Cargando…
Comparison of Physiological Responses and Training Load between Different CrossFit(®) Workouts with Equalized Volume in Men and Women
The purpose of the present study was to compare the heart rate (HR), blood lactate and training load between different CrossFit(®) workouts, with equalized total work volumes in men and women. The study included 23 individuals (13 men and 10 women) experienced in CrossFit(®) training, who performed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8234424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34202948 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11060586 |
_version_ | 1783714080987545600 |
---|---|
author | Toledo, Ronam Dias, Marcelo R. Toledo, Ramon Erotides, Renato Pinto, Daniel S. Reis, Victor M. Novaes, Jefferson S. Vianna, Jeferson M. Heinrich, Katie M. |
author_facet | Toledo, Ronam Dias, Marcelo R. Toledo, Ramon Erotides, Renato Pinto, Daniel S. Reis, Victor M. Novaes, Jefferson S. Vianna, Jeferson M. Heinrich, Katie M. |
author_sort | Toledo, Ronam |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of the present study was to compare the heart rate (HR), blood lactate and training load between different CrossFit(®) workouts, with equalized total work volumes in men and women. The study included 23 individuals (13 men and 10 women) experienced in CrossFit(®) training, who performed two workouts with different training types (as many reps as possible (AMRAP) and ‘for time’) but an equalized volume. Measurements of lactate, HR and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were performed. The results show that there was no HR interaction between workout time and sex (p = 0.822; η(2) = 0.006) and between workout type and sex (p = 0.064, η(2) = 0.803). The HR significantly differed during each workout type (p < 0.001, η(2) = 0.621), but not between the two workout types (p = 0.552, η(2) = 0.017). Lactate showed no difference between the workout types (p = 0.474, η(2) = 0.768), although the training load was higher (p = 0.033, η(2) = 0.199) in women when they performed AMRAP. Altogether, the HR was not significantly different between training types or sex, while RPE, lactate and training load showed statistically significant differences depending on the group (women or men) or workout type (AMRAP or ‘for time’). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8234424 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82344242021-06-27 Comparison of Physiological Responses and Training Load between Different CrossFit(®) Workouts with Equalized Volume in Men and Women Toledo, Ronam Dias, Marcelo R. Toledo, Ramon Erotides, Renato Pinto, Daniel S. Reis, Victor M. Novaes, Jefferson S. Vianna, Jeferson M. Heinrich, Katie M. Life (Basel) Article The purpose of the present study was to compare the heart rate (HR), blood lactate and training load between different CrossFit(®) workouts, with equalized total work volumes in men and women. The study included 23 individuals (13 men and 10 women) experienced in CrossFit(®) training, who performed two workouts with different training types (as many reps as possible (AMRAP) and ‘for time’) but an equalized volume. Measurements of lactate, HR and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were performed. The results show that there was no HR interaction between workout time and sex (p = 0.822; η(2) = 0.006) and between workout type and sex (p = 0.064, η(2) = 0.803). The HR significantly differed during each workout type (p < 0.001, η(2) = 0.621), but not between the two workout types (p = 0.552, η(2) = 0.017). Lactate showed no difference between the workout types (p = 0.474, η(2) = 0.768), although the training load was higher (p = 0.033, η(2) = 0.199) in women when they performed AMRAP. Altogether, the HR was not significantly different between training types or sex, while RPE, lactate and training load showed statistically significant differences depending on the group (women or men) or workout type (AMRAP or ‘for time’). MDPI 2021-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8234424/ /pubmed/34202948 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11060586 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Toledo, Ronam Dias, Marcelo R. Toledo, Ramon Erotides, Renato Pinto, Daniel S. Reis, Victor M. Novaes, Jefferson S. Vianna, Jeferson M. Heinrich, Katie M. Comparison of Physiological Responses and Training Load between Different CrossFit(®) Workouts with Equalized Volume in Men and Women |
title | Comparison of Physiological Responses and Training Load between Different CrossFit(®) Workouts with Equalized Volume in Men and Women |
title_full | Comparison of Physiological Responses and Training Load between Different CrossFit(®) Workouts with Equalized Volume in Men and Women |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Physiological Responses and Training Load between Different CrossFit(®) Workouts with Equalized Volume in Men and Women |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Physiological Responses and Training Load between Different CrossFit(®) Workouts with Equalized Volume in Men and Women |
title_short | Comparison of Physiological Responses and Training Load between Different CrossFit(®) Workouts with Equalized Volume in Men and Women |
title_sort | comparison of physiological responses and training load between different crossfit(®) workouts with equalized volume in men and women |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8234424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34202948 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11060586 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT toledoronam comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesandtrainingloadbetweendifferentcrossfitworkoutswithequalizedvolumeinmenandwomen AT diasmarcelor comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesandtrainingloadbetweendifferentcrossfitworkoutswithequalizedvolumeinmenandwomen AT toledoramon comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesandtrainingloadbetweendifferentcrossfitworkoutswithequalizedvolumeinmenandwomen AT erotidesrenato comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesandtrainingloadbetweendifferentcrossfitworkoutswithequalizedvolumeinmenandwomen AT pintodaniels comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesandtrainingloadbetweendifferentcrossfitworkoutswithequalizedvolumeinmenandwomen AT reisvictorm comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesandtrainingloadbetweendifferentcrossfitworkoutswithequalizedvolumeinmenandwomen AT novaesjeffersons comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesandtrainingloadbetweendifferentcrossfitworkoutswithequalizedvolumeinmenandwomen AT viannajefersonm comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesandtrainingloadbetweendifferentcrossfitworkoutswithequalizedvolumeinmenandwomen AT heinrichkatiem comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesandtrainingloadbetweendifferentcrossfitworkoutswithequalizedvolumeinmenandwomen |