Cargando…

Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog Mandibles

Acute-type lateral ridge defects (25 mm × 6 mm × 5 mm) were bilaterally created in the mandibles of four dogs (two defects per animal). The defects were reconstructed with particulate autologous bone and covered with a microperforated titanium membrane (Ti-honeycomb membrane, TiHM) or an existing co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasegawa, Hiroshi, Kaneko, Tetsuharu, Endo, Manabu, Kanno, Chihiro, Yamazaki, Morio, Yaginuma, Sadanoshin, Igarashi, Hiroki, Honma, Hideaki, Masui, Seiichiro, Suto, Mizuki, Sakisaka, Yukihiko, Ishihata, Hiroshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8234924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34204390
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14123358
_version_ 1783714196049887232
author Hasegawa, Hiroshi
Kaneko, Tetsuharu
Endo, Manabu
Kanno, Chihiro
Yamazaki, Morio
Yaginuma, Sadanoshin
Igarashi, Hiroki
Honma, Hideaki
Masui, Seiichiro
Suto, Mizuki
Sakisaka, Yukihiko
Ishihata, Hiroshi
author_facet Hasegawa, Hiroshi
Kaneko, Tetsuharu
Endo, Manabu
Kanno, Chihiro
Yamazaki, Morio
Yaginuma, Sadanoshin
Igarashi, Hiroki
Honma, Hideaki
Masui, Seiichiro
Suto, Mizuki
Sakisaka, Yukihiko
Ishihata, Hiroshi
author_sort Hasegawa, Hiroshi
collection PubMed
description Acute-type lateral ridge defects (25 mm × 6 mm × 5 mm) were bilaterally created in the mandibles of four dogs (two defects per animal). The defects were reconstructed with particulate autologous bone and covered with a microperforated titanium membrane (Ti-honeycomb membrane, TiHM) or an existing conventional titanium mesh as control. The samples were dissected after 16 weeks postoperatively and processed for radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric analyses. Regenerated tissue and bone volume were significantly larger in the TiHM group than in the control group (p = 0.05; p = 0.049). In contrast, bone mineral density was similar between the two groups. Histomorphometric analysis revealed that the regenerated bone area and calcific osseous area were larger in the TiHM group than in the control group; however, the differences were not significant. The efficacy of TiHM was generally satisfactory with the potential to become a standard tool for the GBR procedure; however, early membrane exposure will be a major problem to overcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8234924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82349242021-06-27 Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog Mandibles Hasegawa, Hiroshi Kaneko, Tetsuharu Endo, Manabu Kanno, Chihiro Yamazaki, Morio Yaginuma, Sadanoshin Igarashi, Hiroki Honma, Hideaki Masui, Seiichiro Suto, Mizuki Sakisaka, Yukihiko Ishihata, Hiroshi Materials (Basel) Article Acute-type lateral ridge defects (25 mm × 6 mm × 5 mm) were bilaterally created in the mandibles of four dogs (two defects per animal). The defects were reconstructed with particulate autologous bone and covered with a microperforated titanium membrane (Ti-honeycomb membrane, TiHM) or an existing conventional titanium mesh as control. The samples were dissected after 16 weeks postoperatively and processed for radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric analyses. Regenerated tissue and bone volume were significantly larger in the TiHM group than in the control group (p = 0.05; p = 0.049). In contrast, bone mineral density was similar between the two groups. Histomorphometric analysis revealed that the regenerated bone area and calcific osseous area were larger in the TiHM group than in the control group; however, the differences were not significant. The efficacy of TiHM was generally satisfactory with the potential to become a standard tool for the GBR procedure; however, early membrane exposure will be a major problem to overcome. MDPI 2021-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8234924/ /pubmed/34204390 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14123358 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hasegawa, Hiroshi
Kaneko, Tetsuharu
Endo, Manabu
Kanno, Chihiro
Yamazaki, Morio
Yaginuma, Sadanoshin
Igarashi, Hiroki
Honma, Hideaki
Masui, Seiichiro
Suto, Mizuki
Sakisaka, Yukihiko
Ishihata, Hiroshi
Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog Mandibles
title Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog Mandibles
title_full Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog Mandibles
title_fullStr Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog Mandibles
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog Mandibles
title_short Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog Mandibles
title_sort comparing the efficacy of a microperforated titanium membrane for guided bone regeneration with an existing mesh retainer in dog mandibles
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8234924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34204390
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14123358
work_keys_str_mv AT hasegawahiroshi comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles
AT kanekotetsuharu comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles
AT endomanabu comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles
AT kannochihiro comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles
AT yamazakimorio comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles
AT yaginumasadanoshin comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles
AT igarashihiroki comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles
AT honmahideaki comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles
AT masuiseiichiro comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles
AT sutomizuki comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles
AT sakisakayukihiko comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles
AT ishihatahiroshi comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles