Cargando…

Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two Methods

Two DFT-based methods using hybrid functionals and plane-averaged profiles of the Hartree potential (individual slabs versus vacuum and alternating slabs of both materials), which are frequently used to predict or estimate the offset between bands at interfaces between two semiconductors, are analyz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Conesa, José C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8235794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34208486
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11061581
_version_ 1783714402270183424
author Conesa, José C.
author_facet Conesa, José C.
author_sort Conesa, José C.
collection PubMed
description Two DFT-based methods using hybrid functionals and plane-averaged profiles of the Hartree potential (individual slabs versus vacuum and alternating slabs of both materials), which are frequently used to predict or estimate the offset between bands at interfaces between two semiconductors, are analyzed in the present work. These methods are compared using several very different semiconductor pairs, and the conclusions about the advantages of each method are discussed. Overall, the alternating slabs method is recommended in those cases where epitaxial mismatch does not represent a significant problem.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8235794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82357942021-06-27 Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two Methods Conesa, José C. Nanomaterials (Basel) Article Two DFT-based methods using hybrid functionals and plane-averaged profiles of the Hartree potential (individual slabs versus vacuum and alternating slabs of both materials), which are frequently used to predict or estimate the offset between bands at interfaces between two semiconductors, are analyzed in the present work. These methods are compared using several very different semiconductor pairs, and the conclusions about the advantages of each method are discussed. Overall, the alternating slabs method is recommended in those cases where epitaxial mismatch does not represent a significant problem. MDPI 2021-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8235794/ /pubmed/34208486 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11061581 Text en © 2021 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Conesa, José C.
Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two Methods
title Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two Methods
title_full Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two Methods
title_fullStr Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two Methods
title_full_unstemmed Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two Methods
title_short Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two Methods
title_sort computing with dft band offsets at semiconductor interfaces: a comparison of two methods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8235794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34208486
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11061581
work_keys_str_mv AT conesajosec computingwithdftbandoffsetsatsemiconductorinterfacesacomparisonoftwomethods