Cargando…

Freestyle aortic root prosthesis in combination with aortic replacement and open anastomosis: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND: The Freestyle® bioprosthesis is used for pathologies of the aortic root. Additional resection of the ascending aorta and the proximal arch in dissections or aneurysms might be indicated. The aim was to assess mid-term outcome regarding prosthetic performance, stroke, reoperations, and su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zientara, Alicja, Rosselet-Droux, Kim, Bruijnen, Hans, Odavic, Dragan, Genoni, Michele, Dzemali, Omer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8234670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34174918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01562-3
_version_ 1783714137707118592
author Zientara, Alicja
Rosselet-Droux, Kim
Bruijnen, Hans
Odavic, Dragan
Genoni, Michele
Dzemali, Omer
author_facet Zientara, Alicja
Rosselet-Droux, Kim
Bruijnen, Hans
Odavic, Dragan
Genoni, Michele
Dzemali, Omer
author_sort Zientara, Alicja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Freestyle® bioprosthesis is used for pathologies of the aortic root. Additional resection of the ascending aorta and the proximal arch in dissections or aneurysms might be indicated. The aim was to assess mid-term outcome regarding prosthetic performance, stroke, reoperations, and survival in various pathologies comparing patients with and without additional procedures on the ascending aorta and proximal arch focusing on the standardised technique of unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion under moderate hypothermia. METHODS: Retrospective data analysis of 278 consecutive patients after Freestyle® root replacement between September 2007 and March 2017. Patients were divided in three categories due to the pathology of the aortic root (re-operation vs endocarditis vs dissection). Two groups based on the aortic anastomosis technique (open arch anastomosis (OA) versus non-open arch anastomosis (non-OA) were compared (119 OA vs 159 non-OA). Cardiovascular risk, previous cardiac events, intra- and postoperative data were evaluated. Inferential statistics were performed with Mann-Whitney U-test. Nominal and categorical variables were tested with Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to assess survival. RESULTS: The follow-up rate was 90% (median follow-up: 39.5 months). There were differences in the indication (endocarditis: OA 5 (4.2%) vs non-OA 36 (24%), p < 0.0001; dissection: OA 13 (10.9%) vs non-OA 2 (1.3%); p = 0.0007). OA patients had less perioperative stroke (1 (1%) vs 15 (10%), p = 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (9 vs 12 days, p = 0.0004). There were no differences in the mortality (in-hospital: OA 8 (7%) vs non-OA 8 (5%); p = 0.6; death at follow-up: OA 5 (5%) vs non-OA 15 (11%); p = 0.1). Overall valve performance showed a well-functioning valve in 97.3% at follow-up. CONCLUSION: The valve performance showed excellent results regardless of the initial indication. The incidence of stroke was lower in patients receiving an open arch anastomosis using unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion without elevated mortality or prolonged hospital stay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8234670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82346702021-06-28 Freestyle aortic root prosthesis in combination with aortic replacement and open anastomosis: a retrospective analysis Zientara, Alicja Rosselet-Droux, Kim Bruijnen, Hans Odavic, Dragan Genoni, Michele Dzemali, Omer J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: The Freestyle® bioprosthesis is used for pathologies of the aortic root. Additional resection of the ascending aorta and the proximal arch in dissections or aneurysms might be indicated. The aim was to assess mid-term outcome regarding prosthetic performance, stroke, reoperations, and survival in various pathologies comparing patients with and without additional procedures on the ascending aorta and proximal arch focusing on the standardised technique of unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion under moderate hypothermia. METHODS: Retrospective data analysis of 278 consecutive patients after Freestyle® root replacement between September 2007 and March 2017. Patients were divided in three categories due to the pathology of the aortic root (re-operation vs endocarditis vs dissection). Two groups based on the aortic anastomosis technique (open arch anastomosis (OA) versus non-open arch anastomosis (non-OA) were compared (119 OA vs 159 non-OA). Cardiovascular risk, previous cardiac events, intra- and postoperative data were evaluated. Inferential statistics were performed with Mann-Whitney U-test. Nominal and categorical variables were tested with Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to assess survival. RESULTS: The follow-up rate was 90% (median follow-up: 39.5 months). There were differences in the indication (endocarditis: OA 5 (4.2%) vs non-OA 36 (24%), p < 0.0001; dissection: OA 13 (10.9%) vs non-OA 2 (1.3%); p = 0.0007). OA patients had less perioperative stroke (1 (1%) vs 15 (10%), p = 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (9 vs 12 days, p = 0.0004). There were no differences in the mortality (in-hospital: OA 8 (7%) vs non-OA 8 (5%); p = 0.6; death at follow-up: OA 5 (5%) vs non-OA 15 (11%); p = 0.1). Overall valve performance showed a well-functioning valve in 97.3% at follow-up. CONCLUSION: The valve performance showed excellent results regardless of the initial indication. The incidence of stroke was lower in patients receiving an open arch anastomosis using unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion without elevated mortality or prolonged hospital stay. BioMed Central 2021-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8234670/ /pubmed/34174918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01562-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zientara, Alicja
Rosselet-Droux, Kim
Bruijnen, Hans
Odavic, Dragan
Genoni, Michele
Dzemali, Omer
Freestyle aortic root prosthesis in combination with aortic replacement and open anastomosis: a retrospective analysis
title Freestyle aortic root prosthesis in combination with aortic replacement and open anastomosis: a retrospective analysis
title_full Freestyle aortic root prosthesis in combination with aortic replacement and open anastomosis: a retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Freestyle aortic root prosthesis in combination with aortic replacement and open anastomosis: a retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Freestyle aortic root prosthesis in combination with aortic replacement and open anastomosis: a retrospective analysis
title_short Freestyle aortic root prosthesis in combination with aortic replacement and open anastomosis: a retrospective analysis
title_sort freestyle aortic root prosthesis in combination with aortic replacement and open anastomosis: a retrospective analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8234670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34174918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01562-3
work_keys_str_mv AT zientaraalicja freestyleaorticrootprosthesisincombinationwithaorticreplacementandopenanastomosisaretrospectiveanalysis
AT rosseletdrouxkim freestyleaorticrootprosthesisincombinationwithaorticreplacementandopenanastomosisaretrospectiveanalysis
AT bruijnenhans freestyleaorticrootprosthesisincombinationwithaorticreplacementandopenanastomosisaretrospectiveanalysis
AT odavicdragan freestyleaorticrootprosthesisincombinationwithaorticreplacementandopenanastomosisaretrospectiveanalysis
AT genonimichele freestyleaorticrootprosthesisincombinationwithaorticreplacementandopenanastomosisaretrospectiveanalysis
AT dzemaliomer freestyleaorticrootprosthesisincombinationwithaorticreplacementandopenanastomosisaretrospectiveanalysis