Cargando…

Stakeholder perspectives on the implementation and impact of Indigenous health interventions: A systematic review of qualitative studies

BACKGROUND: Evaluations of health interventions for Indigenous peoples rarely report outcomes that reflect participant and community perspectives of their experiences. Inclusion of such data may provide a fuller picture of the impact of health programmes and improve the usefulness of evaluation asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chando, Shingisai, Tong, Allison, Howell, Martin, Dickson, Michelle, Craig, Jonathan C., DeLacy, Jack, Eades, Sandra J., Howard, Kirsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8235882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33729648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13230
_version_ 1783714420766015488
author Chando, Shingisai
Tong, Allison
Howell, Martin
Dickson, Michelle
Craig, Jonathan C.
DeLacy, Jack
Eades, Sandra J.
Howard, Kirsten
author_facet Chando, Shingisai
Tong, Allison
Howell, Martin
Dickson, Michelle
Craig, Jonathan C.
DeLacy, Jack
Eades, Sandra J.
Howard, Kirsten
author_sort Chando, Shingisai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evaluations of health interventions for Indigenous peoples rarely report outcomes that reflect participant and community perspectives of their experiences. Inclusion of such data may provide a fuller picture of the impact of health programmes and improve the usefulness of evaluation assessments. AIM: To describe stakeholder perspectives and experiences of the implementation and impact of Indigenous health programmes. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of qualitative studies evaluating complex health interventions designed for Indigenous communities in high‐income countries. We searched 6 electronic databases (through to January 2020): MEDLINE, PreMEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, EconLit and CINAHL and hand‐searched reference lists of relevant articles. RESULTS: From 28 studies involving 677 stakeholders (mostly clinical staff and participants), six main themes were identified: enabling engagement, regaining control of health, improving social health and belonging, preserving community and culture, cultivating hope for a better life, and threats to long‐term programme viability. CONCLUSION: The prominence of social, emotional and spiritual well‐being as important aspects of the health journey for participants in this review highlights the need to reframe evaluations of health programmes implemented in Indigenous communities away from assessments that focus on commonly used biomedical measures. Evaluators, in consultation with the community, should consistently assess the capacity of health professionals to meet community needs and expectations throughout the life of the programme. Evaluations that include qualitative data on participant and community‐level outcomes can improve decision‐makers' understanding of the impact that health programmes have on communities. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This paper is a review of evaluation studies and did not involve patients or the public.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8235882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82358822021-06-29 Stakeholder perspectives on the implementation and impact of Indigenous health interventions: A systematic review of qualitative studies Chando, Shingisai Tong, Allison Howell, Martin Dickson, Michelle Craig, Jonathan C. DeLacy, Jack Eades, Sandra J. Howard, Kirsten Health Expect Review Articles BACKGROUND: Evaluations of health interventions for Indigenous peoples rarely report outcomes that reflect participant and community perspectives of their experiences. Inclusion of such data may provide a fuller picture of the impact of health programmes and improve the usefulness of evaluation assessments. AIM: To describe stakeholder perspectives and experiences of the implementation and impact of Indigenous health programmes. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of qualitative studies evaluating complex health interventions designed for Indigenous communities in high‐income countries. We searched 6 electronic databases (through to January 2020): MEDLINE, PreMEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, EconLit and CINAHL and hand‐searched reference lists of relevant articles. RESULTS: From 28 studies involving 677 stakeholders (mostly clinical staff and participants), six main themes were identified: enabling engagement, regaining control of health, improving social health and belonging, preserving community and culture, cultivating hope for a better life, and threats to long‐term programme viability. CONCLUSION: The prominence of social, emotional and spiritual well‐being as important aspects of the health journey for participants in this review highlights the need to reframe evaluations of health programmes implemented in Indigenous communities away from assessments that focus on commonly used biomedical measures. Evaluators, in consultation with the community, should consistently assess the capacity of health professionals to meet community needs and expectations throughout the life of the programme. Evaluations that include qualitative data on participant and community‐level outcomes can improve decision‐makers' understanding of the impact that health programmes have on communities. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This paper is a review of evaluation studies and did not involve patients or the public. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-17 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8235882/ /pubmed/33729648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13230 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Chando, Shingisai
Tong, Allison
Howell, Martin
Dickson, Michelle
Craig, Jonathan C.
DeLacy, Jack
Eades, Sandra J.
Howard, Kirsten
Stakeholder perspectives on the implementation and impact of Indigenous health interventions: A systematic review of qualitative studies
title Stakeholder perspectives on the implementation and impact of Indigenous health interventions: A systematic review of qualitative studies
title_full Stakeholder perspectives on the implementation and impact of Indigenous health interventions: A systematic review of qualitative studies
title_fullStr Stakeholder perspectives on the implementation and impact of Indigenous health interventions: A systematic review of qualitative studies
title_full_unstemmed Stakeholder perspectives on the implementation and impact of Indigenous health interventions: A systematic review of qualitative studies
title_short Stakeholder perspectives on the implementation and impact of Indigenous health interventions: A systematic review of qualitative studies
title_sort stakeholder perspectives on the implementation and impact of indigenous health interventions: a systematic review of qualitative studies
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8235882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33729648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13230
work_keys_str_mv AT chandoshingisai stakeholderperspectivesontheimplementationandimpactofindigenoushealthinterventionsasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT tongallison stakeholderperspectivesontheimplementationandimpactofindigenoushealthinterventionsasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT howellmartin stakeholderperspectivesontheimplementationandimpactofindigenoushealthinterventionsasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT dicksonmichelle stakeholderperspectivesontheimplementationandimpactofindigenoushealthinterventionsasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT craigjonathanc stakeholderperspectivesontheimplementationandimpactofindigenoushealthinterventionsasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT delacyjack stakeholderperspectivesontheimplementationandimpactofindigenoushealthinterventionsasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT eadessandraj stakeholderperspectivesontheimplementationandimpactofindigenoushealthinterventionsasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT howardkirsten stakeholderperspectivesontheimplementationandimpactofindigenoushealthinterventionsasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies