Cargando…

Individual Revision Knee Arthroplasty Is a Safe Limb Salvage Procedure

Introduction: Revision total knee arthroplasty after multiple pre-surgeries is challenging. Due to severe bone defects, standard implants for metaphyseal and diaphyseal anchoring may no longer be suitable. The primary aim of this case series is to evaluate the early complication rate for individual...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Savov, Peter, Tuecking, Lars-Rene, Windhagen, Henning, Ettinger, Max
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8234866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34207165
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11060572
_version_ 1783714182626017280
author Savov, Peter
Tuecking, Lars-Rene
Windhagen, Henning
Ettinger, Max
author_facet Savov, Peter
Tuecking, Lars-Rene
Windhagen, Henning
Ettinger, Max
author_sort Savov, Peter
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Revision total knee arthroplasty after multiple pre-surgeries is challenging. Due to severe bone defects, standard implants for metaphyseal and diaphyseal anchoring may no longer be suitable. The primary aim of this case series is to evaluate the early complication rate for individual knee implants with custom-made cones and stems after two-stage revision with severe bone defects. Methods: Ten patients who were treated with custom-made 3D-printed knee revision implants were included. Inclusion criteria were a two-stage revision due to late-onset or chronic periprosthetic joint infection as well as aseptic loosening. All severe bone defects were AORI type III. All procedure-related complications were evaluated. Postoperative range of motion after one year was measured. The time between the two surgeries was evaluated. Results: The mean follow-up was 21 months (range: 12–40). The mean time between the two-stage surgeries was 71.6 days. No fractures were observed intra- and postoperatively. Two patients were revised without changing metal components due to persistent hematoma (three weeks post-surgery) and persistent PJI (three months post-surgery). The mean passive postoperative range of motion was 92° (range: 80–110°). Conclusions: Individual custom-made implants for rTKA provide a safe procedure for patients with huge bone defects after several pre-surgeries. If standard knee systems with standard cones or sleeves are not suitable anymore, custom-made treatment offers the patient the last option for limb preservation. However, this is associated with increased costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8234866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82348662021-06-27 Individual Revision Knee Arthroplasty Is a Safe Limb Salvage Procedure Savov, Peter Tuecking, Lars-Rene Windhagen, Henning Ettinger, Max J Pers Med Article Introduction: Revision total knee arthroplasty after multiple pre-surgeries is challenging. Due to severe bone defects, standard implants for metaphyseal and diaphyseal anchoring may no longer be suitable. The primary aim of this case series is to evaluate the early complication rate for individual knee implants with custom-made cones and stems after two-stage revision with severe bone defects. Methods: Ten patients who were treated with custom-made 3D-printed knee revision implants were included. Inclusion criteria were a two-stage revision due to late-onset or chronic periprosthetic joint infection as well as aseptic loosening. All severe bone defects were AORI type III. All procedure-related complications were evaluated. Postoperative range of motion after one year was measured. The time between the two surgeries was evaluated. Results: The mean follow-up was 21 months (range: 12–40). The mean time between the two-stage surgeries was 71.6 days. No fractures were observed intra- and postoperatively. Two patients were revised without changing metal components due to persistent hematoma (three weeks post-surgery) and persistent PJI (three months post-surgery). The mean passive postoperative range of motion was 92° (range: 80–110°). Conclusions: Individual custom-made implants for rTKA provide a safe procedure for patients with huge bone defects after several pre-surgeries. If standard knee systems with standard cones or sleeves are not suitable anymore, custom-made treatment offers the patient the last option for limb preservation. However, this is associated with increased costs. MDPI 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8234866/ /pubmed/34207165 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11060572 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Savov, Peter
Tuecking, Lars-Rene
Windhagen, Henning
Ettinger, Max
Individual Revision Knee Arthroplasty Is a Safe Limb Salvage Procedure
title Individual Revision Knee Arthroplasty Is a Safe Limb Salvage Procedure
title_full Individual Revision Knee Arthroplasty Is a Safe Limb Salvage Procedure
title_fullStr Individual Revision Knee Arthroplasty Is a Safe Limb Salvage Procedure
title_full_unstemmed Individual Revision Knee Arthroplasty Is a Safe Limb Salvage Procedure
title_short Individual Revision Knee Arthroplasty Is a Safe Limb Salvage Procedure
title_sort individual revision knee arthroplasty is a safe limb salvage procedure
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8234866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34207165
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11060572
work_keys_str_mv AT savovpeter individualrevisionkneearthroplastyisasafelimbsalvageprocedure
AT tueckinglarsrene individualrevisionkneearthroplastyisasafelimbsalvageprocedure
AT windhagenhenning individualrevisionkneearthroplastyisasafelimbsalvageprocedure
AT ettingermax individualrevisionkneearthroplastyisasafelimbsalvageprocedure