Cargando…

Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Central Pain Sensitization Syndromes: A Systematic Review

Objectives: Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is considered by the American Psychological Association as an evidence-based treatment for a variety of disorders, including chronic pain. The main objective of the present systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of ACT in patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Galvez-Sánchez, Carmen M., Montoro, Casandra I., Moreno-Padilla, María, Reyes del Paso, Gustavo A., de la Coba, Pablo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8235706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34205244
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122706
_version_ 1783714381181222912
author Galvez-Sánchez, Carmen M.
Montoro, Casandra I.
Moreno-Padilla, María
Reyes del Paso, Gustavo A.
de la Coba, Pablo
author_facet Galvez-Sánchez, Carmen M.
Montoro, Casandra I.
Moreno-Padilla, María
Reyes del Paso, Gustavo A.
de la Coba, Pablo
author_sort Galvez-Sánchez, Carmen M.
collection PubMed
description Objectives: Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is considered by the American Psychological Association as an evidence-based treatment for a variety of disorders, including chronic pain. The main objective of the present systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of ACT in patients with central pain sensitization syndromes (CPSS). Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration and PRISMA statements. The protocol was registered in advance in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) international database. The selected articles were evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias (ROB) assessment tool. The PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched. Results: The literature search identified 21 studies (including investigations of fibromyalgia syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, and migraine) eligible for the systematic review. There were no studies regarding the effectiveness of ACT for chronic tension-type headache (CTTH), interstitial cystitis (IC), or temporomandibular disorder (TMD). The evaluation of ROB showed that 12 of the selected studies were of low quality, 5 were of moderate quality, and 4 were high quality. ACT reduces some clinical symptoms, such as anxiety, depression, and pain. This positive effect of ACT might be mediated by pain acceptance, psychological flexibility, optimism, self-efficacy, or adherence to values. ACT showed better results in comparison to non-intervention (e.g., “waiting list”) conditions, as well as pharmacological and psychoeducational interventions. It is not entirely clear whether extended ACT treatments are more advantageous than briefer interventions. Conclusions: There are few studies about the effectiveness of ACT on CPSS. However, ACT seems to reduce subjective CPSS symptoms and improve the health-related quality of life of these patients. The absence of studies on the effectiveness of ACT in CTTH, IC, and TMD, indicate the pressing need for further ACT studies in these CPSS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8235706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82357062021-06-27 Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Central Pain Sensitization Syndromes: A Systematic Review Galvez-Sánchez, Carmen M. Montoro, Casandra I. Moreno-Padilla, María Reyes del Paso, Gustavo A. de la Coba, Pablo J Clin Med Review Objectives: Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is considered by the American Psychological Association as an evidence-based treatment for a variety of disorders, including chronic pain. The main objective of the present systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of ACT in patients with central pain sensitization syndromes (CPSS). Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration and PRISMA statements. The protocol was registered in advance in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) international database. The selected articles were evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias (ROB) assessment tool. The PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched. Results: The literature search identified 21 studies (including investigations of fibromyalgia syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, and migraine) eligible for the systematic review. There were no studies regarding the effectiveness of ACT for chronic tension-type headache (CTTH), interstitial cystitis (IC), or temporomandibular disorder (TMD). The evaluation of ROB showed that 12 of the selected studies were of low quality, 5 were of moderate quality, and 4 were high quality. ACT reduces some clinical symptoms, such as anxiety, depression, and pain. This positive effect of ACT might be mediated by pain acceptance, psychological flexibility, optimism, self-efficacy, or adherence to values. ACT showed better results in comparison to non-intervention (e.g., “waiting list”) conditions, as well as pharmacological and psychoeducational interventions. It is not entirely clear whether extended ACT treatments are more advantageous than briefer interventions. Conclusions: There are few studies about the effectiveness of ACT on CPSS. However, ACT seems to reduce subjective CPSS symptoms and improve the health-related quality of life of these patients. The absence of studies on the effectiveness of ACT in CTTH, IC, and TMD, indicate the pressing need for further ACT studies in these CPSS. MDPI 2021-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8235706/ /pubmed/34205244 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122706 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Galvez-Sánchez, Carmen M.
Montoro, Casandra I.
Moreno-Padilla, María
Reyes del Paso, Gustavo A.
de la Coba, Pablo
Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Central Pain Sensitization Syndromes: A Systematic Review
title Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Central Pain Sensitization Syndromes: A Systematic Review
title_full Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Central Pain Sensitization Syndromes: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Central Pain Sensitization Syndromes: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Central Pain Sensitization Syndromes: A Systematic Review
title_short Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Central Pain Sensitization Syndromes: A Systematic Review
title_sort effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy in central pain sensitization syndromes: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8235706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34205244
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122706
work_keys_str_mv AT galvezsanchezcarmenm effectivenessofacceptanceandcommitmenttherapyincentralpainsensitizationsyndromesasystematicreview
AT montorocasandrai effectivenessofacceptanceandcommitmenttherapyincentralpainsensitizationsyndromesasystematicreview
AT morenopadillamaria effectivenessofacceptanceandcommitmenttherapyincentralpainsensitizationsyndromesasystematicreview
AT reyesdelpasogustavoa effectivenessofacceptanceandcommitmenttherapyincentralpainsensitizationsyndromesasystematicreview
AT delacobapablo effectivenessofacceptanceandcommitmenttherapyincentralpainsensitizationsyndromesasystematicreview