Cargando…
Wild Small Mammals and Ticks in Zoos—Reservoir of Agents with Zoonotic Potential?
Wild small mammals and ticks play an important role in maintaining and spreading zoonoses in nature, as well as in captive animals. The aim of this study was to monitor selected agents with zoonotic potential in their reservoirs and vectors in a zoo, and to draw attention to the risk of possible con...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8235793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34205547 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060777 |
_version_ | 1783714402016428032 |
---|---|
author | Pittermannová, Pavlína Žákovská, Alena Váňa, Petr Marková, Jiřina Treml, František Černíková, Lenka Budíková, Marie Bártová, Eva |
author_facet | Pittermannová, Pavlína Žákovská, Alena Váňa, Petr Marková, Jiřina Treml, František Černíková, Lenka Budíková, Marie Bártová, Eva |
author_sort | Pittermannová, Pavlína |
collection | PubMed |
description | Wild small mammals and ticks play an important role in maintaining and spreading zoonoses in nature, as well as in captive animals. The aim of this study was to monitor selected agents with zoonotic potential in their reservoirs and vectors in a zoo, and to draw attention to the risk of possible contact with these pathogens. In total, 117 wild small mammals (rodents) and 166 ticks were collected in the area of Brno Zoo. Antibodies to the bacteria Coxiella burnetii, Francisella tularensis, and Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. were detected by a modified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 19% (19/99), 4% (4/99), and 15% (15/99) of rodents, respectively. Antibodies to Leptospira spp. bacteria were detected by the microscopic agglutination test in 6% (4/63) of rodents. Coinfection (antibodies to more than two agents) were proved in 14.5% (15/97) of animals. The prevalence of C. burnetii statistically differed according to the years of trapping (p = 0.0241). The DNAs of B. burgdorferi s.l., Rickettsia sp., and Anaplasma phagocytophilum were detected by PCR in 16%, 6%, and 1% of ticks, respectively, without coinfection and without effect of life stage and sex of ticks on positivity. Sequencing showed homology with R. helvetica and A. phagocytophilum in four and one positive samples, respectively. The results of our study show that wild small mammals and ticks in a zoo could serve as reservoirs and vectors of infectious agents with zoonotic potential and thus present a risk of infection to zoo animals and also to keepers and visitors to a zoo. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8235793 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82357932021-06-27 Wild Small Mammals and Ticks in Zoos—Reservoir of Agents with Zoonotic Potential? Pittermannová, Pavlína Žákovská, Alena Váňa, Petr Marková, Jiřina Treml, František Černíková, Lenka Budíková, Marie Bártová, Eva Pathogens Article Wild small mammals and ticks play an important role in maintaining and spreading zoonoses in nature, as well as in captive animals. The aim of this study was to monitor selected agents with zoonotic potential in their reservoirs and vectors in a zoo, and to draw attention to the risk of possible contact with these pathogens. In total, 117 wild small mammals (rodents) and 166 ticks were collected in the area of Brno Zoo. Antibodies to the bacteria Coxiella burnetii, Francisella tularensis, and Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. were detected by a modified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 19% (19/99), 4% (4/99), and 15% (15/99) of rodents, respectively. Antibodies to Leptospira spp. bacteria were detected by the microscopic agglutination test in 6% (4/63) of rodents. Coinfection (antibodies to more than two agents) were proved in 14.5% (15/97) of animals. The prevalence of C. burnetii statistically differed according to the years of trapping (p = 0.0241). The DNAs of B. burgdorferi s.l., Rickettsia sp., and Anaplasma phagocytophilum were detected by PCR in 16%, 6%, and 1% of ticks, respectively, without coinfection and without effect of life stage and sex of ticks on positivity. Sequencing showed homology with R. helvetica and A. phagocytophilum in four and one positive samples, respectively. The results of our study show that wild small mammals and ticks in a zoo could serve as reservoirs and vectors of infectious agents with zoonotic potential and thus present a risk of infection to zoo animals and also to keepers and visitors to a zoo. MDPI 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8235793/ /pubmed/34205547 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060777 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pittermannová, Pavlína Žákovská, Alena Váňa, Petr Marková, Jiřina Treml, František Černíková, Lenka Budíková, Marie Bártová, Eva Wild Small Mammals and Ticks in Zoos—Reservoir of Agents with Zoonotic Potential? |
title | Wild Small Mammals and Ticks in Zoos—Reservoir of Agents with Zoonotic Potential? |
title_full | Wild Small Mammals and Ticks in Zoos—Reservoir of Agents with Zoonotic Potential? |
title_fullStr | Wild Small Mammals and Ticks in Zoos—Reservoir of Agents with Zoonotic Potential? |
title_full_unstemmed | Wild Small Mammals and Ticks in Zoos—Reservoir of Agents with Zoonotic Potential? |
title_short | Wild Small Mammals and Ticks in Zoos—Reservoir of Agents with Zoonotic Potential? |
title_sort | wild small mammals and ticks in zoos—reservoir of agents with zoonotic potential? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8235793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34205547 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060777 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pittermannovapavlina wildsmallmammalsandticksinzoosreservoirofagentswithzoonoticpotential AT zakovskaalena wildsmallmammalsandticksinzoosreservoirofagentswithzoonoticpotential AT vanapetr wildsmallmammalsandticksinzoosreservoirofagentswithzoonoticpotential AT markovajirina wildsmallmammalsandticksinzoosreservoirofagentswithzoonoticpotential AT tremlfrantisek wildsmallmammalsandticksinzoosreservoirofagentswithzoonoticpotential AT cernikovalenka wildsmallmammalsandticksinzoosreservoirofagentswithzoonoticpotential AT budikovamarie wildsmallmammalsandticksinzoosreservoirofagentswithzoonoticpotential AT bartovaeva wildsmallmammalsandticksinzoosreservoirofagentswithzoonoticpotential |