Cargando…
Digital Management Systems in Academic Health Sciences Laboratories: A Scoping Review
Good laboratory practices (GLP) increase the quality and traceability of results in health sciences research. However, factors such as high staff turnover, insufficient resources, and a lack of training for managers may limit their implementation in research and academic laboratories. This Scoping R...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8234580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34208584 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9060739 |
_version_ | 1783714116725112832 |
---|---|
author | Timóteo, Margareth Lourenço, Emanuelle Brochado, Ana Carolina Domenico, Luciana da Silva, Joice Oliveira, Bruna Barbosa, Renata Montemezzi, Pietro Mourão, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros Olej, Beni Alves, Gutemberg |
author_facet | Timóteo, Margareth Lourenço, Emanuelle Brochado, Ana Carolina Domenico, Luciana da Silva, Joice Oliveira, Bruna Barbosa, Renata Montemezzi, Pietro Mourão, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros Olej, Beni Alves, Gutemberg |
author_sort | Timóteo, Margareth |
collection | PubMed |
description | Good laboratory practices (GLP) increase the quality and traceability of results in health sciences research. However, factors such as high staff turnover, insufficient resources, and a lack of training for managers may limit their implementation in research and academic laboratories. This Scoping Review aimed to identify digital tools for managing academic health sciences and experimental medicine laboratories and their relationship with good practices. Following the PRISMA-ScR 2018 criteria, a search strategy was conducted until April 2021 in the databases PUBMED, Web of Sciences, and Health Virtual Library. A critical appraisal of the selected references was conducted, followed by data charting. The search identified twenty-one eligible articles, mainly originated from high-income countries, describing the development and/or implementation of thirty-two electronic management systems. Most studies described software functionalities, while nine evaluated and discussed impacts on management, reporting both improvements in the workflow and system limitations during implementation. In general, the studies point to a contribution to different management issues related to GLP principles. In conclusion, this review identified evolving evidence that digital laboratory management systems may represent important tools in compliance with the principles of good practices in experimental medicine and health sciences research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8234580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82345802021-06-27 Digital Management Systems in Academic Health Sciences Laboratories: A Scoping Review Timóteo, Margareth Lourenço, Emanuelle Brochado, Ana Carolina Domenico, Luciana da Silva, Joice Oliveira, Bruna Barbosa, Renata Montemezzi, Pietro Mourão, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros Olej, Beni Alves, Gutemberg Healthcare (Basel) Review Good laboratory practices (GLP) increase the quality and traceability of results in health sciences research. However, factors such as high staff turnover, insufficient resources, and a lack of training for managers may limit their implementation in research and academic laboratories. This Scoping Review aimed to identify digital tools for managing academic health sciences and experimental medicine laboratories and their relationship with good practices. Following the PRISMA-ScR 2018 criteria, a search strategy was conducted until April 2021 in the databases PUBMED, Web of Sciences, and Health Virtual Library. A critical appraisal of the selected references was conducted, followed by data charting. The search identified twenty-one eligible articles, mainly originated from high-income countries, describing the development and/or implementation of thirty-two electronic management systems. Most studies described software functionalities, while nine evaluated and discussed impacts on management, reporting both improvements in the workflow and system limitations during implementation. In general, the studies point to a contribution to different management issues related to GLP principles. In conclusion, this review identified evolving evidence that digital laboratory management systems may represent important tools in compliance with the principles of good practices in experimental medicine and health sciences research. MDPI 2021-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8234580/ /pubmed/34208584 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9060739 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Timóteo, Margareth Lourenço, Emanuelle Brochado, Ana Carolina Domenico, Luciana da Silva, Joice Oliveira, Bruna Barbosa, Renata Montemezzi, Pietro Mourão, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros Olej, Beni Alves, Gutemberg Digital Management Systems in Academic Health Sciences Laboratories: A Scoping Review |
title | Digital Management Systems in Academic Health Sciences Laboratories: A Scoping Review |
title_full | Digital Management Systems in Academic Health Sciences Laboratories: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Digital Management Systems in Academic Health Sciences Laboratories: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Digital Management Systems in Academic Health Sciences Laboratories: A Scoping Review |
title_short | Digital Management Systems in Academic Health Sciences Laboratories: A Scoping Review |
title_sort | digital management systems in academic health sciences laboratories: a scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8234580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34208584 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9060739 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT timoteomargareth digitalmanagementsystemsinacademichealthscienceslaboratoriesascopingreview AT lourencoemanuelle digitalmanagementsystemsinacademichealthscienceslaboratoriesascopingreview AT brochadoanacarolina digitalmanagementsystemsinacademichealthscienceslaboratoriesascopingreview AT domenicoluciana digitalmanagementsystemsinacademichealthscienceslaboratoriesascopingreview AT dasilvajoice digitalmanagementsystemsinacademichealthscienceslaboratoriesascopingreview AT oliveirabruna digitalmanagementsystemsinacademichealthscienceslaboratoriesascopingreview AT barbosarenata digitalmanagementsystemsinacademichealthscienceslaboratoriesascopingreview AT montemezzipietro digitalmanagementsystemsinacademichealthscienceslaboratoriesascopingreview AT mouraocarlosfernandodealmeidabarros digitalmanagementsystemsinacademichealthscienceslaboratoriesascopingreview AT olejbeni digitalmanagementsystemsinacademichealthscienceslaboratoriesascopingreview AT alvesgutemberg digitalmanagementsystemsinacademichealthscienceslaboratoriesascopingreview |