Cargando…
Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog Mandibles
Acute-type lateral ridge defects (25 mm × 6 mm × 5 mm) were bilaterally created in the mandibles of four dogs (two defects per animal). The defects were reconstructed with particulate autologous bone and covered with a microperforated titanium membrane (Ti-honeycomb membrane, TiHM) or an existing co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8234924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34204390 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14123358 |
_version_ | 1783714196049887232 |
---|---|
author | Hasegawa, Hiroshi Kaneko, Tetsuharu Endo, Manabu Kanno, Chihiro Yamazaki, Morio Yaginuma, Sadanoshin Igarashi, Hiroki Honma, Hideaki Masui, Seiichiro Suto, Mizuki Sakisaka, Yukihiko Ishihata, Hiroshi |
author_facet | Hasegawa, Hiroshi Kaneko, Tetsuharu Endo, Manabu Kanno, Chihiro Yamazaki, Morio Yaginuma, Sadanoshin Igarashi, Hiroki Honma, Hideaki Masui, Seiichiro Suto, Mizuki Sakisaka, Yukihiko Ishihata, Hiroshi |
author_sort | Hasegawa, Hiroshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Acute-type lateral ridge defects (25 mm × 6 mm × 5 mm) were bilaterally created in the mandibles of four dogs (two defects per animal). The defects were reconstructed with particulate autologous bone and covered with a microperforated titanium membrane (Ti-honeycomb membrane, TiHM) or an existing conventional titanium mesh as control. The samples were dissected after 16 weeks postoperatively and processed for radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric analyses. Regenerated tissue and bone volume were significantly larger in the TiHM group than in the control group (p = 0.05; p = 0.049). In contrast, bone mineral density was similar between the two groups. Histomorphometric analysis revealed that the regenerated bone area and calcific osseous area were larger in the TiHM group than in the control group; however, the differences were not significant. The efficacy of TiHM was generally satisfactory with the potential to become a standard tool for the GBR procedure; however, early membrane exposure will be a major problem to overcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8234924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82349242021-06-27 Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog Mandibles Hasegawa, Hiroshi Kaneko, Tetsuharu Endo, Manabu Kanno, Chihiro Yamazaki, Morio Yaginuma, Sadanoshin Igarashi, Hiroki Honma, Hideaki Masui, Seiichiro Suto, Mizuki Sakisaka, Yukihiko Ishihata, Hiroshi Materials (Basel) Article Acute-type lateral ridge defects (25 mm × 6 mm × 5 mm) were bilaterally created in the mandibles of four dogs (two defects per animal). The defects were reconstructed with particulate autologous bone and covered with a microperforated titanium membrane (Ti-honeycomb membrane, TiHM) or an existing conventional titanium mesh as control. The samples were dissected after 16 weeks postoperatively and processed for radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric analyses. Regenerated tissue and bone volume were significantly larger in the TiHM group than in the control group (p = 0.05; p = 0.049). In contrast, bone mineral density was similar between the two groups. Histomorphometric analysis revealed that the regenerated bone area and calcific osseous area were larger in the TiHM group than in the control group; however, the differences were not significant. The efficacy of TiHM was generally satisfactory with the potential to become a standard tool for the GBR procedure; however, early membrane exposure will be a major problem to overcome. MDPI 2021-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8234924/ /pubmed/34204390 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14123358 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hasegawa, Hiroshi Kaneko, Tetsuharu Endo, Manabu Kanno, Chihiro Yamazaki, Morio Yaginuma, Sadanoshin Igarashi, Hiroki Honma, Hideaki Masui, Seiichiro Suto, Mizuki Sakisaka, Yukihiko Ishihata, Hiroshi Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog Mandibles |
title | Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog Mandibles |
title_full | Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog Mandibles |
title_fullStr | Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog Mandibles |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog Mandibles |
title_short | Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog Mandibles |
title_sort | comparing the efficacy of a microperforated titanium membrane for guided bone regeneration with an existing mesh retainer in dog mandibles |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8234924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34204390 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14123358 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hasegawahiroshi comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles AT kanekotetsuharu comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles AT endomanabu comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles AT kannochihiro comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles AT yamazakimorio comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles AT yaginumasadanoshin comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles AT igarashihiroki comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles AT honmahideaki comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles AT masuiseiichiro comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles AT sutomizuki comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles AT sakisakayukihiko comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles AT ishihatahiroshi comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles |