Cargando…

A scoping review of the experience of implementing population testing for SARS-CoV-2

OBJECTIVES: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) – also known as the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) – pandemic has led to the swift introduction of population testing programmes in many countries across the world, using testing modalities such as drive-through, walk-throu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foster, C.R., Campbell, F., Blank, L., Cantrell, A.J., Black, M., Lee, A.C.K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8233909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34352612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.06.012
_version_ 1783713959658913792
author Foster, C.R.
Campbell, F.
Blank, L.
Cantrell, A.J.
Black, M.
Lee, A.C.K.
author_facet Foster, C.R.
Campbell, F.
Blank, L.
Cantrell, A.J.
Black, M.
Lee, A.C.K.
author_sort Foster, C.R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) – also known as the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) – pandemic has led to the swift introduction of population testing programmes in many countries across the world, using testing modalities such as drive-through, walk-through, mobile and home visiting programmes. Here, we provide an overview of the literature describing the experience of implementing population testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). STUDY DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review using Embase, Medline and the Cochrane library in addition to a grey literature search. We identified indicators relevant to process, quality and resource outcomes related to each testing modality. RESULTS: In total, 2999 titles were identified from the academic literature and the grey literature search, of which 22 were relevant. Most studies were from the USA and the Republic of Korea. Drive-through testing centres were the most common testing modality evaluated and these provided a rapid method of testing whilst minimising resource use. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence base for population testing lacks high quality studies, however, the literature provides evaluations of the advantages and limitations of different testing modalities. There is a need for robust evidence in this area to ensure that testing is deployed in a safe and effective manner in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8233909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82339092021-06-28 A scoping review of the experience of implementing population testing for SARS-CoV-2 Foster, C.R. Campbell, F. Blank, L. Cantrell, A.J. Black, M. Lee, A.C.K. Public Health Review Paper OBJECTIVES: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) – also known as the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) – pandemic has led to the swift introduction of population testing programmes in many countries across the world, using testing modalities such as drive-through, walk-through, mobile and home visiting programmes. Here, we provide an overview of the literature describing the experience of implementing population testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). STUDY DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review using Embase, Medline and the Cochrane library in addition to a grey literature search. We identified indicators relevant to process, quality and resource outcomes related to each testing modality. RESULTS: In total, 2999 titles were identified from the academic literature and the grey literature search, of which 22 were relevant. Most studies were from the USA and the Republic of Korea. Drive-through testing centres were the most common testing modality evaluated and these provided a rapid method of testing whilst minimising resource use. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence base for population testing lacks high quality studies, however, the literature provides evaluations of the advantages and limitations of different testing modalities. There is a need for robust evidence in this area to ensure that testing is deployed in a safe and effective manner in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021-09 2021-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8233909/ /pubmed/34352612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.06.012 Text en © 2021 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Review Paper
Foster, C.R.
Campbell, F.
Blank, L.
Cantrell, A.J.
Black, M.
Lee, A.C.K.
A scoping review of the experience of implementing population testing for SARS-CoV-2
title A scoping review of the experience of implementing population testing for SARS-CoV-2
title_full A scoping review of the experience of implementing population testing for SARS-CoV-2
title_fullStr A scoping review of the experience of implementing population testing for SARS-CoV-2
title_full_unstemmed A scoping review of the experience of implementing population testing for SARS-CoV-2
title_short A scoping review of the experience of implementing population testing for SARS-CoV-2
title_sort scoping review of the experience of implementing population testing for sars-cov-2
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8233909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34352612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.06.012
work_keys_str_mv AT fostercr ascopingreviewoftheexperienceofimplementingpopulationtestingforsarscov2
AT campbellf ascopingreviewoftheexperienceofimplementingpopulationtestingforsarscov2
AT blankl ascopingreviewoftheexperienceofimplementingpopulationtestingforsarscov2
AT cantrellaj ascopingreviewoftheexperienceofimplementingpopulationtestingforsarscov2
AT blackm ascopingreviewoftheexperienceofimplementingpopulationtestingforsarscov2
AT leeack ascopingreviewoftheexperienceofimplementingpopulationtestingforsarscov2
AT fostercr scopingreviewoftheexperienceofimplementingpopulationtestingforsarscov2
AT campbellf scopingreviewoftheexperienceofimplementingpopulationtestingforsarscov2
AT blankl scopingreviewoftheexperienceofimplementingpopulationtestingforsarscov2
AT cantrellaj scopingreviewoftheexperienceofimplementingpopulationtestingforsarscov2
AT blackm scopingreviewoftheexperienceofimplementingpopulationtestingforsarscov2
AT leeack scopingreviewoftheexperienceofimplementingpopulationtestingforsarscov2