozoa with progressive motility, normal morphology, or alive improved significantly in both groups. Interestingly, the percentage of sperm DNA fragmentation decreased significantly in both groups after treatment with hpFSH. FSH serum levels were expectably higher at the end of the treatment than before hpFSH was administered to both groups. Remarkably, TT serum levels only increased significantly in Group A. Finally, testicular volume was significantly higher in Group A after treatment, while it did not change significantly compared to baseline in Group B. The percentage of FSH responders did not differ significantly between the two groups (8/24 vs. 6/24). The daily administration of hpFSH 75 IU seems more effective than using 150 IU three times a week. However, this therapeutic scheme implies a higher number of injections and slightly higher costs. MDPI 2021-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8233778/ /pubmed/34204212 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122665 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Condorelli, Rosita A.
Cannarella, Rossella
Crafa, Andrea
Barbagallo, Federica
Mongioì, Laura M.
Aversa, Antonio
Greco, Emanuela
Calogero, Aldo E.
La Vignera, Sandro
Retrospective Monocentric Clinical Study on Male Infertility: Comparison between Two Different Therapeutic Schemes Using Follicle-Stimulating Hormone
title Retrospective Monocentric Clinical Study on Male Infertility: Comparison between Two Different Therapeutic Schemes Using Follicle-Stimulating Hormone
title_full Retrospective Monocentric Clinical Study on Male Infertility: Comparison between Two Different Therapeutic Schemes Using Follicle-Stimulating Hormone
title_fullStr Retrospective Monocentric Clinical Study on Male Infertility: Comparison between Two Different Therapeutic Schemes Using Follicle-Stimulating Hormone
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective Monocentric Clinical Study on Male Infertility: Comparison between Two Different Therapeutic Schemes Using Follicle-Stimulating Hormone
title_short Retrospective Monocentric Clinical Study on Male Infertility: Comparison between Two Different Therapeutic Schemes Using Follicle-Stimulating Hormone
title_sort retrospective monocentric clinical study on male infertility: comparison between two different therapeutic schemes using follicle-stimulating hormone
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8233778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34204212
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122665
work_keys_str_mv AT condorellirositaa retrospectivemonocentricclinicalstudyonmaleinfertilitycomparisonbetweentwodifferenttherapeuticschemesusingfolliclestimulatinghormone
AT cannarellarossella retrospectivemonocentricclinicalstudyonmaleinfertilitycomparisonbetweentwodifferenttherapeuticschemesusingfolliclestimulatinghormone
AT crafaandrea retrospectivemonocentricclinicalstudyonmaleinfertilitycomparisonbetweentwodifferenttherapeuticschemesusingfolliclestimulatinghormone
AT barbagallofederica retrospectivemonocentricclinicalstudyonmaleinfertilitycomparisonbetweentwodifferenttherapeuticschemesusingfolliclestimulatinghormone
AT mongioilauram retrospectivemonocentricclinicalstudyonmaleinfertilitycomparisonbetweentwodifferenttherapeuticschemesusingfolliclestimulatinghormone
AT aversaantonio retrospectivemonocentricclinicalstudyonmaleinfertilitycomparisonbetweentwodifferenttherapeuticschemesusingfolliclestimulatinghormone
AT grecoemanuela retrospectivemonocentricclinicalstudyonmaleinfertilitycomparisonbetweentwodifferenttherapeuticschemesusingfolliclestimulatinghormone
AT calogeroaldoe retrospectivemonocentricclinicalstudyonmaleinfertilitycomparisonbetweentwodifferenttherapeuticschemesusingfolliclestimulatinghormone
AT lavignerasandro retrospectivemonocentricclinicalstudyonmaleinfertilitycomparisonbetweentwodifferenttherapeuticschemesusingfolliclestimulatinghormone