Cargando…

Comparison of Physiological Responses and Training Load between Different CrossFit(®) Workouts with Equalized Volume in Men and Women

The purpose of the present study was to compare the heart rate (HR), blood lactate and training load between different CrossFit(®) workouts, with equalized total work volumes in men and women. The study included 23 individuals (13 men and 10 women) experienced in CrossFit(®) training, who performed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toledo, Ronam, Dias, Marcelo R., Toledo, Ramon, Erotides, Renato, Pinto, Daniel S., Reis, Victor M., Novaes, Jefferson S., Vianna, Jeferson M., Heinrich, Katie M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8234424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34202948
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11060586
_version_ 1783714080987545600
author Toledo, Ronam
Dias, Marcelo R.
Toledo, Ramon
Erotides, Renato
Pinto, Daniel S.
Reis, Victor M.
Novaes, Jefferson S.
Vianna, Jeferson M.
Heinrich, Katie M.
author_facet Toledo, Ronam
Dias, Marcelo R.
Toledo, Ramon
Erotides, Renato
Pinto, Daniel S.
Reis, Victor M.
Novaes, Jefferson S.
Vianna, Jeferson M.
Heinrich, Katie M.
author_sort Toledo, Ronam
collection PubMed
description The purpose of the present study was to compare the heart rate (HR), blood lactate and training load between different CrossFit(®) workouts, with equalized total work volumes in men and women. The study included 23 individuals (13 men and 10 women) experienced in CrossFit(®) training, who performed two workouts with different training types (as many reps as possible (AMRAP) and ‘for time’) but an equalized volume. Measurements of lactate, HR and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were performed. The results show that there was no HR interaction between workout time and sex (p = 0.822; η(2) = 0.006) and between workout type and sex (p = 0.064, η(2) = 0.803). The HR significantly differed during each workout type (p < 0.001, η(2) = 0.621), but not between the two workout types (p = 0.552, η(2) = 0.017). Lactate showed no difference between the workout types (p = 0.474, η(2) = 0.768), although the training load was higher (p = 0.033, η(2) = 0.199) in women when they performed AMRAP. Altogether, the HR was not significantly different between training types or sex, while RPE, lactate and training load showed statistically significant differences depending on the group (women or men) or workout type (AMRAP or ‘for time’).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8234424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82344242021-06-27 Comparison of Physiological Responses and Training Load between Different CrossFit(®) Workouts with Equalized Volume in Men and Women Toledo, Ronam Dias, Marcelo R. Toledo, Ramon Erotides, Renato Pinto, Daniel S. Reis, Victor M. Novaes, Jefferson S. Vianna, Jeferson M. Heinrich, Katie M. Life (Basel) Article The purpose of the present study was to compare the heart rate (HR), blood lactate and training load between different CrossFit(®) workouts, with equalized total work volumes in men and women. The study included 23 individuals (13 men and 10 women) experienced in CrossFit(®) training, who performed two workouts with different training types (as many reps as possible (AMRAP) and ‘for time’) but an equalized volume. Measurements of lactate, HR and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were performed. The results show that there was no HR interaction between workout time and sex (p = 0.822; η(2) = 0.006) and between workout type and sex (p = 0.064, η(2) = 0.803). The HR significantly differed during each workout type (p < 0.001, η(2) = 0.621), but not between the two workout types (p = 0.552, η(2) = 0.017). Lactate showed no difference between the workout types (p = 0.474, η(2) = 0.768), although the training load was higher (p = 0.033, η(2) = 0.199) in women when they performed AMRAP. Altogether, the HR was not significantly different between training types or sex, while RPE, lactate and training load showed statistically significant differences depending on the group (women or men) or workout type (AMRAP or ‘for time’). MDPI 2021-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8234424/ /pubmed/34202948 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11060586 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Toledo, Ronam
Dias, Marcelo R.
Toledo, Ramon
Erotides, Renato
Pinto, Daniel S.
Reis, Victor M.
Novaes, Jefferson S.
Vianna, Jeferson M.
Heinrich, Katie M.
Comparison of Physiological Responses and Training Load between Different CrossFit(®) Workouts with Equalized Volume in Men and Women
title Comparison of Physiological Responses and Training Load between Different CrossFit(®) Workouts with Equalized Volume in Men and Women
title_full Comparison of Physiological Responses and Training Load between Different CrossFit(®) Workouts with Equalized Volume in Men and Women
title_fullStr Comparison of Physiological Responses and Training Load between Different CrossFit(®) Workouts with Equalized Volume in Men and Women
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Physiological Responses and Training Load between Different CrossFit(®) Workouts with Equalized Volume in Men and Women
title_short Comparison of Physiological Responses and Training Load between Different CrossFit(®) Workouts with Equalized Volume in Men and Women
title_sort comparison of physiological responses and training load between different crossfit(®) workouts with equalized volume in men and women
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8234424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34202948
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11060586
work_keys_str_mv AT toledoronam comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesandtrainingloadbetweendifferentcrossfitworkoutswithequalizedvolumeinmenandwomen
AT diasmarcelor comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesandtrainingloadbetweendifferentcrossfitworkoutswithequalizedvolumeinmenandwomen
AT toledoramon comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesandtrainingloadbetweendifferentcrossfitworkoutswithequalizedvolumeinmenandwomen
AT erotidesrenato comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesandtrainingloadbetweendifferentcrossfitworkoutswithequalizedvolumeinmenandwomen
AT pintodaniels comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesandtrainingloadbetweendifferentcrossfitworkoutswithequalizedvolumeinmenandwomen
AT reisvictorm comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesandtrainingloadbetweendifferentcrossfitworkoutswithequalizedvolumeinmenandwomen
AT novaesjeffersons comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesandtrainingloadbetweendifferentcrossfitworkoutswithequalizedvolumeinmenandwomen
AT viannajefersonm comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesandtrainingloadbetweendifferentcrossfitworkoutswithequalizedvolumeinmenandwomen
AT heinrichkatiem comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesandtrainingloadbetweendifferentcrossfitworkoutswithequalizedvolumeinmenandwomen