Cargando…
Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two Methods
Two DFT-based methods using hybrid functionals and plane-averaged profiles of the Hartree potential (individual slabs versus vacuum and alternating slabs of both materials), which are frequently used to predict or estimate the offset between bands at interfaces between two semiconductors, are analyz...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8235794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34208486 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11061581 |
_version_ | 1783714402270183424 |
---|---|
author | Conesa, José C. |
author_facet | Conesa, José C. |
author_sort | Conesa, José C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Two DFT-based methods using hybrid functionals and plane-averaged profiles of the Hartree potential (individual slabs versus vacuum and alternating slabs of both materials), which are frequently used to predict or estimate the offset between bands at interfaces between two semiconductors, are analyzed in the present work. These methods are compared using several very different semiconductor pairs, and the conclusions about the advantages of each method are discussed. Overall, the alternating slabs method is recommended in those cases where epitaxial mismatch does not represent a significant problem. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8235794 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82357942021-06-27 Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two Methods Conesa, José C. Nanomaterials (Basel) Article Two DFT-based methods using hybrid functionals and plane-averaged profiles of the Hartree potential (individual slabs versus vacuum and alternating slabs of both materials), which are frequently used to predict or estimate the offset between bands at interfaces between two semiconductors, are analyzed in the present work. These methods are compared using several very different semiconductor pairs, and the conclusions about the advantages of each method are discussed. Overall, the alternating slabs method is recommended in those cases where epitaxial mismatch does not represent a significant problem. MDPI 2021-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8235794/ /pubmed/34208486 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11061581 Text en © 2021 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Conesa, José C. Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two Methods |
title | Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two Methods |
title_full | Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two Methods |
title_fullStr | Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two Methods |
title_short | Computing with DFT Band Offsets at Semiconductor Interfaces: A Comparison of Two Methods |
title_sort | computing with dft band offsets at semiconductor interfaces: a comparison of two methods |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8235794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34208486 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11061581 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT conesajosec computingwithdftbandoffsetsatsemiconductorinterfacesacomparisonoftwomethods |