Cargando…
“We are not hard to reach, but we may find it hard to trust” …. Involving and engaging ‘seldom listened to’ community voices in clinical translational health research: a social innovation approach
BACKGROUND: Public involvement in clinical translational research is increasingly recognised as essential for relevant and reliable research. Public involvement must be diverse and inclusive to enable research that has the potential to reach those that stand to benefit from it the most, and thus add...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8234650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34174961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00292-z |
_version_ | 1783714133155250176 |
---|---|
author | Islam, Safina Joseph, Olivia Chaudry, Atiha Forde, Davine Keane, Annie Wilson, Cassie Begum, Nasima Parsons, Suzanne Grey, Tracy Holmes, Leah Starling, Bella |
author_facet | Islam, Safina Joseph, Olivia Chaudry, Atiha Forde, Davine Keane, Annie Wilson, Cassie Begum, Nasima Parsons, Suzanne Grey, Tracy Holmes, Leah Starling, Bella |
author_sort | Islam, Safina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Public involvement in clinical translational research is increasingly recognised as essential for relevant and reliable research. Public involvement must be diverse and inclusive to enable research that has the potential to reach those that stand to benefit from it the most, and thus address issues of health equity. Several recent reports, however, indicate that public involvement is exclusive, including in its interactions with ethnic groups. This paper outlines a novel community-led methodology – a community sandpit – to address the inclusion of ethnic groups in public involvement in research, reports on its evaluation, findings, legacy and impact. METHODS: Through detailed planning – thinking through and taking into account all stakeholders perspectives in the planning and design of the sandpit, relationship-building, co-design and co-delivery between the Public Programmes team based at Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust and the Greater Manchester Black and Minority Ethnic Network - the community sandpit was held in July 2018. RESULTS: Fifteen community organisations took part in the two-day event, as well as six researchers, and six creative practitioners. Six community-based partnership projects were seed-funded; four of these received additional funding from other sources also. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of the sandpit showed the format to be well-received by all: it levelled power relationships between community organisations, health researchers and research infrastructure; it developed capacity amongst researchers about the accessibility, role and potential of community organisations. Described as “not another community seed fund” by community partners, the sandpit offered community partners, equitable avenues for collaboration within Greater Manchester translational research and led to the formation of the Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Research Advisory Group (BRAG Vocal Website information, - https://www.wearevocal.org/opportunities/black-asian-and-minority-ethnic-research-advisory-group-brag/, 2021). The method has the potential to be replicated elsewhere to support inclusive public involvement in research and inclusive research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40900-021-00292-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8234650 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82346502021-06-28 “We are not hard to reach, but we may find it hard to trust” …. Involving and engaging ‘seldom listened to’ community voices in clinical translational health research: a social innovation approach Islam, Safina Joseph, Olivia Chaudry, Atiha Forde, Davine Keane, Annie Wilson, Cassie Begum, Nasima Parsons, Suzanne Grey, Tracy Holmes, Leah Starling, Bella Res Involv Engagem Methodology BACKGROUND: Public involvement in clinical translational research is increasingly recognised as essential for relevant and reliable research. Public involvement must be diverse and inclusive to enable research that has the potential to reach those that stand to benefit from it the most, and thus address issues of health equity. Several recent reports, however, indicate that public involvement is exclusive, including in its interactions with ethnic groups. This paper outlines a novel community-led methodology – a community sandpit – to address the inclusion of ethnic groups in public involvement in research, reports on its evaluation, findings, legacy and impact. METHODS: Through detailed planning – thinking through and taking into account all stakeholders perspectives in the planning and design of the sandpit, relationship-building, co-design and co-delivery between the Public Programmes team based at Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust and the Greater Manchester Black and Minority Ethnic Network - the community sandpit was held in July 2018. RESULTS: Fifteen community organisations took part in the two-day event, as well as six researchers, and six creative practitioners. Six community-based partnership projects were seed-funded; four of these received additional funding from other sources also. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of the sandpit showed the format to be well-received by all: it levelled power relationships between community organisations, health researchers and research infrastructure; it developed capacity amongst researchers about the accessibility, role and potential of community organisations. Described as “not another community seed fund” by community partners, the sandpit offered community partners, equitable avenues for collaboration within Greater Manchester translational research and led to the formation of the Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Research Advisory Group (BRAG Vocal Website information, - https://www.wearevocal.org/opportunities/black-asian-and-minority-ethnic-research-advisory-group-brag/, 2021). The method has the potential to be replicated elsewhere to support inclusive public involvement in research and inclusive research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40900-021-00292-z. BioMed Central 2021-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8234650/ /pubmed/34174961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00292-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Islam, Safina Joseph, Olivia Chaudry, Atiha Forde, Davine Keane, Annie Wilson, Cassie Begum, Nasima Parsons, Suzanne Grey, Tracy Holmes, Leah Starling, Bella “We are not hard to reach, but we may find it hard to trust” …. Involving and engaging ‘seldom listened to’ community voices in clinical translational health research: a social innovation approach |
title | “We are not hard to reach, but we may find it hard to trust” …. Involving and engaging ‘seldom listened to’ community voices in clinical translational health research: a social innovation approach |
title_full | “We are not hard to reach, but we may find it hard to trust” …. Involving and engaging ‘seldom listened to’ community voices in clinical translational health research: a social innovation approach |
title_fullStr | “We are not hard to reach, but we may find it hard to trust” …. Involving and engaging ‘seldom listened to’ community voices in clinical translational health research: a social innovation approach |
title_full_unstemmed | “We are not hard to reach, but we may find it hard to trust” …. Involving and engaging ‘seldom listened to’ community voices in clinical translational health research: a social innovation approach |
title_short | “We are not hard to reach, but we may find it hard to trust” …. Involving and engaging ‘seldom listened to’ community voices in clinical translational health research: a social innovation approach |
title_sort | “we are not hard to reach, but we may find it hard to trust” …. involving and engaging ‘seldom listened to’ community voices in clinical translational health research: a social innovation approach |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8234650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34174961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00292-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT islamsafina wearenothardtoreachbutwemayfindithardtotrustinvolvingandengagingseldomlistenedtocommunityvoicesinclinicaltranslationalhealthresearchasocialinnovationapproach AT josepholivia wearenothardtoreachbutwemayfindithardtotrustinvolvingandengagingseldomlistenedtocommunityvoicesinclinicaltranslationalhealthresearchasocialinnovationapproach AT chaudryatiha wearenothardtoreachbutwemayfindithardtotrustinvolvingandengagingseldomlistenedtocommunityvoicesinclinicaltranslationalhealthresearchasocialinnovationapproach AT fordedavine wearenothardtoreachbutwemayfindithardtotrustinvolvingandengagingseldomlistenedtocommunityvoicesinclinicaltranslationalhealthresearchasocialinnovationapproach AT keaneannie wearenothardtoreachbutwemayfindithardtotrustinvolvingandengagingseldomlistenedtocommunityvoicesinclinicaltranslationalhealthresearchasocialinnovationapproach AT wilsoncassie wearenothardtoreachbutwemayfindithardtotrustinvolvingandengagingseldomlistenedtocommunityvoicesinclinicaltranslationalhealthresearchasocialinnovationapproach AT begumnasima wearenothardtoreachbutwemayfindithardtotrustinvolvingandengagingseldomlistenedtocommunityvoicesinclinicaltranslationalhealthresearchasocialinnovationapproach AT parsonssuzanne wearenothardtoreachbutwemayfindithardtotrustinvolvingandengagingseldomlistenedtocommunityvoicesinclinicaltranslationalhealthresearchasocialinnovationapproach AT greytracy wearenothardtoreachbutwemayfindithardtotrustinvolvingandengagingseldomlistenedtocommunityvoicesinclinicaltranslationalhealthresearchasocialinnovationapproach AT holmesleah wearenothardtoreachbutwemayfindithardtotrustinvolvingandengagingseldomlistenedtocommunityvoicesinclinicaltranslationalhealthresearchasocialinnovationapproach AT starlingbella wearenothardtoreachbutwemayfindithardtotrustinvolvingandengagingseldomlistenedtocommunityvoicesinclinicaltranslationalhealthresearchasocialinnovationapproach |