Cargando…
Retrospective Monocentric Clinical Study on Male Infertility: Comparison between Two Different Therapeutic Schemes Using Follicle-Stimulating Hormone
Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is a therapeutic option in patients with idiopathic oligozoospermia and normal FSH serum levels. However, few studies have evaluated which dose of FSH is more effective. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of the two most frequently used FSH...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8233778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34204212 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122665 |
_version_ | 1783713928402960384 |
---|---|
author | Condorelli, Rosita A. Cannarella, Rossella Crafa, Andrea Barbagallo, Federica Mongioì, Laura M. Aversa, Antonio Greco, Emanuela Calogero, Aldo E. La Vignera, Sandro |
author_facet | Condorelli, Rosita A. Cannarella, Rossella Crafa, Andrea Barbagallo, Federica Mongioì, Laura M. Aversa, Antonio Greco, Emanuela Calogero, Aldo E. La Vignera, Sandro |
author_sort | Condorelli, Rosita A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is a therapeutic option in patients with idiopathic oligozoospermia and normal FSH serum levels. However, few studies have evaluated which dose of FSH is more effective. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of the two most frequently used FSH treatment regimens: 75 IU daily vs. 150 IU three times a week. Patients were retrospectively assigned to two groups. The first group (n = 24) was prescribed highly purified FSH (hpFSH) 75 IU/daily (Group A), and the second group (n = 24) was prescribed hpFSH 150 IU three times a week (Group B) for three months. Before and after treatment, each patient underwent semen analysis, evaluation of the percentage of DNA-fragmented spermatozoa, assessment of testicular volume (by ultrasonography), and measurement of FSH and total testosterone (TT) serum levels. Treatment with hpFSH significantly improved conventional sperm parameters. In detail, sperm concentration increased significantly after treatment only in Group A, whereas total sperm count, percentage of spermatozoa with progressive motility, normal morphology, or alive improved significantly in both groups. Interestingly, the percentage of sperm DNA fragmentation decreased significantly in both groups after treatment with hpFSH. FSH serum levels were expectably higher at the end of the treatment than before hpFSH was administered to both groups. Remarkably, TT serum levels only increased significantly in Group A. Finally, testicular volume was significantly higher in Group A after treatment, while it did not change significantly compared to baseline in Group B. The percentage of FSH responders did not differ significantly between the two groups (8/24 vs. 6/24). The daily administration of hpFSH 75 IU seems more effective than using 150 IU three times a week. However, this therapeutic scheme implies a higher number of injections and slightly higher costs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8233778 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82337782021-06-27 Retrospective Monocentric Clinical Study on Male Infertility: Comparison between Two Different Therapeutic Schemes Using Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Condorelli, Rosita A. Cannarella, Rossella Crafa, Andrea Barbagallo, Federica Mongioì, Laura M. Aversa, Antonio Greco, Emanuela Calogero, Aldo E. La Vignera, Sandro J Clin Med Article Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is a therapeutic option in patients with idiopathic oligozoospermia and normal FSH serum levels. However, few studies have evaluated which dose of FSH is more effective. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of the two most frequently used FSH treatment regimens: 75 IU daily vs. 150 IU three times a week. Patients were retrospectively assigned to two groups. The first group (n = 24) was prescribed highly purified FSH (hpFSH) 75 IU/daily (Group A), and the second group (n = 24) was prescribed hpFSH 150 IU three times a week (Group B) for three months. Before and after treatment, each patient underwent semen analysis, evaluation of the percentage of DNA-fragmented spermatozoa, assessment of testicular volume (by ultrasonography), and measurement of FSH and total testosterone (TT) serum levels. Treatment with hpFSH significantly improved conventional sperm parameters. In detail, sperm concentration increased significantly after treatment only in Group A, whereas total sperm count, percentage of spermatozoa with progressive motility, normal morphology, or alive improved significantly in both groups. Interestingly, the percentage of sperm DNA fragmentation decreased significantly in both groups after treatment with hpFSH. FSH serum levels were expectably higher at the end of the treatment than before hpFSH was administered to both groups. Remarkably, TT serum levels only increased significantly in Group A. Finally, testicular volume was significantly higher in Group A after treatment, while it did not change significantly compared to baseline in Group B. The percentage of FSH responders did not differ significantly between the two groups (8/24 vs. 6/24). The daily administration of hpFSH 75 IU seems more effective than using 150 IU three times a week. However, this therapeutic scheme implies a higher number of injections and slightly higher costs. MDPI 2021-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8233778/ /pubmed/34204212 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122665 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Condorelli, Rosita A. Cannarella, Rossella Crafa, Andrea Barbagallo, Federica Mongioì, Laura M. Aversa, Antonio Greco, Emanuela Calogero, Aldo E. La Vignera, Sandro Retrospective Monocentric Clinical Study on Male Infertility: Comparison between Two Different Therapeutic Schemes Using Follicle-Stimulating Hormone |
title | Retrospective Monocentric Clinical Study on Male Infertility: Comparison between Two Different Therapeutic Schemes Using Follicle-Stimulating Hormone |
title_full | Retrospective Monocentric Clinical Study on Male Infertility: Comparison between Two Different Therapeutic Schemes Using Follicle-Stimulating Hormone |
title_fullStr | Retrospective Monocentric Clinical Study on Male Infertility: Comparison between Two Different Therapeutic Schemes Using Follicle-Stimulating Hormone |
title_full_unstemmed | Retrospective Monocentric Clinical Study on Male Infertility: Comparison between Two Different Therapeutic Schemes Using Follicle-Stimulating Hormone |
title_short | Retrospective Monocentric Clinical Study on Male Infertility: Comparison between Two Different Therapeutic Schemes Using Follicle-Stimulating Hormone |
title_sort | retrospective monocentric clinical study on male infertility: comparison between two different therapeutic schemes using follicle-stimulating hormone |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8233778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34204212 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122665 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT condorellirositaa retrospectivemonocentricclinicalstudyonmaleinfertilitycomparisonbetweentwodifferenttherapeuticschemesusingfolliclestimulatinghormone AT cannarellarossella retrospectivemonocentricclinicalstudyonmaleinfertilitycomparisonbetweentwodifferenttherapeuticschemesusingfolliclestimulatinghormone AT crafaandrea retrospectivemonocentricclinicalstudyonmaleinfertilitycomparisonbetweentwodifferenttherapeuticschemesusingfolliclestimulatinghormone AT barbagallofederica retrospectivemonocentricclinicalstudyonmaleinfertilitycomparisonbetweentwodifferenttherapeuticschemesusingfolliclestimulatinghormone AT mongioilauram retrospectivemonocentricclinicalstudyonmaleinfertilitycomparisonbetweentwodifferenttherapeuticschemesusingfolliclestimulatinghormone AT aversaantonio retrospectivemonocentricclinicalstudyonmaleinfertilitycomparisonbetweentwodifferenttherapeuticschemesusingfolliclestimulatinghormone AT grecoemanuela retrospectivemonocentricclinicalstudyonmaleinfertilitycomparisonbetweentwodifferenttherapeuticschemesusingfolliclestimulatinghormone AT calogeroaldoe retrospectivemonocentricclinicalstudyonmaleinfertilitycomparisonbetweentwodifferenttherapeuticschemesusingfolliclestimulatinghormone AT lavignerasandro retrospectivemonocentricclinicalstudyonmaleinfertilitycomparisonbetweentwodifferenttherapeuticschemesusingfolliclestimulatinghormone |