Cargando…

Wild Small Mammals and Ticks in Zoos—Reservoir of Agents with Zoonotic Potential?

Wild small mammals and ticks play an important role in maintaining and spreading zoonoses in nature, as well as in captive animals. The aim of this study was to monitor selected agents with zoonotic potential in their reservoirs and vectors in a zoo, and to draw attention to the risk of possible con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pittermannová, Pavlína, Žákovská, Alena, Váňa, Petr, Marková, Jiřina, Treml, František, Černíková, Lenka, Budíková, Marie, Bártová, Eva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8235793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34205547
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060777
_version_ 1783714402016428032
author Pittermannová, Pavlína
Žákovská, Alena
Váňa, Petr
Marková, Jiřina
Treml, František
Černíková, Lenka
Budíková, Marie
Bártová, Eva
author_facet Pittermannová, Pavlína
Žákovská, Alena
Váňa, Petr
Marková, Jiřina
Treml, František
Černíková, Lenka
Budíková, Marie
Bártová, Eva
author_sort Pittermannová, Pavlína
collection PubMed
description Wild small mammals and ticks play an important role in maintaining and spreading zoonoses in nature, as well as in captive animals. The aim of this study was to monitor selected agents with zoonotic potential in their reservoirs and vectors in a zoo, and to draw attention to the risk of possible contact with these pathogens. In total, 117 wild small mammals (rodents) and 166 ticks were collected in the area of Brno Zoo. Antibodies to the bacteria Coxiella burnetii, Francisella tularensis, and Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. were detected by a modified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 19% (19/99), 4% (4/99), and 15% (15/99) of rodents, respectively. Antibodies to Leptospira spp. bacteria were detected by the microscopic agglutination test in 6% (4/63) of rodents. Coinfection (antibodies to more than two agents) were proved in 14.5% (15/97) of animals. The prevalence of C. burnetii statistically differed according to the years of trapping (p = 0.0241). The DNAs of B. burgdorferi s.l., Rickettsia sp., and Anaplasma phagocytophilum were detected by PCR in 16%, 6%, and 1% of ticks, respectively, without coinfection and without effect of life stage and sex of ticks on positivity. Sequencing showed homology with R. helvetica and A. phagocytophilum in four and one positive samples, respectively. The results of our study show that wild small mammals and ticks in a zoo could serve as reservoirs and vectors of infectious agents with zoonotic potential and thus present a risk of infection to zoo animals and also to keepers and visitors to a zoo.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8235793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82357932021-06-27 Wild Small Mammals and Ticks in Zoos—Reservoir of Agents with Zoonotic Potential? Pittermannová, Pavlína Žákovská, Alena Váňa, Petr Marková, Jiřina Treml, František Černíková, Lenka Budíková, Marie Bártová, Eva Pathogens Article Wild small mammals and ticks play an important role in maintaining and spreading zoonoses in nature, as well as in captive animals. The aim of this study was to monitor selected agents with zoonotic potential in their reservoirs and vectors in a zoo, and to draw attention to the risk of possible contact with these pathogens. In total, 117 wild small mammals (rodents) and 166 ticks were collected in the area of Brno Zoo. Antibodies to the bacteria Coxiella burnetii, Francisella tularensis, and Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. were detected by a modified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 19% (19/99), 4% (4/99), and 15% (15/99) of rodents, respectively. Antibodies to Leptospira spp. bacteria were detected by the microscopic agglutination test in 6% (4/63) of rodents. Coinfection (antibodies to more than two agents) were proved in 14.5% (15/97) of animals. The prevalence of C. burnetii statistically differed according to the years of trapping (p = 0.0241). The DNAs of B. burgdorferi s.l., Rickettsia sp., and Anaplasma phagocytophilum were detected by PCR in 16%, 6%, and 1% of ticks, respectively, without coinfection and without effect of life stage and sex of ticks on positivity. Sequencing showed homology with R. helvetica and A. phagocytophilum in four and one positive samples, respectively. The results of our study show that wild small mammals and ticks in a zoo could serve as reservoirs and vectors of infectious agents with zoonotic potential and thus present a risk of infection to zoo animals and also to keepers and visitors to a zoo. MDPI 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8235793/ /pubmed/34205547 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060777 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pittermannová, Pavlína
Žákovská, Alena
Váňa, Petr
Marková, Jiřina
Treml, František
Černíková, Lenka
Budíková, Marie
Bártová, Eva
Wild Small Mammals and Ticks in Zoos—Reservoir of Agents with Zoonotic Potential?
title Wild Small Mammals and Ticks in Zoos—Reservoir of Agents with Zoonotic Potential?
title_full Wild Small Mammals and Ticks in Zoos—Reservoir of Agents with Zoonotic Potential?
title_fullStr Wild Small Mammals and Ticks in Zoos—Reservoir of Agents with Zoonotic Potential?
title_full_unstemmed Wild Small Mammals and Ticks in Zoos—Reservoir of Agents with Zoonotic Potential?
title_short Wild Small Mammals and Ticks in Zoos—Reservoir of Agents with Zoonotic Potential?
title_sort wild small mammals and ticks in zoos—reservoir of agents with zoonotic potential?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8235793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34205547
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060777
work_keys_str_mv AT pittermannovapavlina wildsmallmammalsandticksinzoosreservoirofagentswithzoonoticpotential
AT zakovskaalena wildsmallmammalsandticksinzoosreservoirofagentswithzoonoticpotential
AT vanapetr wildsmallmammalsandticksinzoosreservoirofagentswithzoonoticpotential
AT markovajirina wildsmallmammalsandticksinzoosreservoirofagentswithzoonoticpotential
AT tremlfrantisek wildsmallmammalsandticksinzoosreservoirofagentswithzoonoticpotential
AT cernikovalenka wildsmallmammalsandticksinzoosreservoirofagentswithzoonoticpotential
AT budikovamarie wildsmallmammalsandticksinzoosreservoirofagentswithzoonoticpotential
AT bartovaeva wildsmallmammalsandticksinzoosreservoirofagentswithzoonoticpotential