Cargando…

Survival Outcomes in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Compared to Oestrogen Receptor-Positive Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Around 10–15% of breast cancer diagnoses are invasive lobular cancers (ILC), and they are currently treated in a similar way to the more common invasive ductal cancer (IDC), although they display different characteristics. The main objective of this study was to identify any differen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Timbres, Jasmine, Moss, Charlotte, Mera, Anca, Haire, Anna, Gillett, Cheryl, Van Hemelrijck, Mieke, Sawyer, Elinor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8234044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34207042
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13123036
_version_ 1783713991523041280
author Timbres, Jasmine
Moss, Charlotte
Mera, Anca
Haire, Anna
Gillett, Cheryl
Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
Sawyer, Elinor
author_facet Timbres, Jasmine
Moss, Charlotte
Mera, Anca
Haire, Anna
Gillett, Cheryl
Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
Sawyer, Elinor
author_sort Timbres, Jasmine
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Around 10–15% of breast cancer diagnoses are invasive lobular cancers (ILC), and they are currently treated in a similar way to the more common invasive ductal cancer (IDC), although they display different characteristics. The main objective of this study was to identify any differences in outcome following chemotherapy treatment between ILC and oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) IDC. Results from the analysis show worse survival in patients with ER+HER2− ILC after chemotherapy compared to ER+HER2− IDC, even after correcting for tumour size, grade, age, and nodal involvement at presentation, suggesting a worse response to chemotherapy in ILC. Thus, recommendations for chemotherapy treatment should be considered separately for the two subtypes. However, this association should be studied in a larger population to confirm this finding. ABSTRACT: Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) accounts for 10–15% of breast cancers and has distinct characteristics compared with the more common invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Studies have shown that ILC may be less sensitive to chemotherapy than IDC, with lower rates of complete pathological response after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, but it is not clear how this affects long-term survival. Patients at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust between 1975 and 2016 diagnosed with ER+ IDC or ER+ ILC were eligible for inclusion. Kaplan–Meier plots and Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used for analysis. There was no difference in overall survival comparing ER+ ILC to ER+ IDC (OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.83, 1.04) with a median follow-up time of 8.3 years compared to 8.4 years in IDC. However, ER+HER2− ILC had worse survival compared to ER+HER2− IDC in those that received chemotherapy (OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.06, 2.01). Here, median follow-up time was 7.0 years in ILC compared to 8.1 years in IDC. These results indicate worse overall survival after chemotherapy (neo-adjuvant and adjuvant) in ILC compared to ER+HER2− IDC even when correcting for tumour grade, age, size, and nodal involvement, but validation is needed in a larger study population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8234044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82340442021-06-27 Survival Outcomes in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Compared to Oestrogen Receptor-Positive Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Timbres, Jasmine Moss, Charlotte Mera, Anca Haire, Anna Gillett, Cheryl Van Hemelrijck, Mieke Sawyer, Elinor Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Around 10–15% of breast cancer diagnoses are invasive lobular cancers (ILC), and they are currently treated in a similar way to the more common invasive ductal cancer (IDC), although they display different characteristics. The main objective of this study was to identify any differences in outcome following chemotherapy treatment between ILC and oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) IDC. Results from the analysis show worse survival in patients with ER+HER2− ILC after chemotherapy compared to ER+HER2− IDC, even after correcting for tumour size, grade, age, and nodal involvement at presentation, suggesting a worse response to chemotherapy in ILC. Thus, recommendations for chemotherapy treatment should be considered separately for the two subtypes. However, this association should be studied in a larger population to confirm this finding. ABSTRACT: Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) accounts for 10–15% of breast cancers and has distinct characteristics compared with the more common invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Studies have shown that ILC may be less sensitive to chemotherapy than IDC, with lower rates of complete pathological response after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, but it is not clear how this affects long-term survival. Patients at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust between 1975 and 2016 diagnosed with ER+ IDC or ER+ ILC were eligible for inclusion. Kaplan–Meier plots and Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used for analysis. There was no difference in overall survival comparing ER+ ILC to ER+ IDC (OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.83, 1.04) with a median follow-up time of 8.3 years compared to 8.4 years in IDC. However, ER+HER2− ILC had worse survival compared to ER+HER2− IDC in those that received chemotherapy (OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.06, 2.01). Here, median follow-up time was 7.0 years in ILC compared to 8.1 years in IDC. These results indicate worse overall survival after chemotherapy (neo-adjuvant and adjuvant) in ILC compared to ER+HER2− IDC even when correcting for tumour grade, age, size, and nodal involvement, but validation is needed in a larger study population. MDPI 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8234044/ /pubmed/34207042 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13123036 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Timbres, Jasmine
Moss, Charlotte
Mera, Anca
Haire, Anna
Gillett, Cheryl
Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
Sawyer, Elinor
Survival Outcomes in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Compared to Oestrogen Receptor-Positive Invasive Ductal Carcinoma
title Survival Outcomes in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Compared to Oestrogen Receptor-Positive Invasive Ductal Carcinoma
title_full Survival Outcomes in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Compared to Oestrogen Receptor-Positive Invasive Ductal Carcinoma
title_fullStr Survival Outcomes in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Compared to Oestrogen Receptor-Positive Invasive Ductal Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Survival Outcomes in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Compared to Oestrogen Receptor-Positive Invasive Ductal Carcinoma
title_short Survival Outcomes in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Compared to Oestrogen Receptor-Positive Invasive Ductal Carcinoma
title_sort survival outcomes in invasive lobular carcinoma compared to oestrogen receptor-positive invasive ductal carcinoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8234044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34207042
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13123036
work_keys_str_mv AT timbresjasmine survivaloutcomesininvasivelobularcarcinomacomparedtooestrogenreceptorpositiveinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT mosscharlotte survivaloutcomesininvasivelobularcarcinomacomparedtooestrogenreceptorpositiveinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT meraanca survivaloutcomesininvasivelobularcarcinomacomparedtooestrogenreceptorpositiveinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT haireanna survivaloutcomesininvasivelobularcarcinomacomparedtooestrogenreceptorpositiveinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT gillettcheryl survivaloutcomesininvasivelobularcarcinomacomparedtooestrogenreceptorpositiveinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT vanhemelrijckmieke survivaloutcomesininvasivelobularcarcinomacomparedtooestrogenreceptorpositiveinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT sawyerelinor survivaloutcomesininvasivelobularcarcinomacomparedtooestrogenreceptorpositiveinvasiveductalcarcinoma