Cargando…
Response Prediction and Evaluation Using PET in Patients with Solid Tumors Treated with Immunotherapy
SIMPLE SUMMARY: In cancer treatment, immunotherapy is increasingly becoming important as a component of first-line treatment and has improved the prognosis of patients since its introduction. A large group of patients, however, do not respond to immunotherapy, and predicting a treatment response rem...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8234914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34205572 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13123083 |
_version_ | 1783714193584685056 |
---|---|
author | Borm, Frank J. Smit, Jasper Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. Wondergem, Maurits Haanen, John B. A. G. Smit, Egbert F. de Langen, Adrianus J. |
author_facet | Borm, Frank J. Smit, Jasper Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. Wondergem, Maurits Haanen, John B. A. G. Smit, Egbert F. de Langen, Adrianus J. |
author_sort | Borm, Frank J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: In cancer treatment, immunotherapy is increasingly becoming important as a component of first-line treatment and has improved the prognosis of patients since its introduction. A large group of patients, however, do not respond to immunotherapy, and predicting a treatment response remains challenging. Furthermore, evaluating a response using conventional computed tomography (CT) scans is not straightforward due to the different mechanism of action of immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy. This review provides an overview of positron emission tomography (PET) in predicting and evaluating treatment response to immunotherapy. ABSTRACT: In multiple malignancies, checkpoint inhibitor therapy has an established role in the first-line treatment setting. However, only a subset of patients benefit from checkpoint inhibition, and as a result, the field of biomarker research is active. Molecular imaging with the use of positron emission tomography (PET) is one of the biomarkers that is being studied. PET tracers such as conventional (18)F-FDG but also PD-(L)1 directed tracers are being evaluated for their predictive power. Furthermore, the use of artificial intelligence is under evaluation for the purpose of response prediction. Response evaluation during checkpoint inhibitor therapy can be challenging due to the different response patterns that can be observed compared to traditional chemotherapy. The additional information provided by PET can potentially be of value to evaluate a response early after the start of treatment and provide the clinician with important information about the efficacy of immunotherapy. Furthermore, the use of PET to stratify between patients with a complete response and those with a residual disease can potentially guide clinicians to identify patients for which immunotherapy can be discontinued and patients for whom the treatment needs to be escalated. This review provides an overview of the use of positron emission tomography (PET) to predict and evaluate treatment response to immunotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8234914 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82349142021-06-27 Response Prediction and Evaluation Using PET in Patients with Solid Tumors Treated with Immunotherapy Borm, Frank J. Smit, Jasper Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. Wondergem, Maurits Haanen, John B. A. G. Smit, Egbert F. de Langen, Adrianus J. Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: In cancer treatment, immunotherapy is increasingly becoming important as a component of first-line treatment and has improved the prognosis of patients since its introduction. A large group of patients, however, do not respond to immunotherapy, and predicting a treatment response remains challenging. Furthermore, evaluating a response using conventional computed tomography (CT) scans is not straightforward due to the different mechanism of action of immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy. This review provides an overview of positron emission tomography (PET) in predicting and evaluating treatment response to immunotherapy. ABSTRACT: In multiple malignancies, checkpoint inhibitor therapy has an established role in the first-line treatment setting. However, only a subset of patients benefit from checkpoint inhibition, and as a result, the field of biomarker research is active. Molecular imaging with the use of positron emission tomography (PET) is one of the biomarkers that is being studied. PET tracers such as conventional (18)F-FDG but also PD-(L)1 directed tracers are being evaluated for their predictive power. Furthermore, the use of artificial intelligence is under evaluation for the purpose of response prediction. Response evaluation during checkpoint inhibitor therapy can be challenging due to the different response patterns that can be observed compared to traditional chemotherapy. The additional information provided by PET can potentially be of value to evaluate a response early after the start of treatment and provide the clinician with important information about the efficacy of immunotherapy. Furthermore, the use of PET to stratify between patients with a complete response and those with a residual disease can potentially guide clinicians to identify patients for which immunotherapy can be discontinued and patients for whom the treatment needs to be escalated. This review provides an overview of the use of positron emission tomography (PET) to predict and evaluate treatment response to immunotherapy. MDPI 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8234914/ /pubmed/34205572 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13123083 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Borm, Frank J. Smit, Jasper Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. Wondergem, Maurits Haanen, John B. A. G. Smit, Egbert F. de Langen, Adrianus J. Response Prediction and Evaluation Using PET in Patients with Solid Tumors Treated with Immunotherapy |
title | Response Prediction and Evaluation Using PET in Patients with Solid Tumors Treated with Immunotherapy |
title_full | Response Prediction and Evaluation Using PET in Patients with Solid Tumors Treated with Immunotherapy |
title_fullStr | Response Prediction and Evaluation Using PET in Patients with Solid Tumors Treated with Immunotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Response Prediction and Evaluation Using PET in Patients with Solid Tumors Treated with Immunotherapy |
title_short | Response Prediction and Evaluation Using PET in Patients with Solid Tumors Treated with Immunotherapy |
title_sort | response prediction and evaluation using pet in patients with solid tumors treated with immunotherapy |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8234914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34205572 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13123083 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bormfrankj responsepredictionandevaluationusingpetinpatientswithsolidtumorstreatedwithimmunotherapy AT smitjasper responsepredictionandevaluationusingpetinpatientswithsolidtumorstreatedwithimmunotherapy AT oprealagerdanielae responsepredictionandevaluationusingpetinpatientswithsolidtumorstreatedwithimmunotherapy AT wondergemmaurits responsepredictionandevaluationusingpetinpatientswithsolidtumorstreatedwithimmunotherapy AT haanenjohnbag responsepredictionandevaluationusingpetinpatientswithsolidtumorstreatedwithimmunotherapy AT smitegbertf responsepredictionandevaluationusingpetinpatientswithsolidtumorstreatedwithimmunotherapy AT delangenadrianusj responsepredictionandevaluationusingpetinpatientswithsolidtumorstreatedwithimmunotherapy |